Cargando…
Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24476504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10 |
_version_ | 1782301588201668608 |
---|---|
author | Requena, Antonio Cruz, María Ruiz, Francisco J García-Velasco, Juan A |
author_facet | Requena, Antonio Cruz, María Ruiz, Francisco J García-Velasco, Juan A |
author_sort | Requena, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid from controlled ovarian stimulation with the recombinant gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone plus luteinizing hormone (rFSH + rLH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG). METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study with 50 oocyte donors that received either a combination of recombinant gonadotropins (rFSH + rLH) or a mixture of urinary gonadotropins (HP-hMG) plus purified urinary FSH (uFSH). Results were analyzed using Student’s t-test to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test to compare proportions. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Although more oocytes were retrieved after treatment with recombinant than urinary gonadotropins (16.5 vs. 11.8; P = 0.049), a higher proportion of metaphase II ova (71.2% vs. 80.6%; P = 0.003) were obtained using urinary gonadotropins. On day 6 and on the day of triggering, serum steroid hormone levels were slightly but not significantly elevated in the recombinant group compared with the urinary group. In follicular fluid, no statistical differences were observed for intra-follicular levels of steroid hormones between the two protocols; ongoing pregnancy rates were similar (46.1% vs. 46.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that endocrinological and follicular profiles do not differ between rFSH + rLH and HP-hMG stimulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3907361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39073612014-01-31 Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin Requena, Antonio Cruz, María Ruiz, Francisco J García-Velasco, Juan A Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid from controlled ovarian stimulation with the recombinant gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone plus luteinizing hormone (rFSH + rLH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG). METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study with 50 oocyte donors that received either a combination of recombinant gonadotropins (rFSH + rLH) or a mixture of urinary gonadotropins (HP-hMG) plus purified urinary FSH (uFSH). Results were analyzed using Student’s t-test to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test to compare proportions. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Although more oocytes were retrieved after treatment with recombinant than urinary gonadotropins (16.5 vs. 11.8; P = 0.049), a higher proportion of metaphase II ova (71.2% vs. 80.6%; P = 0.003) were obtained using urinary gonadotropins. On day 6 and on the day of triggering, serum steroid hormone levels were slightly but not significantly elevated in the recombinant group compared with the urinary group. In follicular fluid, no statistical differences were observed for intra-follicular levels of steroid hormones between the two protocols; ongoing pregnancy rates were similar (46.1% vs. 46.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that endocrinological and follicular profiles do not differ between rFSH + rLH and HP-hMG stimulation. BioMed Central 2014-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3907361/ /pubmed/24476504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Requena et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Requena, Antonio Cruz, María Ruiz, Francisco J García-Velasco, Juan A Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title | Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title_full | Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title_fullStr | Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title_full_unstemmed | Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title_short | Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
title_sort | endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24476504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT requenaantonio endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin AT cruzmaria endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin AT ruizfranciscoj endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin AT garciavelascojuana endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin |