Cargando…

Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin

BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Requena, Antonio, Cruz, María, Ruiz, Francisco J, García-Velasco, Juan A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24476504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10
_version_ 1782301588201668608
author Requena, Antonio
Cruz, María
Ruiz, Francisco J
García-Velasco, Juan A
author_facet Requena, Antonio
Cruz, María
Ruiz, Francisco J
García-Velasco, Juan A
author_sort Requena, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid from controlled ovarian stimulation with the recombinant gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone plus luteinizing hormone (rFSH + rLH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG). METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study with 50 oocyte donors that received either a combination of recombinant gonadotropins (rFSH + rLH) or a mixture of urinary gonadotropins (HP-hMG) plus purified urinary FSH (uFSH). Results were analyzed using Student’s t-test to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test to compare proportions. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Although more oocytes were retrieved after treatment with recombinant than urinary gonadotropins (16.5 vs. 11.8; P = 0.049), a higher proportion of metaphase II ova (71.2% vs. 80.6%; P = 0.003) were obtained using urinary gonadotropins. On day 6 and on the day of triggering, serum steroid hormone levels were slightly but not significantly elevated in the recombinant group compared with the urinary group. In follicular fluid, no statistical differences were observed for intra-follicular levels of steroid hormones between the two protocols; ongoing pregnancy rates were similar (46.1% vs. 46.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that endocrinological and follicular profiles do not differ between rFSH + rLH and HP-hMG stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39073612014-01-31 Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin Requena, Antonio Cruz, María Ruiz, Francisco J García-Velasco, Juan A Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Luteinizing hormone (LH) activity in human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) preparations is derived from human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) rather than LH. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether there are similarities in the endocrine and follicular profiles of serum and follicular fluid from controlled ovarian stimulation with the recombinant gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone plus luteinizing hormone (rFSH + rLH) or highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG). METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study with 50 oocyte donors that received either a combination of recombinant gonadotropins (rFSH + rLH) or a mixture of urinary gonadotropins (HP-hMG) plus purified urinary FSH (uFSH). Results were analyzed using Student’s t-test to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test to compare proportions. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Although more oocytes were retrieved after treatment with recombinant than urinary gonadotropins (16.5 vs. 11.8; P = 0.049), a higher proportion of metaphase II ova (71.2% vs. 80.6%; P = 0.003) were obtained using urinary gonadotropins. On day 6 and on the day of triggering, serum steroid hormone levels were slightly but not significantly elevated in the recombinant group compared with the urinary group. In follicular fluid, no statistical differences were observed for intra-follicular levels of steroid hormones between the two protocols; ongoing pregnancy rates were similar (46.1% vs. 46.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that endocrinological and follicular profiles do not differ between rFSH + rLH and HP-hMG stimulation. BioMed Central 2014-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3907361/ /pubmed/24476504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Requena et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Requena, Antonio
Cruz, María
Ruiz, Francisco J
García-Velasco, Juan A
Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title_full Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title_fullStr Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title_full_unstemmed Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title_short Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
title_sort endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24476504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-10
work_keys_str_mv AT requenaantonio endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin
AT cruzmaria endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin
AT ruizfranciscoj endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin
AT garciavelascojuana endocrineprofilefollowingstimulationwithrecombinantfolliclestimulatinghormoneandluteinizinghormoneversushighlypurifiedhumanmenopausalgonadotropin