Cargando…

Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers

We established a genomic model of quantitative trait with genomic additive and dominance relationships that parallels the traditional quantitative genetics model, which partitions a genotypic value as breeding value plus dominance deviation and calculates additive and dominance relationships using p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Da, Yang, Wang, Chunkao, Wang, Shengwen, Hu, Guo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087666
_version_ 1782301625654706176
author Da, Yang
Wang, Chunkao
Wang, Shengwen
Hu, Guo
author_facet Da, Yang
Wang, Chunkao
Wang, Shengwen
Hu, Guo
author_sort Da, Yang
collection PubMed
description We established a genomic model of quantitative trait with genomic additive and dominance relationships that parallels the traditional quantitative genetics model, which partitions a genotypic value as breeding value plus dominance deviation and calculates additive and dominance relationships using pedigree information. Based on this genomic model, two sets of computationally complementary but mathematically identical mixed model methods were developed for genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and genomic restricted maximum likelihood estimation (GREML) of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. These two sets are referred to as the CE and QM sets, where the CE set was designed for large numbers of markers and the QM set was designed for large numbers of individuals. GBLUP and associated accuracy formulations for individuals in training and validation data sets were derived for breeding values, dominance deviations and genotypic values. Simulation study showed that GREML and GBLUP generally were able to capture small additive and dominance effects that each accounted for 0.00005–0.0003 of the phenotypic variance and GREML was able to differentiate true additive and dominance heritability levels. GBLUP of the total genetic value as the summation of additive and dominance effects had higher prediction accuracy than either additive or dominance GBLUP, causal variants had the highest accuracy of GREML and GBLUP, and predicted accuracies were in agreement with observed accuracies. Genomic additive and dominance relationship matrices using SNP markers were consistent with theoretical expectations. The GREML and GBLUP methods can be an effective tool for assessing the type and magnitude of genetic effects affecting a phenotype and for predicting the total genetic value at the whole genome level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39075682014-02-04 Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers Da, Yang Wang, Chunkao Wang, Shengwen Hu, Guo PLoS One Research Article We established a genomic model of quantitative trait with genomic additive and dominance relationships that parallels the traditional quantitative genetics model, which partitions a genotypic value as breeding value plus dominance deviation and calculates additive and dominance relationships using pedigree information. Based on this genomic model, two sets of computationally complementary but mathematically identical mixed model methods were developed for genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and genomic restricted maximum likelihood estimation (GREML) of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers. These two sets are referred to as the CE and QM sets, where the CE set was designed for large numbers of markers and the QM set was designed for large numbers of individuals. GBLUP and associated accuracy formulations for individuals in training and validation data sets were derived for breeding values, dominance deviations and genotypic values. Simulation study showed that GREML and GBLUP generally were able to capture small additive and dominance effects that each accounted for 0.00005–0.0003 of the phenotypic variance and GREML was able to differentiate true additive and dominance heritability levels. GBLUP of the total genetic value as the summation of additive and dominance effects had higher prediction accuracy than either additive or dominance GBLUP, causal variants had the highest accuracy of GREML and GBLUP, and predicted accuracies were in agreement with observed accuracies. Genomic additive and dominance relationship matrices using SNP markers were consistent with theoretical expectations. The GREML and GBLUP methods can be an effective tool for assessing the type and magnitude of genetic effects affecting a phenotype and for predicting the total genetic value at the whole genome level. Public Library of Science 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3907568/ /pubmed/24498162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087666 Text en © 2014 Da et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Da, Yang
Wang, Chunkao
Wang, Shengwen
Hu, Guo
Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title_full Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title_fullStr Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title_full_unstemmed Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title_short Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
title_sort mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using snp markers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087666
work_keys_str_mv AT dayang mixedmodelmethodsforgenomicpredictionandvariancecomponentestimationofadditiveanddominanceeffectsusingsnpmarkers
AT wangchunkao mixedmodelmethodsforgenomicpredictionandvariancecomponentestimationofadditiveanddominanceeffectsusingsnpmarkers
AT wangshengwen mixedmodelmethodsforgenomicpredictionandvariancecomponentestimationofadditiveanddominanceeffectsusingsnpmarkers
AT huguo mixedmodelmethodsforgenomicpredictionandvariancecomponentestimationofadditiveanddominanceeffectsusingsnpmarkers