Cargando…
Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence, and leg strength in veteran cyclists. Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists [age: 47 ± 6 years,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034 |
_version_ | 1782301639742324736 |
---|---|
author | Kristoffersen, Morten Gundersen, Hilde Leirdal, Stig Iversen, Vegard V. |
author_facet | Kristoffersen, Morten Gundersen, Hilde Leirdal, Stig Iversen, Vegard V. |
author_sort | Kristoffersen, Morten |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence, and leg strength in veteran cyclists. Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists [age: 47 ± 6 years, maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)): 57.9 ± 3.7 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)] were randomized into two groups, a low cadence training group and a freely chose cadence training group. Respiratory variables, power output, cadence and leg strength were tested before and after a 12 weeks training intervention period. The low cadence training group performed 12 weeks of moderate [73–82% of maximal heart rate (HR(max))] interval training (5 × 6 min) with a cadence of 40 revolutions per min (rpm) two times a week, in addition to their usual training. The freely chosen cadence group added 90 min of training at freely chosen cadence at moderate intensity. Results: No significant effects of the low cadence training on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, power output, cadence, gross efficiency, or leg strength was found. The freely chosen cadence group significantly improved both VO(2max) (58.9 ± 2.4 vs. 62.2 ± 3.2 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)), VO(2) consumption at lactate threshold (49.4 ± 3.8 vs. 51.8 ± 3.5 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)) and during the 30 min performance test (52.8 ± 3.0 vs. 54.7 ± 3.5 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)), and power output at lactate threshold (284 ± 47 vs. 294 ± 48 W) and during the 30 min performance test (284 ± 42 vs. 297 ± 50 W). Moreover, a significant difference was seen when comparing the change in freely chosen cadence from pre- to post between the groups during the 30 min performance test (2.4 ± 5.0 vs. −2.7 ± 6.2). Conclusion: Twelve weeks of low cadence (40 rpm) interval training at moderate intensity (73–82% of HR(max)) twice a week does not improve aerobic capacity, cycling performance or leg strength in highly trained veteran cyclists. However, adding training at same intensity (% of HR(max)) and duration (90 min weekly) at freely chosen cadence seems beneficial for performance and physiological adaptations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3907705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39077052014-02-18 Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists Kristoffersen, Morten Gundersen, Hilde Leirdal, Stig Iversen, Vegard V. Front Physiol Physiology Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of low cadence training at moderate intensity on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, gross efficiency, freely chosen cadence, and leg strength in veteran cyclists. Method: Twenty-two well trained veteran cyclists [age: 47 ± 6 years, maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)): 57.9 ± 3.7 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)] were randomized into two groups, a low cadence training group and a freely chose cadence training group. Respiratory variables, power output, cadence and leg strength were tested before and after a 12 weeks training intervention period. The low cadence training group performed 12 weeks of moderate [73–82% of maximal heart rate (HR(max))] interval training (5 × 6 min) with a cadence of 40 revolutions per min (rpm) two times a week, in addition to their usual training. The freely chosen cadence group added 90 min of training at freely chosen cadence at moderate intensity. Results: No significant effects of the low cadence training on aerobic capacity, cycling performance, power output, cadence, gross efficiency, or leg strength was found. The freely chosen cadence group significantly improved both VO(2max) (58.9 ± 2.4 vs. 62.2 ± 3.2 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)), VO(2) consumption at lactate threshold (49.4 ± 3.8 vs. 51.8 ± 3.5 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)) and during the 30 min performance test (52.8 ± 3.0 vs. 54.7 ± 3.5 ml · kg(−1) · min(−1)), and power output at lactate threshold (284 ± 47 vs. 294 ± 48 W) and during the 30 min performance test (284 ± 42 vs. 297 ± 50 W). Moreover, a significant difference was seen when comparing the change in freely chosen cadence from pre- to post between the groups during the 30 min performance test (2.4 ± 5.0 vs. −2.7 ± 6.2). Conclusion: Twelve weeks of low cadence (40 rpm) interval training at moderate intensity (73–82% of HR(max)) twice a week does not improve aerobic capacity, cycling performance or leg strength in highly trained veteran cyclists. However, adding training at same intensity (% of HR(max)) and duration (90 min weekly) at freely chosen cadence seems beneficial for performance and physiological adaptations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3907705/ /pubmed/24550843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kristoffersen, Gundersen, Leirdal and Iversen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Kristoffersen, Morten Gundersen, Hilde Leirdal, Stig Iversen, Vegard V. Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title | Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title_full | Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title_fullStr | Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title_full_unstemmed | Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title_short | Low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
title_sort | low cadence interval training at moderate intensity does not improve cycling performance in highly trained veteran cyclists |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kristoffersenmorten lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists AT gundersenhilde lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists AT leirdalstig lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists AT iversenvegardv lowcadenceintervaltrainingatmoderateintensitydoesnotimprovecyclingperformanceinhighlytrainedveterancyclists |