Cargando…

A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are ischemic wounds in the skin and underlying tissues caused by long-standing pressure force over an external bone or cartilaginous surface. PrUs are an important challenge for the overall health system because can prolong patient hospitalization and reduce qualit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillén-Solà, Mireia, Soler Mieras, Aina, Tomàs-Vidal, Antònia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-196
_version_ 1782301650842550272
author Guillén-Solà, Mireia
Soler Mieras, Aina
Tomàs-Vidal, Antònia M
author_facet Guillén-Solà, Mireia
Soler Mieras, Aina
Tomàs-Vidal, Antònia M
author_sort Guillén-Solà, Mireia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are ischemic wounds in the skin and underlying tissues caused by long-standing pressure force over an external bone or cartilaginous surface. PrUs are an important challenge for the overall health system because can prolong patient hospitalization and reduce quality of life. Moreover, 95% of PrUs are avoidable, suggesting they are caused by poor quality care assistance. PrUs are also costly, increasing national costs. For example, they represent about 5% of overall annual health expenses in Spain. Stages I and II PrUs have a combined prevalence of 65%. According main clinical guidelines, stage II PrUs (PrU-IIs) are usually treated by applying special dressings (polyurethane or hydrocolloid). However, little scientific evidence regarding their efficacy has been identified in scientific literature. Our aim is to assess the comparative efficacy of adhesive polyurethane foam and hydrocolloid dressings in the treatment of PrU-IIs in terms of healed ulcer after 8 weeks of follow-up. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the development and evaluation protocol of a randomized clinical trial of two parallel treatment arms. A total of 820 patients with at least 1 PrU-II will be recruited from primary health care and home care centers. All patients will receive standardized healing procedures and preventive measures (e.g. positional changes and pressure-relieving support surfaces), following standardized procedures. The main outcome will be the percentage of wounds healed after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, as evaluated by cost per healed ulcer and cost per treated patient and safety evaluated by adverse events. DISCUSSION: This trial will address the hypothesis that hydrocolloid dressings will heal at least 10% more stage II PrUs and be more cost-effective than polyurethane foam dressings after 8 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered with controlled-trials number ISCRCTN57842461 and EudraCT 2012-003945-14.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39077792014-02-01 A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes Guillén-Solà, Mireia Soler Mieras, Aina Tomàs-Vidal, Antònia M BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PrUs) are ischemic wounds in the skin and underlying tissues caused by long-standing pressure force over an external bone or cartilaginous surface. PrUs are an important challenge for the overall health system because can prolong patient hospitalization and reduce quality of life. Moreover, 95% of PrUs are avoidable, suggesting they are caused by poor quality care assistance. PrUs are also costly, increasing national costs. For example, they represent about 5% of overall annual health expenses in Spain. Stages I and II PrUs have a combined prevalence of 65%. According main clinical guidelines, stage II PrUs (PrU-IIs) are usually treated by applying special dressings (polyurethane or hydrocolloid). However, little scientific evidence regarding their efficacy has been identified in scientific literature. Our aim is to assess the comparative efficacy of adhesive polyurethane foam and hydrocolloid dressings in the treatment of PrU-IIs in terms of healed ulcer after 8 weeks of follow-up. METHODS/DESIGN: This paper describes the development and evaluation protocol of a randomized clinical trial of two parallel treatment arms. A total of 820 patients with at least 1 PrU-II will be recruited from primary health care and home care centers. All patients will receive standardized healing procedures and preventive measures (e.g. positional changes and pressure-relieving support surfaces), following standardized procedures. The main outcome will be the percentage of wounds healed after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, as evaluated by cost per healed ulcer and cost per treated patient and safety evaluated by adverse events. DISCUSSION: This trial will address the hypothesis that hydrocolloid dressings will heal at least 10% more stage II PrUs and be more cost-effective than polyurethane foam dressings after 8 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered with controlled-trials number ISCRCTN57842461 and EudraCT 2012-003945-14. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3907779/ /pubmed/24359122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-196 Text en Copyright © 2013 Guillén-Solà et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Guillén-Solà, Mireia
Soler Mieras, Aina
Tomàs-Vidal, Antònia M
A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title_full A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title_fullStr A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title_full_unstemmed A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title_short A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
title_sort multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade ii pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-14-196
work_keys_str_mv AT guillensolamireia amulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes
AT solermierasaina amulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes
AT tomasvidalantoniam amulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes
AT guillensolamireia multicenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes
AT solermierasaina multicenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes
AT tomasvidalantoniam multicenterrandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingadhesivepolyurethanefoamdressingandadhesivehydrocolloiddressinginpatientswithgradeiipressureulcersinprimarycareandnursinghomes