Cargando…

Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion

We simultaneously perturbed visual, vestibular and proprioceptive modalities to understand how sensory feedback is re-weighted so that overall feedback remains suited to stabilizing upright stance. Ten healthy young subjects received an 80 Hz vibratory stimulus to their bilateral Achilles tendons (s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Sungjae, Agada, Peter, Kiemel, Tim, Jeka, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088132
_version_ 1782301832243052544
author Hwang, Sungjae
Agada, Peter
Kiemel, Tim
Jeka, John J.
author_facet Hwang, Sungjae
Agada, Peter
Kiemel, Tim
Jeka, John J.
author_sort Hwang, Sungjae
collection PubMed
description We simultaneously perturbed visual, vestibular and proprioceptive modalities to understand how sensory feedback is re-weighted so that overall feedback remains suited to stabilizing upright stance. Ten healthy young subjects received an 80 Hz vibratory stimulus to their bilateral Achilles tendons (stimulus turns on-off at 0.28 Hz), a ±1 mA binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulus at 0.36 Hz, and a visual stimulus at 0.2 Hz during standing. The visual stimulus was presented at different amplitudes (0.2, 0.8 deg rotation about ankle axis) to measure: the change in gain (weighting) to vision, an intramodal effect; and a change in gain to vibration and galvanic vestibular stimulation, both intermodal effects. The results showed a clear intramodal visual effect, indicating a de-emphasis on vision when the amplitude of visual stimulus increased. At the same time, an intermodal visual-proprioceptive reweighting effect was observed with the addition of vibration, which is thought to change proprioceptive inputs at the ankles, forcing the nervous system to rely more on vision and vestibular modalities. Similar intermodal effects for visual-vestibular reweighting were observed, suggesting that vestibular information is not a “fixed” reference, but is dynamically adjusted in the sensor fusion process. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that the interplay between the three primary modalities for postural control has been clearly delineated, illustrating a central process that fuses these modalities for accurate estimates of self-motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3909337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39093372014-02-04 Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion Hwang, Sungjae Agada, Peter Kiemel, Tim Jeka, John J. PLoS One Research Article We simultaneously perturbed visual, vestibular and proprioceptive modalities to understand how sensory feedback is re-weighted so that overall feedback remains suited to stabilizing upright stance. Ten healthy young subjects received an 80 Hz vibratory stimulus to their bilateral Achilles tendons (stimulus turns on-off at 0.28 Hz), a ±1 mA binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulus at 0.36 Hz, and a visual stimulus at 0.2 Hz during standing. The visual stimulus was presented at different amplitudes (0.2, 0.8 deg rotation about ankle axis) to measure: the change in gain (weighting) to vision, an intramodal effect; and a change in gain to vibration and galvanic vestibular stimulation, both intermodal effects. The results showed a clear intramodal visual effect, indicating a de-emphasis on vision when the amplitude of visual stimulus increased. At the same time, an intermodal visual-proprioceptive reweighting effect was observed with the addition of vibration, which is thought to change proprioceptive inputs at the ankles, forcing the nervous system to rely more on vision and vestibular modalities. Similar intermodal effects for visual-vestibular reweighting were observed, suggesting that vestibular information is not a “fixed” reference, but is dynamically adjusted in the sensor fusion process. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that the interplay between the three primary modalities for postural control has been clearly delineated, illustrating a central process that fuses these modalities for accurate estimates of self-motion. Public Library of Science 2014-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3909337/ /pubmed/24498252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088132 Text en © 2014 Hwang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hwang, Sungjae
Agada, Peter
Kiemel, Tim
Jeka, John J.
Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title_full Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title_fullStr Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title_short Dynamic Reweighting of Three Modalities for Sensor Fusion
title_sort dynamic reweighting of three modalities for sensor fusion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088132
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangsungjae dynamicreweightingofthreemodalitiesforsensorfusion
AT agadapeter dynamicreweightingofthreemodalitiesforsensorfusion
AT kiemeltim dynamicreweightingofthreemodalitiesforsensorfusion
AT jekajohnj dynamicreweightingofthreemodalitiesforsensorfusion