Cargando…
Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316701 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306 |
_version_ | 1782301854449795072 |
---|---|
author | Sierra-Sánchez, José L. Martínez-González, Amparo García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando Mañes-Ferrer, José F. Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro |
author_facet | Sierra-Sánchez, José L. Martínez-González, Amparo García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando Mañes-Ferrer, José F. Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro |
author_sort | Sierra-Sánchez, José L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Material and Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed. Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Key words:Narrow implant, survival rate, peri-implant bone loss, related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3909436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39094362014-02-10 Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review Sierra-Sánchez, José L. Martínez-González, Amparo García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando Mañes-Ferrer, José F. Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Material and Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed. Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Key words:Narrow implant, survival rate, peri-implant bone loss, related complications. Medicina Oral S.L. 2014-01 2013-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3909436/ /pubmed/24316701 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Sierra-Sánchez, José L. Martínez-González, Amparo García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando Mañes-Ferrer, José F. Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review |
title | Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable
treatment option? A literature review |
title_full | Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable
treatment option? A literature review |
title_fullStr | Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable
treatment option? A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable
treatment option? A literature review |
title_short | Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable
treatment option? A literature review |
title_sort | narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable
treatment option? a literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316701 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sierrasanchezjosel narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview AT martinezgonzalezamparo narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview AT garciasalabonmatifernando narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview AT manesferrerjosef narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview AT brotonsoliveralejandro narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview |