Cargando…

Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review

Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sierra-Sánchez, José L., Martínez-González, Amparo, García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando, Mañes-Ferrer, José F., Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316701
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306
_version_ 1782301854449795072
author Sierra-Sánchez, José L.
Martínez-González, Amparo
García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando
Mañes-Ferrer, José F.
Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro
author_facet Sierra-Sánchez, José L.
Martínez-González, Amparo
García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando
Mañes-Ferrer, José F.
Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro
author_sort Sierra-Sánchez, José L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Material and Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed. Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Key words:Narrow implant, survival rate, peri-implant bone loss, related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3909436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39094362014-02-10 Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review Sierra-Sánchez, José L. Martínez-González, Amparo García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando Mañes-Ferrer, José F. Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Review Objective: To evaluate the predictability of narrow-diameter implants as a treatment option in routine clinical practice. A literature review was performed of studies reporting clinical results obtained with these implants. Survival rates, peri-implant bone loss and related complications were evaluated. The working hypothesis was that narrow-diameter implants offer clinical results similar to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Material and Methods: A Medline-PubMed search covering the period between 2002 and 2012 was carried out. Studies published in English and with a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered for inclusion. A manual search was also conducted in different journals with an important impact factor. Results: Twenty-one studies meeting the screening criteria were included in the literature review. A total of 2980 narrow-diameter implants placed in 1607 patients were analyzed. Conclusions: The results obtained from the literature indicate that narrow-diameter implants are a predictable treatment option, since they afford clinical results comparable to those obtained with implants of greater diameter. Key words:Narrow implant, survival rate, peri-implant bone loss, related complications. Medicina Oral S.L. 2014-01 2013-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3909436/ /pubmed/24316701 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Sierra-Sánchez, José L.
Martínez-González, Amparo
García-Sala Bonmatí, Fernando
Mañes-Ferrer, José F.
Brotons-Oliver, Alejandro
Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title_full Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title_fullStr Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title_full_unstemmed Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title_short Narrow-diameter implants: Are they a predictable treatment option? A literature review
title_sort narrow-diameter implants: are they a predictable treatment option? a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24316701
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19306
work_keys_str_mv AT sierrasanchezjosel narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview
AT martinezgonzalezamparo narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview
AT garciasalabonmatifernando narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview
AT manesferrerjosef narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview
AT brotonsoliveralejandro narrowdiameterimplantsaretheyapredictabletreatmentoptionaliteraturereview