Cargando…

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with the PELF - protocol (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Leukovorin, 5-Fluoruracil) on mortality, recurrence and prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, UICC stages Ib-III. METHODS: 64 patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruf, Catharina, Thomusch, Oliver, Goos, Matthias, Makowiec, Frank, Illerhaus, Gerald, Ruf, Guenther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24461063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-5
_version_ 1782301915118305280
author Ruf, Catharina
Thomusch, Oliver
Goos, Matthias
Makowiec, Frank
Illerhaus, Gerald
Ruf, Guenther
author_facet Ruf, Catharina
Thomusch, Oliver
Goos, Matthias
Makowiec, Frank
Illerhaus, Gerald
Ruf, Guenther
author_sort Ruf, Catharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with the PELF - protocol (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Leukovorin, 5-Fluoruracil) on mortality, recurrence and prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, UICC stages Ib-III. METHODS: 64 patients were included. 26 patients received neoadjuvant CTx followed by surgical resection, 38 received surgical resection only. Tumor staging was performed by endoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and laparoscopy. Patients staged Ib – III received two cycles of CTx according to the PELF-protocol. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed at all. RESULTS: Complete (CR) or partial response (PR) was seen in 20 patients (77%), 19% showing CR and 58% PR. No benefit was observed in 6 patients (23%). Two of these 6 patients displayed tumor progression during CTx. Major toxicity was defined as grade 3 to 4 neutropenia or gastrointestinal side effects. One patient died under CTx because of neutropenia and was excluded from the overall patient collective. The curative resection rate was 77% after CTx and 74% after surgery only. The perioperative morbidity rate after CTx was 39% versus 66% after resection only. Recurrence rate after CTx was 38% and 61% after surgery alone; we detected an effective reduction of locoregional recurrence (12% vs. 26%). The overall survival was 38% after CTx and 42% after resection only. The 5-year survival rates were 45% in responders, 20% in non - responders and 42% in only resected patients. A subgroup analysis indicates that responders with stage III tumors may benefit with respect to their 5-year survival in comparable patients without neoadjuvant CTx. As to be expected, non-responders with stage III tumors did not benefit with respect to their survival. The 5-year-survival was approximated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using a log-rank test. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, neoadjuvant CTx with the PELF- protocol significantly reduces the recurrence rate, especially locoregionally, compared to surgery alone. In our study, there was no overall survival benefit after a 5-year follow-up period. Alone a subgroup of patients with stage III tumors appear to benefit significantly in the long term from neoadjuvant CTx.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3909936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39099362014-02-04 Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma Ruf, Catharina Thomusch, Oliver Goos, Matthias Makowiec, Frank Illerhaus, Gerald Ruf, Guenther BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: In a retrospective study we analyzed the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) with the PELF - protocol (Cisplatin, Epirubicin, Leukovorin, 5-Fluoruracil) on mortality, recurrence and prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, UICC stages Ib-III. METHODS: 64 patients were included. 26 patients received neoadjuvant CTx followed by surgical resection, 38 received surgical resection only. Tumor staging was performed by endoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and laparoscopy. Patients staged Ib – III received two cycles of CTx according to the PELF-protocol. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not performed at all. RESULTS: Complete (CR) or partial response (PR) was seen in 20 patients (77%), 19% showing CR and 58% PR. No benefit was observed in 6 patients (23%). Two of these 6 patients displayed tumor progression during CTx. Major toxicity was defined as grade 3 to 4 neutropenia or gastrointestinal side effects. One patient died under CTx because of neutropenia and was excluded from the overall patient collective. The curative resection rate was 77% after CTx and 74% after surgery only. The perioperative morbidity rate after CTx was 39% versus 66% after resection only. Recurrence rate after CTx was 38% and 61% after surgery alone; we detected an effective reduction of locoregional recurrence (12% vs. 26%). The overall survival was 38% after CTx and 42% after resection only. The 5-year survival rates were 45% in responders, 20% in non - responders and 42% in only resected patients. A subgroup analysis indicates that responders with stage III tumors may benefit with respect to their 5-year survival in comparable patients without neoadjuvant CTx. As to be expected, non-responders with stage III tumors did not benefit with respect to their survival. The 5-year-survival was approximated using a Kaplan-Meier curve and compared using a log-rank test. CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, neoadjuvant CTx with the PELF- protocol significantly reduces the recurrence rate, especially locoregionally, compared to surgery alone. In our study, there was no overall survival benefit after a 5-year follow-up period. Alone a subgroup of patients with stage III tumors appear to benefit significantly in the long term from neoadjuvant CTx. BioMed Central 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3909936/ /pubmed/24461063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-5 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ruf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ruf, Catharina
Thomusch, Oliver
Goos, Matthias
Makowiec, Frank
Illerhaus, Gerald
Ruf, Guenther
Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title_full Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title_fullStr Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title_short Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PELF-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
title_sort impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pelf-protocoll versus surgery alone in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24461063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rufcatharina impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma
AT thomuscholiver impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma
AT goosmatthias impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma
AT makowiecfrank impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma
AT illerhausgerald impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma
AT rufguenther impactofneoadjuvantchemotherapywithpelfprotocollversussurgeryaloneinthetreatmentofadvancedgastriccarcinoma