Cargando…
Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497729 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019 |
_version_ | 1782301968874602496 |
---|---|
author | Kaissi, Ouafae Nimpaye, Eric Singh, Tiratha Raj Vannier, Brigitte Ibrahimi, Azeddine Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani Moussa, Ahmed |
author_facet | Kaissi, Ouafae Nimpaye, Eric Singh, Tiratha Raj Vannier, Brigitte Ibrahimi, Azeddine Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani Moussa, Ahmed |
author_sort | Kaissi, Ouafae |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when we used different developments tools. Here, we considered three commonly used differentially expressed genes selection approaches, namely: Fold Change, T-test and SAM, using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox and R/BioConductor. We used two datasets, issued from the affymetrix technology, to present results of used methods and software's in gene selection process. The results, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, indicate that the behavior of SAM is better compared to Fold Change and T-test using R/BioConductor. While, no practical differences were observed between the three gene selection methods when using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox. In face of our result, the ROC curve shows that: on the one hand R/BioConductor using SAM is favored for microarray selection compared to the other methods. And, on the other hand, results of the three studied gene selection methods using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox are still comparable for the two datasets used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3910358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39103582014-02-04 Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis Kaissi, Ouafae Nimpaye, Eric Singh, Tiratha Raj Vannier, Brigitte Ibrahimi, Azeddine Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani Moussa, Ahmed Bioinformation Hypothesis In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when we used different developments tools. Here, we considered three commonly used differentially expressed genes selection approaches, namely: Fold Change, T-test and SAM, using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox and R/BioConductor. We used two datasets, issued from the affymetrix technology, to present results of used methods and software's in gene selection process. The results, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, indicate that the behavior of SAM is better compared to Fold Change and T-test using R/BioConductor. While, no practical differences were observed between the three gene selection methods when using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox. In face of our result, the ROC curve shows that: on the one hand R/BioConductor using SAM is favored for microarray selection compared to the other methods. And, on the other hand, results of the three studied gene selection methods using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox are still comparable for the two datasets used. Biomedical Informatics 2013-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3910358/ /pubmed/24497729 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019 Text en © 2013 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Kaissi, Ouafae Nimpaye, Eric Singh, Tiratha Raj Vannier, Brigitte Ibrahimi, Azeddine Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani Moussa, Ahmed Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title | Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title_full | Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title_fullStr | Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title_short | Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis |
title_sort | genes selection comparative study in microarray data analysis |
topic | Hypothesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497729 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaissiouafae genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT nimpayeeric genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT singhtiratharaj genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT vannierbrigitte genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT ibrahimiazeddine genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT ghachamabdellatifamrani genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis AT moussaahmed genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis |