Cargando…

Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis

In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaissi, Ouafae, Nimpaye, Eric, Singh, Tiratha Raj, Vannier, Brigitte, Ibrahimi, Azeddine, Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani, Moussa, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497729
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019
_version_ 1782301968874602496
author Kaissi, Ouafae
Nimpaye, Eric
Singh, Tiratha Raj
Vannier, Brigitte
Ibrahimi, Azeddine
Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani
Moussa, Ahmed
author_facet Kaissi, Ouafae
Nimpaye, Eric
Singh, Tiratha Raj
Vannier, Brigitte
Ibrahimi, Azeddine
Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani
Moussa, Ahmed
author_sort Kaissi, Ouafae
collection PubMed
description In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when we used different developments tools. Here, we considered three commonly used differentially expressed genes selection approaches, namely: Fold Change, T-test and SAM, using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox and R/BioConductor. We used two datasets, issued from the affymetrix technology, to present results of used methods and software's in gene selection process. The results, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, indicate that the behavior of SAM is better compared to Fold Change and T-test using R/BioConductor. While, no practical differences were observed between the three gene selection methods when using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox. In face of our result, the ROC curve shows that: on the one hand R/BioConductor using SAM is favored for microarray selection compared to the other methods. And, on the other hand, results of the three studied gene selection methods using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox are still comparable for the two datasets used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3910358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39103582014-02-04 Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis Kaissi, Ouafae Nimpaye, Eric Singh, Tiratha Raj Vannier, Brigitte Ibrahimi, Azeddine Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani Moussa, Ahmed Bioinformation Hypothesis In response to the rapid development of DNA Microarray Technologies, many differentially expressed genes selection algorithms have been developed, and different comparison studies of these algorithms have been done. However, it is not clear how these methods compare with each other, especially when we used different developments tools. Here, we considered three commonly used differentially expressed genes selection approaches, namely: Fold Change, T-test and SAM, using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox and R/BioConductor. We used two datasets, issued from the affymetrix technology, to present results of used methods and software's in gene selection process. The results, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, indicate that the behavior of SAM is better compared to Fold Change and T-test using R/BioConductor. While, no practical differences were observed between the three gene selection methods when using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox. In face of our result, the ROC curve shows that: on the one hand R/BioConductor using SAM is favored for microarray selection compared to the other methods. And, on the other hand, results of the three studied gene selection methods using Bioinformatics Matlab Toolbox are still comparable for the two datasets used. Biomedical Informatics 2013-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3910358/ /pubmed/24497729 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019 Text en © 2013 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Kaissi, Ouafae
Nimpaye, Eric
Singh, Tiratha Raj
Vannier, Brigitte
Ibrahimi, Azeddine
Ghacham, Abdellatif Amrani
Moussa, Ahmed
Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title_full Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title_fullStr Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title_short Genes Selection Comparative Study in Microarray Data Analysis
title_sort genes selection comparative study in microarray data analysis
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497729
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630091019
work_keys_str_mv AT kaissiouafae genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT nimpayeeric genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT singhtiratharaj genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT vannierbrigitte genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT ibrahimiazeddine genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT ghachamabdellatifamrani genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis
AT moussaahmed genesselectioncomparativestudyinmicroarraydataanalysis