Cargando…

Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)

We introduce a new task for exploring the relationship between action and attention. In this interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT) task, implemented as an iPad app, participants were presented with a display of multiple, visually identical disks which moved independently. The task was to preve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thornton, Ian M., Bülthoff, Heinrich H., Horowitz, Todd S., Rynning, Aksel, Lee, Seong-Whan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3911935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086974
_version_ 1782302017000046592
author Thornton, Ian M.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Horowitz, Todd S.
Rynning, Aksel
Lee, Seong-Whan
author_facet Thornton, Ian M.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Horowitz, Todd S.
Rynning, Aksel
Lee, Seong-Whan
author_sort Thornton, Ian M.
collection PubMed
description We introduce a new task for exploring the relationship between action and attention. In this interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT) task, implemented as an iPad app, participants were presented with a display of multiple, visually identical disks which moved independently. The task was to prevent any collisions during a fixed duration. Participants could perturb object trajectories via the touchscreen. In Experiment 1, we used a staircase procedure to measure the ability to control moving objects. Object speed was set to 1°/s. On average participants could control 8.4 items without collision. Individual control strategies were quite variable, but did not predict overall performance. In Experiment 2, we compared iMOT with standard MOT performance using identical displays. Object speed was set to 2°/s. Participants could reliably control more objects (M = 6.6) than they could track (M = 4.0), but performance in the two tasks was positively correlated. In Experiment 3, we used a dual-task design. Compared to single-task baseline, iMOT performance decreased and MOT performance increased when the two tasks had to be completed together. Overall, these findings suggest: 1) There is a clear limit to the number of items that can be simultaneously controlled, for a given speed and display density; 2) participants can control more items than they can track; 3) task-relevant action appears not to disrupt MOT performance in the current experimental context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3911935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39119352014-02-04 Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT) Thornton, Ian M. Bülthoff, Heinrich H. Horowitz, Todd S. Rynning, Aksel Lee, Seong-Whan PLoS One Research Article We introduce a new task for exploring the relationship between action and attention. In this interactive multiple object tracking (iMOT) task, implemented as an iPad app, participants were presented with a display of multiple, visually identical disks which moved independently. The task was to prevent any collisions during a fixed duration. Participants could perturb object trajectories via the touchscreen. In Experiment 1, we used a staircase procedure to measure the ability to control moving objects. Object speed was set to 1°/s. On average participants could control 8.4 items without collision. Individual control strategies were quite variable, but did not predict overall performance. In Experiment 2, we compared iMOT with standard MOT performance using identical displays. Object speed was set to 2°/s. Participants could reliably control more objects (M = 6.6) than they could track (M = 4.0), but performance in the two tasks was positively correlated. In Experiment 3, we used a dual-task design. Compared to single-task baseline, iMOT performance decreased and MOT performance increased when the two tasks had to be completed together. Overall, these findings suggest: 1) There is a clear limit to the number of items that can be simultaneously controlled, for a given speed and display density; 2) participants can control more items than they can track; 3) task-relevant action appears not to disrupt MOT performance in the current experimental context. Public Library of Science 2014-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3911935/ /pubmed/24498288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086974 Text en © 2014 Thornton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thornton, Ian M.
Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
Horowitz, Todd S.
Rynning, Aksel
Lee, Seong-Whan
Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title_full Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title_fullStr Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title_full_unstemmed Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title_short Interactive Multiple Object Tracking (iMOT)
title_sort interactive multiple object tracking (imot)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3911935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086974
work_keys_str_mv AT thorntonianm interactivemultipleobjecttrackingimot
AT bulthoffheinrichh interactivemultipleobjecttrackingimot
AT horowitztodds interactivemultipleobjecttrackingimot
AT rynningaksel interactivemultipleobjecttrackingimot
AT leeseongwhan interactivemultipleobjecttrackingimot