Cargando…
Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion?
Signa are sclerotized structures located on the inner wall of the corpus bursa of female Lepidoptera whose main function is tearing open spermatophores. The sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC) hypothesis proposes that the thickness of spermatophore envelopes has driven the evolution of the femal...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498577 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.247 |
_version_ | 1782302085171118080 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez, Víctor Cordero, Carlos |
author_facet | Sánchez, Víctor Cordero, Carlos |
author_sort | Sánchez, Víctor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Signa are sclerotized structures located on the inner wall of the corpus bursa of female Lepidoptera whose main function is tearing open spermatophores. The sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC) hypothesis proposes that the thickness of spermatophore envelopes has driven the evolution of the females signa; this idea is based in the fact that in many lepidopterans female sexual receptivity is at least partially controlled by the volume of ejaculate remaining in the corpus bursa. According to the SAC hypothesis, males evolved thick spermatophore envelopes to delay the post-mating recovery of female sexual receptivity thus reducing sperm competition; in response, females evolved signa for breaking spermatophore envelopes faster, gaining access to the resources contained in them and reducing their intermating intervals; the evolution of signa, in turn, favored the evolution of even thicker spermatophore envelopes, and so on. We tested two predictions of the SAC hypothesis with comparative data on the thickness of spermatophore envelopes of eleven species of Heliconiinae butterflies. The first prediction is that the spermatophore envelopes of polyandrous species with signa will be thicker than those of monandrous species without signa. In agreement with this prediction, we found that the spermatophore envelopes of a polyandrous Heliconius species with signa are thicker than those of two monandrous Heliconius species without signa. The second prediction is that in some species with signa males could enforce monandry in females by evolving “very thick” spermatophore envelopes, in these species we predict that their spermatophore envelopes will be thicker than those of their closer polyandrous relatives with signa. In agreement with this prediction, we found that in two out of three comparisons, spermatophore envelopes of monandrous species with signa have thicker spermatophore envelopes than their closer polyandrous relatives with signa. Thus, our results support the idea that selective pressures arising from sexually antagonistic interactions have been important in the evolution of spermatophore envelopes, female signa and female mating patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3912446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39124462014-02-04 Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? Sánchez, Víctor Cordero, Carlos PeerJ Animal Behavior Signa are sclerotized structures located on the inner wall of the corpus bursa of female Lepidoptera whose main function is tearing open spermatophores. The sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC) hypothesis proposes that the thickness of spermatophore envelopes has driven the evolution of the females signa; this idea is based in the fact that in many lepidopterans female sexual receptivity is at least partially controlled by the volume of ejaculate remaining in the corpus bursa. According to the SAC hypothesis, males evolved thick spermatophore envelopes to delay the post-mating recovery of female sexual receptivity thus reducing sperm competition; in response, females evolved signa for breaking spermatophore envelopes faster, gaining access to the resources contained in them and reducing their intermating intervals; the evolution of signa, in turn, favored the evolution of even thicker spermatophore envelopes, and so on. We tested two predictions of the SAC hypothesis with comparative data on the thickness of spermatophore envelopes of eleven species of Heliconiinae butterflies. The first prediction is that the spermatophore envelopes of polyandrous species with signa will be thicker than those of monandrous species without signa. In agreement with this prediction, we found that the spermatophore envelopes of a polyandrous Heliconius species with signa are thicker than those of two monandrous Heliconius species without signa. The second prediction is that in some species with signa males could enforce monandry in females by evolving “very thick” spermatophore envelopes, in these species we predict that their spermatophore envelopes will be thicker than those of their closer polyandrous relatives with signa. In agreement with this prediction, we found that in two out of three comparisons, spermatophore envelopes of monandrous species with signa have thicker spermatophore envelopes than their closer polyandrous relatives with signa. Thus, our results support the idea that selective pressures arising from sexually antagonistic interactions have been important in the evolution of spermatophore envelopes, female signa and female mating patterns. PeerJ Inc. 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3912446/ /pubmed/24498577 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.247 Text en © 2014 Sánchez et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Sánchez, Víctor Cordero, Carlos Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title | Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title_full | Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title_fullStr | Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title_short | Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion? |
title_sort | sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: evidence of male coercion? |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498577 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezvictor sexualcoevolutionofspermatophoreenvelopesandfemalegenitaltraitsinbutterfliesevidenceofmalecoercion AT corderocarlos sexualcoevolutionofspermatophoreenvelopesandfemalegenitaltraitsinbutterfliesevidenceofmalecoercion |