Cargando…
A study of agreement between the Naranjo algorithm and WHO-UMC criteria for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions
OBJECTIVES: Reliability and usefulness of various adverse drug reaction (ADR) causality assessment scales have not been fully explored. There is no universally accepted method for causality grading of ADRs. In the present study we assessed agreement between the two widely used causality assessment s...
Autores principales: | Belhekar, Mahesh N., Taur, Santosh R., Munshi, Renuka P. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.125192 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Agreement between WHO-UMC causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions
por: Shukla, Ajay K., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparison of agreement and rational uses of the WHO and Naranjo adverse event causality assessment tools
por: Mittal, Niti, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A prospective study of adverse drug reactions to artemisinin-based combination therapy in a tertiary care hospital in India
por: Belhekar, Mahesh N., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Improving the assessment of adverse drug reactions using the Naranjo Algorithm in daily practice: The Japan Adverse Drug Events Study
por: Murayama, Hiroki, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
International Conference UMC 2013
por: Bigot, Jean-Yves, et al.
Publicado: (2015)