Cargando…

Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique

Purpose. Obesity is being considered a “global epidemic.” Surgical procedures are rendered more difficult in obese patients. We aimed to see whether any benefits were evident with use of computer navigation during total knee replacement in these cases. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 287 TKR pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamat, Yogeesh D., Aurakzai, Kamran M., Adhikari, Ajeya R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/272838
_version_ 1782302164127842304
author Kamat, Yogeesh D.
Aurakzai, Kamran M.
Adhikari, Ajeya R.
author_facet Kamat, Yogeesh D.
Aurakzai, Kamran M.
Adhikari, Ajeya R.
author_sort Kamat, Yogeesh D.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Obesity is being considered a “global epidemic.” Surgical procedures are rendered more difficult in obese patients. We aimed to see whether any benefits were evident with use of computer navigation during total knee replacement in these cases. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 287 TKR performed by a single surgeon was undertaken, including 133 TKR undertaken with computer navigation and 154 using standard instrumentation. Each group was further divided into subgroups depending on whether the patients were obese or nonobese. Results. We found that TKR in obese patients took longer with standard instruments, but not with computer navigation. A chronological analysis revealed that the surgeon progressively got quicker using computer navigation to the point that there was no difference in time with either of the operative techniques in obese patients. The mid-term clinical outcomes at five years were similar. Computer navigated TKR were more consistently accurately aligned. Conclusions. In obese patients, a dual advantage is provided by computer navigation: better alignment and no time penalty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39130152014-02-12 Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique Kamat, Yogeesh D. Aurakzai, Kamran M. Adhikari, Ajeya R. ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study Purpose. Obesity is being considered a “global epidemic.” Surgical procedures are rendered more difficult in obese patients. We aimed to see whether any benefits were evident with use of computer navigation during total knee replacement in these cases. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 287 TKR performed by a single surgeon was undertaken, including 133 TKR undertaken with computer navigation and 154 using standard instrumentation. Each group was further divided into subgroups depending on whether the patients were obese or nonobese. Results. We found that TKR in obese patients took longer with standard instruments, but not with computer navigation. A chronological analysis revealed that the surgeon progressively got quicker using computer navigation to the point that there was no difference in time with either of the operative techniques in obese patients. The mid-term clinical outcomes at five years were similar. Computer navigated TKR were more consistently accurately aligned. Conclusions. In obese patients, a dual advantage is provided by computer navigation: better alignment and no time penalty. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3913015/ /pubmed/24523634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/272838 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yogeesh D. Kamat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kamat, Yogeesh D.
Aurakzai, Kamran M.
Adhikari, Ajeya R.
Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title_full Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title_fullStr Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title_full_unstemmed Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title_short Total Knee Replacement in the Obese Patient: Comparing Computer Assisted and Conventional Technique
title_sort total knee replacement in the obese patient: comparing computer assisted and conventional technique
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/272838
work_keys_str_mv AT kamatyogeeshd totalkneereplacementintheobesepatientcomparingcomputerassistedandconventionaltechnique
AT aurakzaikamranm totalkneereplacementintheobesepatientcomparingcomputerassistedandconventionaltechnique
AT adhikariajeyar totalkneereplacementintheobesepatientcomparingcomputerassistedandconventionaltechnique