Access to rheumatologists among patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis in a Canadian universal public healthcare system

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to estimate the percentage of patients with incident rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were seen by a rheumatologist within 3, 6 and 12 months of suspected diagnosis by a family physician, and assess what factors may influence the time frame with which patients are seen. SE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widdifield, Jessica, Paterson, J Michael, Bernatsky, Sasha, Tu, Karen, Thorne, J Carter, Ivers, Noah, Butt, Debra, Jaakkimainen, R Liisa, Gunraj, Nadia, Ahluwalia, Vandana, Bombardier, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Rheumatology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24486677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003888
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to estimate the percentage of patients with incident rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were seen by a rheumatologist within 3, 6 and 12 months of suspected diagnosis by a family physician, and assess what factors may influence the time frame with which patients are seen. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Over 2000–2009, we studied patients with incident RA who were initially diagnosed by a family physician. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed secular trends in rheumatology encounters and differences between patients who received versus did not receive rheumatology care. We performed hierarchical logistic regression analyses to determine whether receipt of rheumatology care was associated with patient, primary care physician and geographical factors. RESULTS: Among 19 760 patients with incident RA, 59%, 75% and 84% of patients were seen by a rheumatologist within 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. The prevalence of initial consultations within 3 months did not increase over time; however, access within 6 and 12 months increased over time. Factors positively associated with timely consultations included higher regional rheumatology supply (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.35 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.60)) and higher patient socioeconomic status (aOR 1.18 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.30)). Conversely, factors inversely associated with timely consultations included remote patient residence (aOR 0.51 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.64)) and male family physicians (aOR 0.88 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.95)). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing access to rheumatologists within 6 and 12 months occurred over time; however, consultations within 3 months did not change over time. Measures of poor access (such as proximity to and density of rheumatologists) were negatively associated with timely consultations. Additional factors that contributed to disparities in access included patient socioeconomic status and physician sex.

Ejemplares similares