Cargando…

Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics

BACKGROUND: Mentoring is important for personal and professional development of doctors. Peer mentoring is a core skill in the UK paediatric postgraduate curriculum. However, there is a paucity of peer mentoring programmes aimed at postgraduate doctors in training (postgraduate trainees), and there...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eisen, Sarah, Sukhani, Seema, Brightwell, Alex, Stoneham, Sara, Long, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304277
_version_ 1782302199175446528
author Eisen, Sarah
Sukhani, Seema
Brightwell, Alex
Stoneham, Sara
Long, Andrew
author_facet Eisen, Sarah
Sukhani, Seema
Brightwell, Alex
Stoneham, Sara
Long, Andrew
author_sort Eisen, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mentoring is important for personal and professional development of doctors. Peer mentoring is a core skill in the UK paediatric postgraduate curriculum. However, there is a paucity of peer mentoring programmes aimed at postgraduate doctors in training (postgraduate trainees), and there are no such schemes within paediatrics described in the literature. We developed a regional peer mentoring programme for postgraduate trainees in paediatrics to assess demand and need for peer mentoring and to explore the benefits for both peer mentees and mentors. PROGRAMME DESIGN: Junior postgraduate trainees, randomly selected from volunteers, received peer mentoring from more senior trainees for 1 year. Peer mentors were selected by competitive application and undertook tailored training followed by an experiential learning programme. The programme was evaluated using structured questionnaires. RESULTS: 90% (76/84) of first-year postgraduate trainees in paediatrics applied to participate, demonstrating high demand. 18 peer mentor–mentee pairs were matched. Peer mentors and mentees reported high satisfaction rates, acquisition of new and transferable skills and changed behaviours. All peer mentors intended to use the skills in their workplace and, later, as an educational supervisor. CONCLUSIONS: Our programme represents a novel approach to meeting the demonstrated demand and the curriculum requirement for peer mentoring, and enabled peer mentors and mentees to develop a valuable and versatile skill set. To our knowledge, it is the first such programme in paediatrics and provides a feasibility model that may be adapted locally to allow education providers to offer this important experience to postgraduate trainees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39132872014-02-06 Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics Eisen, Sarah Sukhani, Seema Brightwell, Alex Stoneham, Sara Long, Andrew Arch Dis Child Original Article BACKGROUND: Mentoring is important for personal and professional development of doctors. Peer mentoring is a core skill in the UK paediatric postgraduate curriculum. However, there is a paucity of peer mentoring programmes aimed at postgraduate doctors in training (postgraduate trainees), and there are no such schemes within paediatrics described in the literature. We developed a regional peer mentoring programme for postgraduate trainees in paediatrics to assess demand and need for peer mentoring and to explore the benefits for both peer mentees and mentors. PROGRAMME DESIGN: Junior postgraduate trainees, randomly selected from volunteers, received peer mentoring from more senior trainees for 1 year. Peer mentors were selected by competitive application and undertook tailored training followed by an experiential learning programme. The programme was evaluated using structured questionnaires. RESULTS: 90% (76/84) of first-year postgraduate trainees in paediatrics applied to participate, demonstrating high demand. 18 peer mentor–mentee pairs were matched. Peer mentors and mentees reported high satisfaction rates, acquisition of new and transferable skills and changed behaviours. All peer mentors intended to use the skills in their workplace and, later, as an educational supervisor. CONCLUSIONS: Our programme represents a novel approach to meeting the demonstrated demand and the curriculum requirement for peer mentoring, and enabled peer mentors and mentees to develop a valuable and versatile skill set. To our knowledge, it is the first such programme in paediatrics and provides a feasibility model that may be adapted locally to allow education providers to offer this important experience to postgraduate trainees. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-02 2013-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3913287/ /pubmed/24152570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304277 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Eisen, Sarah
Sukhani, Seema
Brightwell, Alex
Stoneham, Sara
Long, Andrew
Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title_full Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title_fullStr Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title_full_unstemmed Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title_short Peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
title_sort peer mentoring: evaluation of a novel programme in paediatrics
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304277
work_keys_str_mv AT eisensarah peermentoringevaluationofanovelprogrammeinpaediatrics
AT sukhaniseema peermentoringevaluationofanovelprogrammeinpaediatrics
AT brightwellalex peermentoringevaluationofanovelprogrammeinpaediatrics
AT stonehamsara peermentoringevaluationofanovelprogrammeinpaediatrics
AT longandrew peermentoringevaluationofanovelprogrammeinpaediatrics