Cargando…
A Comparison of Four Methods for the Analysis of N-of-1 Trials
OBJECTIVE: To provide a practical guidance for the analysis of N-of-1 trials by comparing four commonly used models. METHODS: The four models, paired t-test, mixed effects model of difference, mixed effects model and meta-analysis of summary data were compared using a simulation study. The assumed 3...
Autores principales: | Chen, Xinlin, Chen, Pingyan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24503561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087752 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Series of N-of-1 Trials for Traditional Chinese Medicine Using a Bayesian Method: Study Rationale and Protocol
por: Lu, Lizhi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Methodological Considerations in N-of-1 Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine
por: Huang, Haiyin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Empirical comparison of four baseline covariate adjustment methods in analysis of continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials
por: Zhang, Shiyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Evaluating the Effects of Heat-Clearing Traditional Chinese Medicine in Stable Bronchiectasis by a Series of N-of-1 Trials
por: Zi, Suna, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Molecular analysis of FMR1 gene in a population in Southern Brazil: Comparison of four methods
por: Ramos, Cinthia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)