Cargando…

What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veerbeek, Janne Marieke, van Wegen, Erwin, van Peppen, Roland, van der Wees, Philip Jan, Hendriks, Erik, Rietberg, Marc, Kwakkel, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987
_version_ 1782302288504684544
author Veerbeek, Janne Marieke
van Wegen, Erwin
van Peppen, Roland
van der Wees, Philip Jan
Hendriks, Erik
Rietberg, Marc
Kwakkel, Gert
author_facet Veerbeek, Janne Marieke
van Wegen, Erwin
van Peppen, Roland
van der Wees, Philip Jan
Hendriks, Erik
Rietberg, Marc
Kwakkel, Gert
author_sort Veerbeek, Janne Marieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PT in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved through a systematic search. Outcomes were classified according to the ICF. RCTs with a low risk of bias were quantitatively analyzed. Differences between phases poststroke were explored in subgroup analyses. A best evidence synthesis was performed for neurological treatment approaches. The search yielded 467 RCTs (N = 25373; median PEDro score 6 [IQR 5–7]), identifying 53 interventions. No adverse events were reported. Strong evidence was found for significant positive effects of 13 interventions related to gait, 11 interventions related to arm-hand activities, 1 intervention for ADL, and 3 interventions for physical fitness. Summary Effect Sizes (SESs) ranged from 0.17 (95%CI 0.03–0.70; I(2) = 0%) for therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm to 2.47 (95%CI 0.84–4.11; I(2) = 77%) for training of sitting balance. There is strong evidence that a higher dose of practice is better, with SESs ranging from 0.21 (95%CI 0.02–0.39; I(2) = 6%) for motor function of the paretic arm to 0.61 (95%CI 0.41–0.82; I(2) = 41%) for muscle strength of the paretic leg. Subgroup analyses yielded significant differences with respect to timing poststroke for 10 interventions. Neurological treatment approaches to training of body functions and activities showed equal or unfavorable effects when compared to other training interventions. Main limitations of the present review are not using individual patient data for meta-analyses and absence of correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence for PT interventions favoring intensive high repetitive task-oriented and task-specific training in all phases poststroke. Effects are mostly restricted to the actually trained functions and activities. Suggestions for prioritizing PT stroke research are given.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39137862014-02-06 What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Veerbeek, Janne Marieke van Wegen, Erwin van Peppen, Roland van der Wees, Philip Jan Hendriks, Erik Rietberg, Marc Kwakkel, Gert PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Physical therapy (PT) is one of the key disciplines in interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an update of the evidence for stroke rehabilitation interventions in the domain of PT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding PT in stroke rehabilitation were retrieved through a systematic search. Outcomes were classified according to the ICF. RCTs with a low risk of bias were quantitatively analyzed. Differences between phases poststroke were explored in subgroup analyses. A best evidence synthesis was performed for neurological treatment approaches. The search yielded 467 RCTs (N = 25373; median PEDro score 6 [IQR 5–7]), identifying 53 interventions. No adverse events were reported. Strong evidence was found for significant positive effects of 13 interventions related to gait, 11 interventions related to arm-hand activities, 1 intervention for ADL, and 3 interventions for physical fitness. Summary Effect Sizes (SESs) ranged from 0.17 (95%CI 0.03–0.70; I(2) = 0%) for therapeutic positioning of the paretic arm to 2.47 (95%CI 0.84–4.11; I(2) = 77%) for training of sitting balance. There is strong evidence that a higher dose of practice is better, with SESs ranging from 0.21 (95%CI 0.02–0.39; I(2) = 6%) for motor function of the paretic arm to 0.61 (95%CI 0.41–0.82; I(2) = 41%) for muscle strength of the paretic leg. Subgroup analyses yielded significant differences with respect to timing poststroke for 10 interventions. Neurological treatment approaches to training of body functions and activities showed equal or unfavorable effects when compared to other training interventions. Main limitations of the present review are not using individual patient data for meta-analyses and absence of correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence for PT interventions favoring intensive high repetitive task-oriented and task-specific training in all phases poststroke. Effects are mostly restricted to the actually trained functions and activities. Suggestions for prioritizing PT stroke research are given. Public Library of Science 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3913786/ /pubmed/24505342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 Text en © 2014 Veerbeek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Veerbeek, Janne Marieke
van Wegen, Erwin
van Peppen, Roland
van der Wees, Philip Jan
Hendriks, Erik
Rietberg, Marc
Kwakkel, Gert
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort what is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087987
work_keys_str_mv AT veerbeekjannemarieke whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanwegenerwin whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanpeppenroland whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderweesphilipjan whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hendrikserik whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rietbergmarc whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kwakkelgert whatistheevidenceforphysicaltherapypoststrokeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis