Cargando…

Two systems drive attention to rewards

How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovach, Christopher K., Sutterer, Matthew J., Rushia, Sara N., Teriakidis, Adrianna, Jenison, Rick L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046
_version_ 1782302294899949568
author Kovach, Christopher K.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Rushia, Sara N.
Teriakidis, Adrianna
Jenison, Rick L.
author_facet Kovach, Christopher K.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Rushia, Sara N.
Teriakidis, Adrianna
Jenison, Rick L.
author_sort Kovach, Christopher K.
collection PubMed
description How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which preference should be uniformly biased towards the attended item over the whole time-course of a decision between similarly valued items. To test this prediction we considered how framing alters the orienting of gaze during a simple choice between two options, using eye movements as a sensitive online measure of attention. In one condition participants selected the less preferred item to discard and in the other, the more preferred item to keep. We found that gaze gravitates towards the item ultimately selected, but did not observe the effect to be uniform over time. Instead, we found evidence for distinct early and late processes that guide attention according to preference in the first case and task demands in the second. We conclude that multiple time-dependent processes govern attention during choice, and that these may contribute to framing effects in different ways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39138422014-02-18 Two systems drive attention to rewards Kovach, Christopher K. Sutterer, Matthew J. Rushia, Sara N. Teriakidis, Adrianna Jenison, Rick L. Front Psychol Neuroscience How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which preference should be uniformly biased towards the attended item over the whole time-course of a decision between similarly valued items. To test this prediction we considered how framing alters the orienting of gaze during a simple choice between two options, using eye movements as a sensitive online measure of attention. In one condition participants selected the less preferred item to discard and in the other, the more preferred item to keep. We found that gaze gravitates towards the item ultimately selected, but did not observe the effect to be uniform over time. Instead, we found evidence for distinct early and late processes that guide attention according to preference in the first case and task demands in the second. We conclude that multiple time-dependent processes govern attention during choice, and that these may contribute to framing effects in different ways. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3913842/ /pubmed/24550868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kovach, Sutterer, Rushia, Teriakidis and Jenison. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kovach, Christopher K.
Sutterer, Matthew J.
Rushia, Sara N.
Teriakidis, Adrianna
Jenison, Rick L.
Two systems drive attention to rewards
title Two systems drive attention to rewards
title_full Two systems drive attention to rewards
title_fullStr Two systems drive attention to rewards
title_full_unstemmed Two systems drive attention to rewards
title_short Two systems drive attention to rewards
title_sort two systems drive attention to rewards
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046
work_keys_str_mv AT kovachchristopherk twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards
AT sutterermatthewj twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards
AT rushiasaran twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards
AT teriakidisadrianna twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards
AT jenisonrickl twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards