Cargando…
Two systems drive attention to rewards
How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046 |
_version_ | 1782302294899949568 |
---|---|
author | Kovach, Christopher K. Sutterer, Matthew J. Rushia, Sara N. Teriakidis, Adrianna Jenison, Rick L. |
author_facet | Kovach, Christopher K. Sutterer, Matthew J. Rushia, Sara N. Teriakidis, Adrianna Jenison, Rick L. |
author_sort | Kovach, Christopher K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which preference should be uniformly biased towards the attended item over the whole time-course of a decision between similarly valued items. To test this prediction we considered how framing alters the orienting of gaze during a simple choice between two options, using eye movements as a sensitive online measure of attention. In one condition participants selected the less preferred item to discard and in the other, the more preferred item to keep. We found that gaze gravitates towards the item ultimately selected, but did not observe the effect to be uniform over time. Instead, we found evidence for distinct early and late processes that guide attention according to preference in the first case and task demands in the second. We conclude that multiple time-dependent processes govern attention during choice, and that these may contribute to framing effects in different ways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3913842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39138422014-02-18 Two systems drive attention to rewards Kovach, Christopher K. Sutterer, Matthew J. Rushia, Sara N. Teriakidis, Adrianna Jenison, Rick L. Front Psychol Neuroscience How options are framed can dramatically influence choice preference. While salience of information plays a central role in this effect, precisely how it is mediated by attentional processes remains unknown. Current models assume a simple relationship between attention and choice, according to which preference should be uniformly biased towards the attended item over the whole time-course of a decision between similarly valued items. To test this prediction we considered how framing alters the orienting of gaze during a simple choice between two options, using eye movements as a sensitive online measure of attention. In one condition participants selected the less preferred item to discard and in the other, the more preferred item to keep. We found that gaze gravitates towards the item ultimately selected, but did not observe the effect to be uniform over time. Instead, we found evidence for distinct early and late processes that guide attention according to preference in the first case and task demands in the second. We conclude that multiple time-dependent processes govern attention during choice, and that these may contribute to framing effects in different ways. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3913842/ /pubmed/24550868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kovach, Sutterer, Rushia, Teriakidis and Jenison. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kovach, Christopher K. Sutterer, Matthew J. Rushia, Sara N. Teriakidis, Adrianna Jenison, Rick L. Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title | Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title_full | Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title_fullStr | Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title_full_unstemmed | Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title_short | Two systems drive attention to rewards |
title_sort | two systems drive attention to rewards |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovachchristopherk twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards AT sutterermatthewj twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards AT rushiasaran twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards AT teriakidisadrianna twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards AT jenisonrickl twosystemsdriveattentiontorewards |