Cargando…

Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice

PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzemieniecki, K., Sevelda, P., Erdkamp, F., Smakal, M., Schwenkglenks, M., Puertas, J., Trojan, A., Szabo, Z., Bendall, K., Maenpaa, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24154740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2
_version_ 1782302295600398336
author Krzemieniecki, K.
Sevelda, P.
Erdkamp, F.
Smakal, M.
Schwenkglenks, M.
Puertas, J.
Trojan, A.
Szabo, Z.
Bendall, K.
Maenpaa, J.
author_facet Krzemieniecki, K.
Sevelda, P.
Erdkamp, F.
Smakal, M.
Schwenkglenks, M.
Puertas, J.
Trojan, A.
Szabo, Z.
Bendall, K.
Maenpaa, J.
author_sort Krzemieniecki, K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), or ovarian cancer were enrolled if myelotoxic chemotherapy was planned, and they had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥20 %. The primary outcome was FN incidence. RESULTS: In total, 1,347 patients were analysed (breast cancer, n = 829; NSCLC, n = 224; SCLC, n = 137; ovarian cancer, n = 157). Patients with breast cancer exhibited fewer individual FN risk factors than patients with other cancers and were far more likely to have received a high-FN-risk chemotherapy regimen. However, a substantial proportion of all patients (45–80 % across tumour types) did not receive G-CSF PP in alignment with investigator risk assessment and guideline recommendations. FN occurred in 127 patients overall (9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8–11 %), and incidence was higher in SCLC (15 %) than other tumour types (8 % in ovarian and NSCLC, 9 % in breast cancer). A post hoc analysis of G-CSF use indicated that G-CSF prophylaxis was not given within the recommended timeframe after chemotherapy (within 1–3 days) or was not continued across all cycles in 39 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: FN risk assessment was predominantly based on clinical judgement and individual risk factors, and guidelines regarding G-CSF PP for patients at high FN risk were not consistently followed. Improved education of physicians may enable more fully informed neutropenia management in patients with solid tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39138452014-02-10 Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice Krzemieniecki, K. Sevelda, P. Erdkamp, F. Smakal, M. Schwenkglenks, M. Puertas, J. Trojan, A. Szabo, Z. Bendall, K. Maenpaa, J. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), or ovarian cancer were enrolled if myelotoxic chemotherapy was planned, and they had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥20 %. The primary outcome was FN incidence. RESULTS: In total, 1,347 patients were analysed (breast cancer, n = 829; NSCLC, n = 224; SCLC, n = 137; ovarian cancer, n = 157). Patients with breast cancer exhibited fewer individual FN risk factors than patients with other cancers and were far more likely to have received a high-FN-risk chemotherapy regimen. However, a substantial proportion of all patients (45–80 % across tumour types) did not receive G-CSF PP in alignment with investigator risk assessment and guideline recommendations. FN occurred in 127 patients overall (9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8–11 %), and incidence was higher in SCLC (15 %) than other tumour types (8 % in ovarian and NSCLC, 9 % in breast cancer). A post hoc analysis of G-CSF use indicated that G-CSF prophylaxis was not given within the recommended timeframe after chemotherapy (within 1–3 days) or was not continued across all cycles in 39 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: FN risk assessment was predominantly based on clinical judgement and individual risk factors, and guidelines regarding G-CSF PP for patients at high FN risk were not consistently followed. Improved education of physicians may enable more fully informed neutropenia management in patients with solid tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-10-24 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3913845/ /pubmed/24154740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Krzemieniecki, K.
Sevelda, P.
Erdkamp, F.
Smakal, M.
Schwenkglenks, M.
Puertas, J.
Trojan, A.
Szabo, Z.
Bendall, K.
Maenpaa, J.
Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title_full Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title_fullStr Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title_short Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
title_sort neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24154740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2
work_keys_str_mv AT krzemienieckik neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT seveldap neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT erdkampf neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT smakalm neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT schwenkglenksm neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT puertasj neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT trojana neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT szaboz neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT bendallk neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice
AT maenpaaj neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice