Cargando…
Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice
PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24154740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2 |
_version_ | 1782302295600398336 |
---|---|
author | Krzemieniecki, K. Sevelda, P. Erdkamp, F. Smakal, M. Schwenkglenks, M. Puertas, J. Trojan, A. Szabo, Z. Bendall, K. Maenpaa, J. |
author_facet | Krzemieniecki, K. Sevelda, P. Erdkamp, F. Smakal, M. Schwenkglenks, M. Puertas, J. Trojan, A. Szabo, Z. Bendall, K. Maenpaa, J. |
author_sort | Krzemieniecki, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), or ovarian cancer were enrolled if myelotoxic chemotherapy was planned, and they had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥20 %. The primary outcome was FN incidence. RESULTS: In total, 1,347 patients were analysed (breast cancer, n = 829; NSCLC, n = 224; SCLC, n = 137; ovarian cancer, n = 157). Patients with breast cancer exhibited fewer individual FN risk factors than patients with other cancers and were far more likely to have received a high-FN-risk chemotherapy regimen. However, a substantial proportion of all patients (45–80 % across tumour types) did not receive G-CSF PP in alignment with investigator risk assessment and guideline recommendations. FN occurred in 127 patients overall (9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8–11 %), and incidence was higher in SCLC (15 %) than other tumour types (8 % in ovarian and NSCLC, 9 % in breast cancer). A post hoc analysis of G-CSF use indicated that G-CSF prophylaxis was not given within the recommended timeframe after chemotherapy (within 1–3 days) or was not continued across all cycles in 39 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: FN risk assessment was predominantly based on clinical judgement and individual risk factors, and guidelines regarding G-CSF PP for patients at high FN risk were not consistently followed. Improved education of physicians may enable more fully informed neutropenia management in patients with solid tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3913845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39138452014-02-10 Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice Krzemieniecki, K. Sevelda, P. Erdkamp, F. Smakal, M. Schwenkglenks, M. Puertas, J. Trojan, A. Szabo, Z. Bendall, K. Maenpaa, J. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated. METHODS: Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), or ovarian cancer were enrolled if myelotoxic chemotherapy was planned, and they had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥20 %. The primary outcome was FN incidence. RESULTS: In total, 1,347 patients were analysed (breast cancer, n = 829; NSCLC, n = 224; SCLC, n = 137; ovarian cancer, n = 157). Patients with breast cancer exhibited fewer individual FN risk factors than patients with other cancers and were far more likely to have received a high-FN-risk chemotherapy regimen. However, a substantial proportion of all patients (45–80 % across tumour types) did not receive G-CSF PP in alignment with investigator risk assessment and guideline recommendations. FN occurred in 127 patients overall (9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8–11 %), and incidence was higher in SCLC (15 %) than other tumour types (8 % in ovarian and NSCLC, 9 % in breast cancer). A post hoc analysis of G-CSF use indicated that G-CSF prophylaxis was not given within the recommended timeframe after chemotherapy (within 1–3 days) or was not continued across all cycles in 39 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: FN risk assessment was predominantly based on clinical judgement and individual risk factors, and guidelines regarding G-CSF PP for patients at high FN risk were not consistently followed. Improved education of physicians may enable more fully informed neutropenia management in patients with solid tumours. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-10-24 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3913845/ /pubmed/24154740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Krzemieniecki, K. Sevelda, P. Erdkamp, F. Smakal, M. Schwenkglenks, M. Puertas, J. Trojan, A. Szabo, Z. Bendall, K. Maenpaa, J. Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title | Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title_full | Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title_short | Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
title_sort | neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy—findings from clinical practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24154740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2021-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krzemienieckik neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT seveldap neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT erdkampf neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT smakalm neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT schwenkglenksm neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT puertasj neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT trojana neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT szaboz neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT bendallk neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice AT maenpaaj neutropeniamanagementandgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactoruseinpatientswithsolidtumoursreceivingmyelotoxicchemotherapyfindingsfromclinicalpractice |