Cargando…

Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging

Frequency tagging of sensory inputs (presenting stimuli that fluctuate periodically at rates to which the cortex can phase lock) has been used to study attentional modulation of neural responses to inputs in different sensory modalities. For visual inputs, the visual steady-state response (VSSR) at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bharadwaj, Hari M., Lee, Adrian K. C., Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00006
_version_ 1782302299494809600
author Bharadwaj, Hari M.
Lee, Adrian K. C.
Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
author_facet Bharadwaj, Hari M.
Lee, Adrian K. C.
Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
author_sort Bharadwaj, Hari M.
collection PubMed
description Frequency tagging of sensory inputs (presenting stimuli that fluctuate periodically at rates to which the cortex can phase lock) has been used to study attentional modulation of neural responses to inputs in different sensory modalities. For visual inputs, the visual steady-state response (VSSR) at the frequency modulating an attended object is enhanced, while the VSSR to a distracting object is suppressed. In contrast, the effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is inconsistent across studies. However, most auditory studies analyzed results at the sensor level or used only a small number of equivalent current dipoles to fit cortical responses. In addition, most studies of auditory spatial attention used dichotic stimuli (independent signals at the ears) rather than more natural, binaural stimuli. Here, we asked whether these methodological choices help explain discrepant results. Listeners attended to one of two competing speech streams, one simulated from the left and one from the right, that were modulated at different frequencies. Using distributed source modeling of magnetoencephalography results, we estimate how spatially directed attention modulates the ASSR in neural regions across the whole brain. Attention enhances the ASSR power at the frequency of the attended stream in contralateral auditory cortex. The attended-stream modulation frequency also drives phase-locked responses in the left (but not right) precentral sulcus (lPCS), a region implicated in control of eye gaze and visual spatial attention. Importantly, this region shows no phase locking to the distracting stream. Results suggest that the lPCS in engaged in an attention-specific manner. Modeling results that take account of the geometry and phases of the cortical sources phase locked to the two streams (including hemispheric asymmetry of lPCS activity) help to explain why past ASSR studies of auditory spatial attention yield seemingly contradictory results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39138822014-02-18 Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging Bharadwaj, Hari M. Lee, Adrian K. C. Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience Frequency tagging of sensory inputs (presenting stimuli that fluctuate periodically at rates to which the cortex can phase lock) has been used to study attentional modulation of neural responses to inputs in different sensory modalities. For visual inputs, the visual steady-state response (VSSR) at the frequency modulating an attended object is enhanced, while the VSSR to a distracting object is suppressed. In contrast, the effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is inconsistent across studies. However, most auditory studies analyzed results at the sensor level or used only a small number of equivalent current dipoles to fit cortical responses. In addition, most studies of auditory spatial attention used dichotic stimuli (independent signals at the ears) rather than more natural, binaural stimuli. Here, we asked whether these methodological choices help explain discrepant results. Listeners attended to one of two competing speech streams, one simulated from the left and one from the right, that were modulated at different frequencies. Using distributed source modeling of magnetoencephalography results, we estimate how spatially directed attention modulates the ASSR in neural regions across the whole brain. Attention enhances the ASSR power at the frequency of the attended stream in contralateral auditory cortex. The attended-stream modulation frequency also drives phase-locked responses in the left (but not right) precentral sulcus (lPCS), a region implicated in control of eye gaze and visual spatial attention. Importantly, this region shows no phase locking to the distracting stream. Results suggest that the lPCS in engaged in an attention-specific manner. Modeling results that take account of the geometry and phases of the cortical sources phase locked to the two streams (including hemispheric asymmetry of lPCS activity) help to explain why past ASSR studies of auditory spatial attention yield seemingly contradictory results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3913882/ /pubmed/24550794 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00006 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bharadwaj, Lee and Shinn-Cunningham. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bharadwaj, Hari M.
Lee, Adrian K. C.
Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title_full Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title_fullStr Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title_full_unstemmed Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title_short Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
title_sort measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24550794
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00006
work_keys_str_mv AT bharadwajharim measuringauditoryselectiveattentionusingfrequencytagging
AT leeadriankc measuringauditoryselectiveattentionusingfrequencytagging
AT shinncunninghambarbarag measuringauditoryselectiveattentionusingfrequencytagging