Cargando…

Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample

OBJECTIVE: To measure Irish opinion on a range of assisted human reproduction (AHR) treatments. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of Irish adults (n=1,003) were anonymously sampled by telephone survey. RESULTS: Most participants (77%) agreed that any fertility services offered internationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walsh, David J, Sills, E Scott, Collins, Gary S, Hawrylyshyn, Christine A, Sokol, Piotr, Walsh, Anthony PH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505563
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.4.169
_version_ 1782302302688772096
author Walsh, David J
Sills, E Scott
Collins, Gary S
Hawrylyshyn, Christine A
Sokol, Piotr
Walsh, Anthony PH
author_facet Walsh, David J
Sills, E Scott
Collins, Gary S
Hawrylyshyn, Christine A
Sokol, Piotr
Walsh, Anthony PH
author_sort Walsh, David J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To measure Irish opinion on a range of assisted human reproduction (AHR) treatments. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of Irish adults (n=1,003) were anonymously sampled by telephone survey. RESULTS: Most participants (77%) agreed that any fertility services offered internationally should also be available in Ireland, although only a small minority of the general Irish population had personal familiarity with AHR or infertility. This sample finds substantial agreement (63%) that the Government of Ireland should introduce legislation covering AHR. The range of support for gamete donation in Ireland ranged from 53% to 83%, depending on how donor privacy and disclosure policies are presented. For example, donation where the donor agrees to be contacted by the child born following donation, and anonymous donation where donor privacy is completely protected by law were supported by 68% and 66%, respectively. The least popular (53%) donor gamete treatment type appeared to be donation where the donor consents to be involved in the future life of any child born as a result of donor fertility treatment. Respondents in social class ABC1 (58%), age 18 to 24 (62%), age 25 to 34 (60%), or without children (61%) were more likely to favour this donor treatment policy in our sample. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide assessment of Irish public opinion on the advanced reproductive technologies since 2005. Access to a wide range of AHR treatment was supported by all subgroups studied. Public opinion concerning specific types of AHR treatment varied, yet general support for the need for national AHR legislation was reported by 63% of this national sample. Contemporary views on AHR remain largely consistent with the Commission for Assisted Human Reproduction recommendations from 2005, although further research is needed to clarify exactly how popular opinion on these issues has changed. It appears that legislation allowing for the full range of donation options (and not mandating disclosure of donor identity at a stipulated age) would better align with current Irish public opinion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3913896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39138962014-02-06 Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample Walsh, David J Sills, E Scott Collins, Gary S Hawrylyshyn, Christine A Sokol, Piotr Walsh, Anthony PH Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure Irish opinion on a range of assisted human reproduction (AHR) treatments. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of Irish adults (n=1,003) were anonymously sampled by telephone survey. RESULTS: Most participants (77%) agreed that any fertility services offered internationally should also be available in Ireland, although only a small minority of the general Irish population had personal familiarity with AHR or infertility. This sample finds substantial agreement (63%) that the Government of Ireland should introduce legislation covering AHR. The range of support for gamete donation in Ireland ranged from 53% to 83%, depending on how donor privacy and disclosure policies are presented. For example, donation where the donor agrees to be contacted by the child born following donation, and anonymous donation where donor privacy is completely protected by law were supported by 68% and 66%, respectively. The least popular (53%) donor gamete treatment type appeared to be donation where the donor consents to be involved in the future life of any child born as a result of donor fertility treatment. Respondents in social class ABC1 (58%), age 18 to 24 (62%), age 25 to 34 (60%), or without children (61%) were more likely to favour this donor treatment policy in our sample. CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide assessment of Irish public opinion on the advanced reproductive technologies since 2005. Access to a wide range of AHR treatment was supported by all subgroups studied. Public opinion concerning specific types of AHR treatment varied, yet general support for the need for national AHR legislation was reported by 63% of this national sample. Contemporary views on AHR remain largely consistent with the Commission for Assisted Human Reproduction recommendations from 2005, although further research is needed to clarify exactly how popular opinion on these issues has changed. It appears that legislation allowing for the full range of donation options (and not mandating disclosure of donor identity at a stipulated age) would better align with current Irish public opinion. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2013-12 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3913896/ /pubmed/24505563 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.4.169 Text en Copyright © 2013. The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Walsh, David J
Sills, E Scott
Collins, Gary S
Hawrylyshyn, Christine A
Sokol, Piotr
Walsh, Anthony PH
Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title_full Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title_fullStr Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title_full_unstemmed Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title_short Irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: Contemporary assessments from a national sample
title_sort irish public opinion on assisted human reproduction services: contemporary assessments from a national sample
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3913896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505563
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.4.169
work_keys_str_mv AT walshdavidj irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample
AT sillsescott irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample
AT collinsgarys irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample
AT hawrylyshynchristinea irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample
AT sokolpiotr irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample
AT walshanthonyph irishpublicopiniononassistedhumanreproductionservicescontemporaryassessmentsfromanationalsample