Cargando…

Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series

Aims. To describe the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab (SCB) injection in the combined cataract and glaucoma filtering surgery (GFS). Methods. Retrospective comparative case series. Thirty eyes of twenty-eight patients who had GFS followed by SCB injection as part of post-operative management were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jing, Harasymowycz, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/384134
_version_ 1782302369474674688
author Wang, Jing
Harasymowycz, Paul
author_facet Wang, Jing
Harasymowycz, Paul
author_sort Wang, Jing
collection PubMed
description Aims. To describe the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab (SCB) injection in the combined cataract and glaucoma filtering surgery (GFS). Methods. Retrospective comparative case series. Thirty eyes of twenty-eight patients who had GFS followed by SCB injection as part of post-operative management were included (Group SCB). The types of GFS included trabeculectomy and non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS) with mitomycin-C. Outcome measures included the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications. Age-matched patients who had the same types of surgery without SCB were selected as a control group (Group C). Results. The types of GFS were: combined cataract surgery and NPGS (SCB: 20; C: 24), phacotrabeculectomy (SCB: 6; C: 3), NPGS (SCB: 3; C: 2) and trabeculectomy alone (SCB: 1; C: 1). The average follow-up time was 16.9 (±8.2) months in the SCB group and 19.6 (±11.5) months in the controls. 1.25 mg of bevacizumab was injected on average 14.1 (range: 3–42) days post-GFS. The mean IOP decreased from 21.9 (±9.8) to 11.9 (±4.7) mmHg in the controls and from 19.6 (±8.9) to 14.0 (±4.7) mmHg in the SCB group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.11). Complications included three cases of branch vein occlusion in the SCB group. Conclusions. SCB did not result in better outcome in term of IOP reduction. Clinicians should monitor its side effects in glaucoma patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3914244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39142442014-02-23 Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series Wang, Jing Harasymowycz, Paul ISRN Ophthalmol Clinical Study Aims. To describe the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab (SCB) injection in the combined cataract and glaucoma filtering surgery (GFS). Methods. Retrospective comparative case series. Thirty eyes of twenty-eight patients who had GFS followed by SCB injection as part of post-operative management were included (Group SCB). The types of GFS included trabeculectomy and non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS) with mitomycin-C. Outcome measures included the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications. Age-matched patients who had the same types of surgery without SCB were selected as a control group (Group C). Results. The types of GFS were: combined cataract surgery and NPGS (SCB: 20; C: 24), phacotrabeculectomy (SCB: 6; C: 3), NPGS (SCB: 3; C: 2) and trabeculectomy alone (SCB: 1; C: 1). The average follow-up time was 16.9 (±8.2) months in the SCB group and 19.6 (±11.5) months in the controls. 1.25 mg of bevacizumab was injected on average 14.1 (range: 3–42) days post-GFS. The mean IOP decreased from 21.9 (±9.8) to 11.9 (±4.7) mmHg in the controls and from 19.6 (±8.9) to 14.0 (±4.7) mmHg in the SCB group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.11). Complications included three cases of branch vein occlusion in the SCB group. Conclusions. SCB did not result in better outcome in term of IOP reduction. Clinicians should monitor its side effects in glaucoma patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3914244/ /pubmed/24563791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/384134 Text en Copyright © 2013 J. Wang and P. Harasymowycz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Wang, Jing
Harasymowycz, Paul
Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title_full Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title_fullStr Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title_full_unstemmed Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title_short Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection in Glaucoma Filtering Surgery: A Case Control Series
title_sort subconjunctival bevacizumab injection in glaucoma filtering surgery: a case control series
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/384134
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjing subconjunctivalbevacizumabinjectioninglaucomafilteringsurgeryacasecontrolseries
AT harasymowyczpaul subconjunctivalbevacizumabinjectioninglaucomafilteringsurgeryacasecontrolseries