Cargando…

Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases

The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays—INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELIS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caro Pérez, Alejandro, Kumble, Sarita, Kumble, Krishnanand D., Alonso Cañizal, M. Consuelo, Jiménez Jiménez, Luis M., Alonso Díez, Lorena, Durán Parejo, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24527209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787
_version_ 1782302379904860160
author Caro Pérez, Alejandro
Kumble, Sarita
Kumble, Krishnanand D.
Alonso Cañizal, M. Consuelo
Jiménez Jiménez, Luis M.
Alonso Díez, Lorena
Durán Parejo, Pilar
author_facet Caro Pérez, Alejandro
Kumble, Sarita
Kumble, Krishnanand D.
Alonso Cañizal, M. Consuelo
Jiménez Jiménez, Luis M.
Alonso Díez, Lorena
Durán Parejo, Pilar
author_sort Caro Pérez, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays—INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA—for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21–0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3914292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39142922014-02-13 Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases Caro Pérez, Alejandro Kumble, Sarita Kumble, Krishnanand D. Alonso Cañizal, M. Consuelo Jiménez Jiménez, Luis M. Alonso Díez, Lorena Durán Parejo, Pilar Autoimmune Dis Research Article The performance of immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and assessment of patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTD). Our objective was to compare the features of two multiplexed assays—INNO-LIA ANA and Gennova-PictArray ENA ELISA—for measurement of multiple autoantibodies and their utility as a clinical tool in ACTD diagnosis. The antigens included SS-A/Ro (60 and 52), SSB/La, Sm, Sm/RNP, CENP-B, Jo-1, and Scl-70. Stored sera from 85 ACTD patients and 80 controls consisting of patients with vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis and infectious diseases, as well as healthy subjects were analyzed jointly with clinical and laboratory data. Agreement between the two methods varied between 58 and 99% (Cohen's kappa: 0.21–0.71) mostly for SSA and SSB. The frequency of specific autoantibodies measured using the two methods was more variable for SSA, SSB, and RNP/Sm. There were a higher number of ambiguous results when using INNO-LIA. The optimized cut-off values of the Gennova-PictArray resulted in over 99% specificities in samples obtained from the control group. Sensitivity patterns were more accurate in Gennova-PictArray than in INNO-LIA, as suggested in previously reported studies. A third method could be applied to determine which of the two methods is more accurate. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3914292/ /pubmed/24527209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787 Text en Copyright © 2014 Alejandro Caro Pérez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Caro Pérez, Alejandro
Kumble, Sarita
Kumble, Krishnanand D.
Alonso Cañizal, M. Consuelo
Jiménez Jiménez, Luis M.
Alonso Díez, Lorena
Durán Parejo, Pilar
Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title_full Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title_short Evaluation of a Multiplex ELISA for Autoantibody Profiling in Patients with Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
title_sort evaluation of a multiplex elisa for autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24527209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/896787
work_keys_str_mv AT caroperezalejandro evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT kumblesarita evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT kumblekrishnanandd evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT alonsocanizalmconsuelo evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT jimenezjimenezluism evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT alonsodiezlorena evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases
AT duranparejopilar evaluationofamultiplexelisaforautoantibodyprofilinginpatientswithautoimmuneconnectivetissuediseases