Cargando…
How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027 |
_version_ | 1782302481573740544 |
---|---|
author | Cho, Hyun-Woo Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Lim, Byungmook Heo, Kwang-Ho Liu, Jian-Ping Tsutani, Kiichiro Lee, Myeong Soo Shin, Byung-Cheul |
author_facet | Cho, Hyun-Woo Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Lim, Byungmook Heo, Kwang-Ho Liu, Jian-Ping Tsutani, Kiichiro Lee, Myeong Soo Shin, Byung-Cheul |
author_sort | Cho, Hyun-Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyze the impact of this gap on present CPGs. METHODS: We examined 5 representative TM interventions in the health care systems of East-Asian countries. We searched seven relevant databases for CPGs to identify whether core CPGs included evidence of TM interventions, and we searched 11 databases for SR-MAs to re-evaluate current evidence on TM interventions. We then compared the gap between the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs and 22 SR-MAs met our inclusion criteria. Of the 13 CPGs, 7 CPGs (54%) mentioned TM interventions, and all were for acupuncture (only one was for both acupuncture and acupressure). However, the CPGs did not recommend acupuncture (or acupressure). Of 22 SR-MAs, 16 were for acupuncture, 5 for manual therapy, 1 for cupping, and none for moxibustion and herbal medicine. Comparing the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs, an underestimation or omission of evidence for acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy in current CPGs was detected. Thus, applying the results from the SR-MAs, we moderately recommend acupuncture for chronic LBP, but we inconclusively recommend acupuncture for (sub)acute LBP due to the limited current evidence. Furthermore, we weakly recommend cupping and manual therapy for both (sub)acute and chronic LBP. We cannot provide recommendations for moxibustion and herbal medicine due to a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPGs did not fully reflect the evidence for TM interventions. As relevant studies such as SR-MAs are conducted and evidence increases, the current evidence on acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy should be rigorously considered in the process of developing or updating the CPG system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3914865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39148652014-02-06 How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews Cho, Hyun-Woo Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Lim, Byungmook Heo, Kwang-Ho Liu, Jian-Ping Tsutani, Kiichiro Lee, Myeong Soo Shin, Byung-Cheul PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyze the impact of this gap on present CPGs. METHODS: We examined 5 representative TM interventions in the health care systems of East-Asian countries. We searched seven relevant databases for CPGs to identify whether core CPGs included evidence of TM interventions, and we searched 11 databases for SR-MAs to re-evaluate current evidence on TM interventions. We then compared the gap between the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs and 22 SR-MAs met our inclusion criteria. Of the 13 CPGs, 7 CPGs (54%) mentioned TM interventions, and all were for acupuncture (only one was for both acupuncture and acupressure). However, the CPGs did not recommend acupuncture (or acupressure). Of 22 SR-MAs, 16 were for acupuncture, 5 for manual therapy, 1 for cupping, and none for moxibustion and herbal medicine. Comparing the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs, an underestimation or omission of evidence for acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy in current CPGs was detected. Thus, applying the results from the SR-MAs, we moderately recommend acupuncture for chronic LBP, but we inconclusively recommend acupuncture for (sub)acute LBP due to the limited current evidence. Furthermore, we weakly recommend cupping and manual therapy for both (sub)acute and chronic LBP. We cannot provide recommendations for moxibustion and herbal medicine due to a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPGs did not fully reflect the evidence for TM interventions. As relevant studies such as SR-MAs are conducted and evidence increases, the current evidence on acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy should be rigorously considered in the process of developing or updating the CPG system. Public Library of Science 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3914865/ /pubmed/24505363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027 Text en © 2014 Cho et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cho, Hyun-Woo Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Lim, Byungmook Heo, Kwang-Ho Liu, Jian-Ping Tsutani, Kiichiro Lee, Myeong Soo Shin, Byung-Cheul How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title | How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title_full | How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title_fullStr | How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title_short | How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews |
title_sort | how current clinical practice guidelines for low back pain reflect traditional medicine in east asian countries: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chohyunwoo howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT hwangeuihyoung howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT limbyungmook howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT heokwangho howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT liujianping howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT tsutanikiichiro howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT leemyeongsoo howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews AT shinbyungcheul howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews |