Cargando…

How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Hyun-Woo, Hwang, Eui-Hyoung, Lim, Byungmook, Heo, Kwang-Ho, Liu, Jian-Ping, Tsutani, Kiichiro, Lee, Myeong Soo, Shin, Byung-Cheul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027
_version_ 1782302481573740544
author Cho, Hyun-Woo
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Lim, Byungmook
Heo, Kwang-Ho
Liu, Jian-Ping
Tsutani, Kiichiro
Lee, Myeong Soo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_facet Cho, Hyun-Woo
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Lim, Byungmook
Heo, Kwang-Ho
Liu, Jian-Ping
Tsutani, Kiichiro
Lee, Myeong Soo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_sort Cho, Hyun-Woo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyze the impact of this gap on present CPGs. METHODS: We examined 5 representative TM interventions in the health care systems of East-Asian countries. We searched seven relevant databases for CPGs to identify whether core CPGs included evidence of TM interventions, and we searched 11 databases for SR-MAs to re-evaluate current evidence on TM interventions. We then compared the gap between the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs and 22 SR-MAs met our inclusion criteria. Of the 13 CPGs, 7 CPGs (54%) mentioned TM interventions, and all were for acupuncture (only one was for both acupuncture and acupressure). However, the CPGs did not recommend acupuncture (or acupressure). Of 22 SR-MAs, 16 were for acupuncture, 5 for manual therapy, 1 for cupping, and none for moxibustion and herbal medicine. Comparing the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs, an underestimation or omission of evidence for acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy in current CPGs was detected. Thus, applying the results from the SR-MAs, we moderately recommend acupuncture for chronic LBP, but we inconclusively recommend acupuncture for (sub)acute LBP due to the limited current evidence. Furthermore, we weakly recommend cupping and manual therapy for both (sub)acute and chronic LBP. We cannot provide recommendations for moxibustion and herbal medicine due to a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPGs did not fully reflect the evidence for TM interventions. As relevant studies such as SR-MAs are conducted and evidence increases, the current evidence on acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy should be rigorously considered in the process of developing or updating the CPG system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3914865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39148652014-02-06 How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews Cho, Hyun-Woo Hwang, Eui-Hyoung Lim, Byungmook Heo, Kwang-Ho Liu, Jian-Ping Tsutani, Kiichiro Lee, Myeong Soo Shin, Byung-Cheul PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate whether there is a gap between evidence of traditional medicine (TM) interventions in East-Asian countries from the current Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and evidence from current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR-MAs) and to analyze the impact of this gap on present CPGs. METHODS: We examined 5 representative TM interventions in the health care systems of East-Asian countries. We searched seven relevant databases for CPGs to identify whether core CPGs included evidence of TM interventions, and we searched 11 databases for SR-MAs to re-evaluate current evidence on TM interventions. We then compared the gap between the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs. RESULTS: Thirteen CPGs and 22 SR-MAs met our inclusion criteria. Of the 13 CPGs, 7 CPGs (54%) mentioned TM interventions, and all were for acupuncture (only one was for both acupuncture and acupressure). However, the CPGs did not recommend acupuncture (or acupressure). Of 22 SR-MAs, 16 were for acupuncture, 5 for manual therapy, 1 for cupping, and none for moxibustion and herbal medicine. Comparing the evidence from CPGs and SR-MAs, an underestimation or omission of evidence for acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy in current CPGs was detected. Thus, applying the results from the SR-MAs, we moderately recommend acupuncture for chronic LBP, but we inconclusively recommend acupuncture for (sub)acute LBP due to the limited current evidence. Furthermore, we weakly recommend cupping and manual therapy for both (sub)acute and chronic LBP. We cannot provide recommendations for moxibustion and herbal medicine due to a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The current CPGs did not fully reflect the evidence for TM interventions. As relevant studies such as SR-MAs are conducted and evidence increases, the current evidence on acupuncture, cupping, and manual therapy should be rigorously considered in the process of developing or updating the CPG system. Public Library of Science 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3914865/ /pubmed/24505363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027 Text en © 2014 Cho et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cho, Hyun-Woo
Hwang, Eui-Hyoung
Lim, Byungmook
Heo, Kwang-Ho
Liu, Jian-Ping
Tsutani, Kiichiro
Lee, Myeong Soo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title_full How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title_short How Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain Reflect Traditional Medicine in East Asian Countries: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Systematic Reviews
title_sort how current clinical practice guidelines for low back pain reflect traditional medicine in east asian countries: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24505363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088027
work_keys_str_mv AT chohyunwoo howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT hwangeuihyoung howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT limbyungmook howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT heokwangho howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT liujianping howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT tsutanikiichiro howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT leemyeongsoo howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews
AT shinbyungcheul howcurrentclinicalpracticeguidelinesforlowbackpainreflecttraditionalmedicineineastasiancountriesasystematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesandsystematicreviews