Cargando…

Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review

Background: Globally, 2.8 billion people rely on household solid fuels. Reducing the resulting adverse health, environmental, and development consequences will involve transitioning through a mix of clean fuels and improved solid fuel stoves (IS) of demonstrable effectiveness. To date, achieving upt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehfuess, Eva A., Puzzolo, Elisa, Stanistreet, Debbi, Pope, Daniel, Bruce, Nigel G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639
_version_ 1782302482041405440
author Rehfuess, Eva A.
Puzzolo, Elisa
Stanistreet, Debbi
Pope, Daniel
Bruce, Nigel G.
author_facet Rehfuess, Eva A.
Puzzolo, Elisa
Stanistreet, Debbi
Pope, Daniel
Bruce, Nigel G.
author_sort Rehfuess, Eva A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Globally, 2.8 billion people rely on household solid fuels. Reducing the resulting adverse health, environmental, and development consequences will involve transitioning through a mix of clean fuels and improved solid fuel stoves (IS) of demonstrable effectiveness. To date, achieving uptake of IS has presented significant challenges. Objectives: We performed a systematic review of factors that enable or limit large-scale uptake of IS in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We conducted systematic searches through multidisciplinary databases, specialist websites, and consulting experts. The review drew on qualitative, quantitative, and case studies and used standardized methods for screening, data extraction, critical appraisal, and synthesis. We summarized our findings as “factors” relating to one of seven domains—fuel and technology characteristics; household and setting characteristics; knowledge and perceptions; finance, tax, and subsidy aspects; market development; regulation, legislation, and standards; programmatic and policy mechanisms—and also recorded issues that impacted equity. Results: We identified 31 factors influencing uptake from 57 studies conducted in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. All domains matter. Although factors such as offering technologies that meet household needs and save fuel, user training and support, effective financing, and facilitative government action appear to be critical, none guarantee success: All factors can be influential, depending on context. The nature of available evidence did not permit further prioritization. Conclusions: Achieving adoption and sustained use of IS at a large scale requires that all factors, spanning household/community and program/societal levels, be assessed and supported by policy. We propose a planning tool that would aid this process and suggest further research to incorporate an evaluation of effectiveness. Citation: Rehfuess EA, Puzzolo E, Stanistreet D, Pope D, Bruce NG. 2014. Enablers and barriers to large-scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect 122:120–130; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3914867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39148672014-02-13 Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review Rehfuess, Eva A. Puzzolo, Elisa Stanistreet, Debbi Pope, Daniel Bruce, Nigel G. Environ Health Perspect Review Background: Globally, 2.8 billion people rely on household solid fuels. Reducing the resulting adverse health, environmental, and development consequences will involve transitioning through a mix of clean fuels and improved solid fuel stoves (IS) of demonstrable effectiveness. To date, achieving uptake of IS has presented significant challenges. Objectives: We performed a systematic review of factors that enable or limit large-scale uptake of IS in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We conducted systematic searches through multidisciplinary databases, specialist websites, and consulting experts. The review drew on qualitative, quantitative, and case studies and used standardized methods for screening, data extraction, critical appraisal, and synthesis. We summarized our findings as “factors” relating to one of seven domains—fuel and technology characteristics; household and setting characteristics; knowledge and perceptions; finance, tax, and subsidy aspects; market development; regulation, legislation, and standards; programmatic and policy mechanisms—and also recorded issues that impacted equity. Results: We identified 31 factors influencing uptake from 57 studies conducted in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. All domains matter. Although factors such as offering technologies that meet household needs and save fuel, user training and support, effective financing, and facilitative government action appear to be critical, none guarantee success: All factors can be influential, depending on context. The nature of available evidence did not permit further prioritization. Conclusions: Achieving adoption and sustained use of IS at a large scale requires that all factors, spanning household/community and program/societal levels, be assessed and supported by policy. We propose a planning tool that would aid this process and suggest further research to incorporate an evaluation of effectiveness. Citation: Rehfuess EA, Puzzolo E, Stanistreet D, Pope D, Bruce NG. 2014. Enablers and barriers to large-scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect 122:120–130; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013-12-03 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3914867/ /pubmed/24300100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Rehfuess, Eva A.
Puzzolo, Elisa
Stanistreet, Debbi
Pope, Daniel
Bruce, Nigel G.
Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title_full Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title_short Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review
title_sort enablers and barriers to large-scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3914867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306639
work_keys_str_mv AT rehfuessevaa enablersandbarrierstolargescaleuptakeofimprovedsolidfuelstovesasystematicreview
AT puzzoloelisa enablersandbarrierstolargescaleuptakeofimprovedsolidfuelstovesasystematicreview
AT stanistreetdebbi enablersandbarrierstolargescaleuptakeofimprovedsolidfuelstovesasystematicreview
AT popedaniel enablersandbarrierstolargescaleuptakeofimprovedsolidfuelstovesasystematicreview
AT brucenigelg enablersandbarrierstolargescaleuptakeofimprovedsolidfuelstovesasystematicreview