Cargando…

Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND: The histology and grade of endometrial cancer are important predictors of disease outcome and of the likelihood of nodal involvement. In most centres, however, surgical staging decisions are based on a preoperative biopsy. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helpman, L, Kupets, R, Covens, A, Saad, R S, Khalifa, M A, Ismiil, N, Ghorab, Z, Dubé, V, Nofech-Mozes, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.766
_version_ 1782302531175579648
author Helpman, L
Kupets, R
Covens, A
Saad, R S
Khalifa, M A
Ismiil, N
Ghorab, Z
Dubé, V
Nofech-Mozes, S
author_facet Helpman, L
Kupets, R
Covens, A
Saad, R S
Khalifa, M A
Ismiil, N
Ghorab, Z
Dubé, V
Nofech-Mozes, S
author_sort Helpman, L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The histology and grade of endometrial cancer are important predictors of disease outcome and of the likelihood of nodal involvement. In most centres, however, surgical staging decisions are based on a preoperative biopsy. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the preoperative histology and that of the hysterectomy specimen in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients treated for endometrial cancer during a 10-year period at a tertiary cancer centre were identified from a prospectively collected pathological database. All pathology reports were reviewed to confirm centralised reporting of the original sampling or biopsy specimens; patients whose biopsies were not reviewed by a dedicated gynaecological pathologist at the treating centre were excluded. Surgical pathology data including histology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal involvement and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as well as preoperative histology and grade were collected. Preoperative and final tumour cell type and grade were compared and the distribution of other high-risk features was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 1329 consecutive patients were identified; 653 patients had a centrally reviewed epithelial endometrial cancer on their original biopsy, and are included in this study. Of 255 patients whose biopsies were read as grade 1 (G1) adenocarcinoma, 45 (18%) were upgraded to grade 2 (G2) on final pathology, 6 (2%) were upgraded to grade 3 (G3) and 5 (2%) were read as a non-endometrioid high-grade histology. Overall, of 255 tumours classified as G1 endometrioid cancers on biopsy, 74 (29%) were either found to be low-grade (G1–2) tumours with deep myometrial invasion, or were reclassified as high-grade cancers (G3 or non-endometrioid histologies) on final surgical pathology. Despite these shifts, we calculate that omitting surgical staging in preoperatively diagnosed G1 endometrioid cancers without deep myometrial invasion would result in missing nodal involvement in only 1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative endometrial sampling is only a modest predictor of surgical pathology features in endometrial cancer and may underestimate the risk of disease spread and recurrence. In spite of frequent shifts in postoperative vs preoperative histological assessment, the predicted rate of missed nodal metastases with a selective staging policy remains low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39151292015-02-04 Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer Helpman, L Kupets, R Covens, A Saad, R S Khalifa, M A Ismiil, N Ghorab, Z Dubé, V Nofech-Mozes, S Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The histology and grade of endometrial cancer are important predictors of disease outcome and of the likelihood of nodal involvement. In most centres, however, surgical staging decisions are based on a preoperative biopsy. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between the preoperative histology and that of the hysterectomy specimen in endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients treated for endometrial cancer during a 10-year period at a tertiary cancer centre were identified from a prospectively collected pathological database. All pathology reports were reviewed to confirm centralised reporting of the original sampling or biopsy specimens; patients whose biopsies were not reviewed by a dedicated gynaecological pathologist at the treating centre were excluded. Surgical pathology data including histology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal involvement and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as well as preoperative histology and grade were collected. Preoperative and final tumour cell type and grade were compared and the distribution of other high-risk features was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 1329 consecutive patients were identified; 653 patients had a centrally reviewed epithelial endometrial cancer on their original biopsy, and are included in this study. Of 255 patients whose biopsies were read as grade 1 (G1) adenocarcinoma, 45 (18%) were upgraded to grade 2 (G2) on final pathology, 6 (2%) were upgraded to grade 3 (G3) and 5 (2%) were read as a non-endometrioid high-grade histology. Overall, of 255 tumours classified as G1 endometrioid cancers on biopsy, 74 (29%) were either found to be low-grade (G1–2) tumours with deep myometrial invasion, or were reclassified as high-grade cancers (G3 or non-endometrioid histologies) on final surgical pathology. Despite these shifts, we calculate that omitting surgical staging in preoperatively diagnosed G1 endometrioid cancers without deep myometrial invasion would result in missing nodal involvement in only 1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative endometrial sampling is only a modest predictor of surgical pathology features in endometrial cancer and may underestimate the risk of disease spread and recurrence. In spite of frequent shifts in postoperative vs preoperative histological assessment, the predicted rate of missed nodal metastases with a selective staging policy remains low. Nature Publishing Group 2014-02-04 2013-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3915129/ /pubmed/24366295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.766 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Helpman, L
Kupets, R
Covens, A
Saad, R S
Khalifa, M A
Ismiil, N
Ghorab, Z
Dubé, V
Nofech-Mozes, S
Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title_full Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title_fullStr Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title_short Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
title_sort assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24366295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.766
work_keys_str_mv AT helpmanl assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT kupetsr assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT covensa assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT saadrs assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT khalifama assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT ismiiln assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT ghorabz assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT dubev assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer
AT nofechmozess assessmentofendometrialsamplingasapredictoroffinalsurgicalpathologyinendometrialcancer