Cargando…

Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico

BACKGROUND: The larvicidal efficacy of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad, for control of immature stages of Anopheles albimanus and associated culicids, was compared to that of synthetic and biological larvicides. Effects on non-target insects were also determined. METHODS: A field trial wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marina, Carlos F, Bond, J Guillermo, Muñoz, José, Valle, Javier, Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo, Williams, Trevor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-55
_version_ 1782302547673874432
author Marina, Carlos F
Bond, J Guillermo
Muñoz, José
Valle, Javier
Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo
Williams, Trevor
author_facet Marina, Carlos F
Bond, J Guillermo
Muñoz, José
Valle, Javier
Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo
Williams, Trevor
author_sort Marina, Carlos F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The larvicidal efficacy of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad, for control of immature stages of Anopheles albimanus and associated culicids, was compared to that of synthetic and biological larvicides. Effects on non-target insects were also determined. METHODS: A field trial was performed in replicated temporary pools during the rainy season, in southern Mexico. Pools were treated with 10 ppm a.i. spinosad (Tracer 480SC), Bti granules applied at 2 kg/ha (VectoBac WDG, ABG-6511), and 100 ml/ha temephos (50 EC), or an untreated control. Numbers of immature mosquitoes, and aquatic insects in pools were monitored for 20 weeks. RESULTS: Samples of immature mosquitoes comprised approximately 10% An. albimanus, 70% Culex spp. (mostly Cx. melanoconion and Cx. coronator) and 20% Uranotaenia lowii. The most effective larvicides were spinosad and temephos that eliminated An. albimanus in 16 out of 20 post-treatment samples, or 9 weeks of continuous control of immature stages, respectively. These larvicides resulted in 15 and 5 weeks of elimination of Culex spp., respectively, or 20 and 4 weeks of continuous elimination of U. lowii, respectively. Bti treatment provided little consistent control. Aquatic insects were recorded comprising 3 orders, 20 families, 40 genera and 44 species. Shannon diversity index values (H’) for aquatic insects were highest in the control (0.997) and Bti (0.974) treatments, intermediate in the spinosad treatment (0.638) and lowest in the temephos treatment (0.520). Severely affected non-target insects in the spinosad and temephos treated pools were predatory Coleoptera, Hemiptera and Odonata, which in the case of spinosad was likely due to the high concentration applied. Bti had little effect on aquatic insects. CONCLUSIONS: The spinosad treatment retained larvicidal activity for markedly longer than expected. Spinosad is likely to be an effective tool for control of anopheline and other pool-breeding mosquitoes in tropical regions. Non-target effects of spinosad on aquatic insects merit further study, but were likely related to the concentration of the product used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39152262014-02-07 Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico Marina, Carlos F Bond, J Guillermo Muñoz, José Valle, Javier Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo Williams, Trevor Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The larvicidal efficacy of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad, for control of immature stages of Anopheles albimanus and associated culicids, was compared to that of synthetic and biological larvicides. Effects on non-target insects were also determined. METHODS: A field trial was performed in replicated temporary pools during the rainy season, in southern Mexico. Pools were treated with 10 ppm a.i. spinosad (Tracer 480SC), Bti granules applied at 2 kg/ha (VectoBac WDG, ABG-6511), and 100 ml/ha temephos (50 EC), or an untreated control. Numbers of immature mosquitoes, and aquatic insects in pools were monitored for 20 weeks. RESULTS: Samples of immature mosquitoes comprised approximately 10% An. albimanus, 70% Culex spp. (mostly Cx. melanoconion and Cx. coronator) and 20% Uranotaenia lowii. The most effective larvicides were spinosad and temephos that eliminated An. albimanus in 16 out of 20 post-treatment samples, or 9 weeks of continuous control of immature stages, respectively. These larvicides resulted in 15 and 5 weeks of elimination of Culex spp., respectively, or 20 and 4 weeks of continuous elimination of U. lowii, respectively. Bti treatment provided little consistent control. Aquatic insects were recorded comprising 3 orders, 20 families, 40 genera and 44 species. Shannon diversity index values (H’) for aquatic insects were highest in the control (0.997) and Bti (0.974) treatments, intermediate in the spinosad treatment (0.638) and lowest in the temephos treatment (0.520). Severely affected non-target insects in the spinosad and temephos treated pools were predatory Coleoptera, Hemiptera and Odonata, which in the case of spinosad was likely due to the high concentration applied. Bti had little effect on aquatic insects. CONCLUSIONS: The spinosad treatment retained larvicidal activity for markedly longer than expected. Spinosad is likely to be an effective tool for control of anopheline and other pool-breeding mosquitoes in tropical regions. Non-target effects of spinosad on aquatic insects merit further study, but were likely related to the concentration of the product used. BioMed Central 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3915226/ /pubmed/24479683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-55 Text en Copyright © 2014 Marina et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Marina, Carlos F
Bond, J Guillermo
Muñoz, José
Valle, Javier
Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo
Williams, Trevor
Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title_full Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title_fullStr Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title_short Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico
title_sort efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, bti and temephos larvicides for control of anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern mexico
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-55
work_keys_str_mv AT marinacarlosf efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico
AT bondjguillermo efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico
AT munozjose efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico
AT vallejavier efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico
AT novelogutierrezrodolfo efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico
AT williamstrevor efficacyandnontargetimpactofspinosadbtiandtemephoslarvicidesforcontrolofanophelessppinanendemicmalariaregionofsouthernmexico