Cargando…

Parameters for burst detection

Bursts of action potentials within neurons and throughout networks are believed to serve roles in how neurons handle and store information, both in vivo and in vitro. Accurate detection of burst occurrences and durations are therefore crucial for many studies. A number of algorithms have been propos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakkum, Douglas J., Radivojevic, Milos, Frey, Urs, Franke, Felix, Hierlemann, Andreas, Takahashi, Hirokazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00193
_version_ 1782302550183116800
author Bakkum, Douglas J.
Radivojevic, Milos
Frey, Urs
Franke, Felix
Hierlemann, Andreas
Takahashi, Hirokazu
author_facet Bakkum, Douglas J.
Radivojevic, Milos
Frey, Urs
Franke, Felix
Hierlemann, Andreas
Takahashi, Hirokazu
author_sort Bakkum, Douglas J.
collection PubMed
description Bursts of action potentials within neurons and throughout networks are believed to serve roles in how neurons handle and store information, both in vivo and in vitro. Accurate detection of burst occurrences and durations are therefore crucial for many studies. A number of algorithms have been proposed to do so, but a standard method has not been adopted. This is due, in part, to many algorithms requiring the adjustment of multiple ad-hoc parameters and further post-hoc criteria in order to produce satisfactory results. Here, we broadly catalog existing approaches and present a new approach requiring the selection of only a single parameter: the number of spikes N comprising the smallest burst to consider. A burst was identified if N spikes occurred in less than T ms, where the threshold T was automatically determined from observing a probability distribution of inter-spike-intervals. Performance was compared vs. different classes of detectors on data gathered from in vitro neuronal networks grown over microelectrode arrays. Our approach offered a number of useful features including: a simple implementation, no need for ad-hoc or post-hoc criteria, and precise assignment of burst boundary time points. Unlike existing approaches, detection was not biased toward larger bursts, allowing identification and analysis of a greater range of neuronal and network dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39152372014-02-24 Parameters for burst detection Bakkum, Douglas J. Radivojevic, Milos Frey, Urs Franke, Felix Hierlemann, Andreas Takahashi, Hirokazu Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Bursts of action potentials within neurons and throughout networks are believed to serve roles in how neurons handle and store information, both in vivo and in vitro. Accurate detection of burst occurrences and durations are therefore crucial for many studies. A number of algorithms have been proposed to do so, but a standard method has not been adopted. This is due, in part, to many algorithms requiring the adjustment of multiple ad-hoc parameters and further post-hoc criteria in order to produce satisfactory results. Here, we broadly catalog existing approaches and present a new approach requiring the selection of only a single parameter: the number of spikes N comprising the smallest burst to consider. A burst was identified if N spikes occurred in less than T ms, where the threshold T was automatically determined from observing a probability distribution of inter-spike-intervals. Performance was compared vs. different classes of detectors on data gathered from in vitro neuronal networks grown over microelectrode arrays. Our approach offered a number of useful features including: a simple implementation, no need for ad-hoc or post-hoc criteria, and precise assignment of burst boundary time points. Unlike existing approaches, detection was not biased toward larger bursts, allowing identification and analysis of a greater range of neuronal and network dynamics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3915237/ /pubmed/24567714 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00193 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bakkum, Radivojevic, Frey, Franke, Hierlemann and Takahashi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bakkum, Douglas J.
Radivojevic, Milos
Frey, Urs
Franke, Felix
Hierlemann, Andreas
Takahashi, Hirokazu
Parameters for burst detection
title Parameters for burst detection
title_full Parameters for burst detection
title_fullStr Parameters for burst detection
title_full_unstemmed Parameters for burst detection
title_short Parameters for burst detection
title_sort parameters for burst detection
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567714
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2013.00193
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkumdouglasj parametersforburstdetection
AT radivojevicmilos parametersforburstdetection
AT freyurs parametersforburstdetection
AT frankefelix parametersforburstdetection
AT hierlemannandreas parametersforburstdetection
AT takahashihirokazu parametersforburstdetection