Cargando…
Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
Background: Epidemiologic evidence suggests a negative relation between sunlight exposure and breast cancer risk. The hypothesized mechanism is sunlight-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. Objectives: Our goal was to examine sun exposure and its interaction with vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24252436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206274 |
_version_ | 1782302553790218240 |
---|---|
author | Engel, Lawrence S. Satagopan, Jaya Sima, Camelia S. Orlow, Irene Mujumdar, Urvi Coble, Joseph Roy, Pampa Yoo, Sarah Sandler, Dale P. Alavanja, Michael C. |
author_facet | Engel, Lawrence S. Satagopan, Jaya Sima, Camelia S. Orlow, Irene Mujumdar, Urvi Coble, Joseph Roy, Pampa Yoo, Sarah Sandler, Dale P. Alavanja, Michael C. |
author_sort | Engel, Lawrence S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Epidemiologic evidence suggests a negative relation between sunlight exposure and breast cancer risk. The hypothesized mechanism is sunlight-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. Objectives: Our goal was to examine sun exposure and its interaction with vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene variants on breast cancer risk. Methods: We examined sun exposure and breast cancer incidence among 31,021 private pesticide applicators’ wives, including 578 cases, enrolled in the prospective Agricultural Health Study cohort and followed 8.6 years on average. We estimated interactions between sun exposure, VDR variants, and breast cancer in a nested case–control study comprising 293 cases and 586 matched controls. Information on sun exposure was obtained by questionnaire at cohort enrollment. Relative risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression for the cohort data and conditional logistic regression for the nested case–control data. Results: We observed a small decrease in breast cancer risk in association with usual sun exposure of ≥ 1 hr/day (versus < 1 hr/day) 10 years before the start of follow-up among all participants [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.0]. The association appeared to be slightly stronger in relation to estrogen receptor–positive tumors (HR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9) than estrogen receptor–negative tumors (HR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 2.1). The HR for joint exposure ≥ 1 hr/day of sunlight and one VDR haplotype was less than expected given negative HRs for each individual exposure (interaction p-value = 0.07). Conclusion: Our results suggest that sun exposure may be associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, but we did not find clear evidence of modification by VDR variants. Larger studies are warranted, particularly among populations in whom low levels of usual sun exposure can be more precisely characterized. Citation: Engel LS, Satagopan J, Sima CS, Orlow I, Mujumdar U, Coble J, Roy P, Yoo S, Sandler DP, Alavanja MC. 2014. Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor genetic variants, and risk of breast cancer in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 122:165–171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206274 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3915256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39152562014-02-13 Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study Engel, Lawrence S. Satagopan, Jaya Sima, Camelia S. Orlow, Irene Mujumdar, Urvi Coble, Joseph Roy, Pampa Yoo, Sarah Sandler, Dale P. Alavanja, Michael C. Environ Health Perspect Research Background: Epidemiologic evidence suggests a negative relation between sunlight exposure and breast cancer risk. The hypothesized mechanism is sunlight-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D. Objectives: Our goal was to examine sun exposure and its interaction with vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene variants on breast cancer risk. Methods: We examined sun exposure and breast cancer incidence among 31,021 private pesticide applicators’ wives, including 578 cases, enrolled in the prospective Agricultural Health Study cohort and followed 8.6 years on average. We estimated interactions between sun exposure, VDR variants, and breast cancer in a nested case–control study comprising 293 cases and 586 matched controls. Information on sun exposure was obtained by questionnaire at cohort enrollment. Relative risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression for the cohort data and conditional logistic regression for the nested case–control data. Results: We observed a small decrease in breast cancer risk in association with usual sun exposure of ≥ 1 hr/day (versus < 1 hr/day) 10 years before the start of follow-up among all participants [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.0]. The association appeared to be slightly stronger in relation to estrogen receptor–positive tumors (HR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9) than estrogen receptor–negative tumors (HR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 2.1). The HR for joint exposure ≥ 1 hr/day of sunlight and one VDR haplotype was less than expected given negative HRs for each individual exposure (interaction p-value = 0.07). Conclusion: Our results suggest that sun exposure may be associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, but we did not find clear evidence of modification by VDR variants. Larger studies are warranted, particularly among populations in whom low levels of usual sun exposure can be more precisely characterized. Citation: Engel LS, Satagopan J, Sima CS, Orlow I, Mujumdar U, Coble J, Roy P, Yoo S, Sandler DP, Alavanja MC. 2014. Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor genetic variants, and risk of breast cancer in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect 122:165–171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206274 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2013-11-19 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3915256/ /pubmed/24252436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206274 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Engel, Lawrence S. Satagopan, Jaya Sima, Camelia S. Orlow, Irene Mujumdar, Urvi Coble, Joseph Roy, Pampa Yoo, Sarah Sandler, Dale P. Alavanja, Michael C. Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title | Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title_full | Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title_fullStr | Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title_short | Sun Exposure, Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Variants, and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study |
title_sort | sun exposure, vitamin d receptor genetic variants, and risk of breast cancer in the agricultural health study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24252436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engellawrences sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT satagopanjaya sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT simacamelias sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT orlowirene sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT mujumdarurvi sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT coblejoseph sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT roypampa sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT yoosarah sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT sandlerdalep sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy AT alavanjamichaelc sunexposurevitamindreceptorgeneticvariantsandriskofbreastcancerintheagriculturalhealthstudy |