Cargando…
Are institutional review boards prepared for active continuing review?
Continuing review is an important responsibility of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Though being mentioned by many of the national and international guidelines, it is carried out routinely only in UK. The reasons may be inadequate training, overworked IRBs, less enthusiasm among the IRB members,...
Autores principales: | Shetty, Yashashri C., Jadhav, Kshitij S., Saiyed, Aafreen A., Desai, Akshay U. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551581 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.124553 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Institutional review boards: Challenges and opportunities
por: Ghooi, Ravindra B.
Publicado: (2014) -
When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
2543: Participatory development of a CTSA-wide Community Advisory Board: Enhancing community engagement at the Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research
por: Delva, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
How do community advisory boards fulfil their ethical role in HIV clinical trials? A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence
por: Pancras, Godwin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cross-sectional analysis of pharmaceutical payments to Japanese board-certified gastroenterologists between 2016 and 2019
por: Murayama, Anju, et al.
Publicado: (2023)