Cargando…

Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems

BACKGROUND: The radiopacity of contemporary adhesive systems has been mentioned as the indication for replacement of restorations due to misinterpretation of radiographic images. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the radiopacity of contemporary bonding agents and to compare their radiodensities wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino, Honório, Naira Cândido, Amorim, Dayse Annie Nicácio, de Melo Franco, Áurea Valéria, Penteado, Luiz Alexandre Moura, Parolia, Abhishek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24554865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.124151
_version_ 1782302576266444800
author de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino
Honório, Naira Cândido
Amorim, Dayse Annie Nicácio
de Melo Franco, Áurea Valéria
Penteado, Luiz Alexandre Moura
Parolia, Abhishek
author_facet de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino
Honório, Naira Cândido
Amorim, Dayse Annie Nicácio
de Melo Franco, Áurea Valéria
Penteado, Luiz Alexandre Moura
Parolia, Abhishek
author_sort de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The radiopacity of contemporary adhesive systems has been mentioned as the indication for replacement of restorations due to misinterpretation of radiographic images. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the radiopacity of contemporary bonding agents and to compare their radiodensities with those of enamel and dentin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To measure the radiopacity, eight specimens were fabricated from Clearfil SE Bond (CF), Xeno V (XE), Adper SE Bond (ASE), Magic Bond (MB), Single Bond 2 (SB), Scotchbond Multipurpose (SM), and gutta-percha (positive control). The optical densities of enamel, dentin, the bonding agents, gutta-percha, and an aluminium (Al) step wedge were obtained from radiographic images using image analysis software. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The radiographic density data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α =0.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between ASE and all other groups tested and between XE and CF. No statistical difference was observed between the radiodensity of 1 mm of Al and 1 mm of dentin, between 2 mm of Al and enamel, and between 5 mm of Al and gutta-percha. Five of the six adhesive resins had radiopacity values that fell below the value for dentin, whereas the radiopacity of ASE adhesive was greater than that of dentin but below that of enamel. CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrates that only ASE presented a radiopacity within the values of dentin and enamel. CF, XE, MB, SB, and SM adhesives are all radiolucent and require alterations to their composition to facilitate their detection by means of radiographic images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39153902014-02-19 Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino Honório, Naira Cândido Amorim, Dayse Annie Nicácio de Melo Franco, Áurea Valéria Penteado, Luiz Alexandre Moura Parolia, Abhishek J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The radiopacity of contemporary adhesive systems has been mentioned as the indication for replacement of restorations due to misinterpretation of radiographic images. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the radiopacity of contemporary bonding agents and to compare their radiodensities with those of enamel and dentin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To measure the radiopacity, eight specimens were fabricated from Clearfil SE Bond (CF), Xeno V (XE), Adper SE Bond (ASE), Magic Bond (MB), Single Bond 2 (SB), Scotchbond Multipurpose (SM), and gutta-percha (positive control). The optical densities of enamel, dentin, the bonding agents, gutta-percha, and an aluminium (Al) step wedge were obtained from radiographic images using image analysis software. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The radiographic density data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α =0.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between ASE and all other groups tested and between XE and CF. No statistical difference was observed between the radiodensity of 1 mm of Al and 1 mm of dentin, between 2 mm of Al and enamel, and between 5 mm of Al and gutta-percha. Five of the six adhesive resins had radiopacity values that fell below the value for dentin, whereas the radiopacity of ASE adhesive was greater than that of dentin but below that of enamel. CONCLUSION: This investigation demonstrates that only ASE presented a radiopacity within the values of dentin and enamel. CF, XE, MB, SB, and SM adhesives are all radiolucent and require alterations to their composition to facilitate their detection by means of radiographic images. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3915390/ /pubmed/24554865 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.124151 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina Celerino
Honório, Naira Cândido
Amorim, Dayse Annie Nicácio
de Melo Franco, Áurea Valéria
Penteado, Luiz Alexandre Moura
Parolia, Abhishek
Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title_full Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title_fullStr Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title_short Comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
title_sort comparative radiopacity of six current adhesive systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24554865
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.124151
work_keys_str_mv AT demoraesportoisabelcristinacelerino comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems
AT honorionairacandido comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems
AT amorimdayseannienicacio comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems
AT demelofrancoaureavaleria comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems
AT penteadoluizalexandremoura comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems
AT paroliaabhishek comparativeradiopacityofsixcurrentadhesivesystems