Cargando…
A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-beh...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038 |
_version_ | 1782302578977013760 |
---|---|
author | Schubert, Emery Hargreaves, David J. North, Adrian C. |
author_facet | Schubert, Emery Hargreaves, David J. North, Adrian C. |
author_sort | Schubert, Emery |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3915416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39154162014-02-24 A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? Schubert, Emery Hargreaves, David J. North, Adrian C. Front Psychol Psychology This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3915416/ /pubmed/24567723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schubert, Hargreaves and North. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Schubert, Emery Hargreaves, David J. North, Adrian C. A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title | A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title_full | A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title_fullStr | A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title_full_unstemmed | A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title_short | A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
title_sort | dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schubertemery adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything AT hargreavesdavidj adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything AT northadrianc adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything AT schubertemery dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything AT hargreavesdavidj dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything AT northadrianc dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything |