Cargando…

A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?

This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schubert, Emery, Hargreaves, David J., North, Adrian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038
_version_ 1782302578977013760
author Schubert, Emery
Hargreaves, David J.
North, Adrian C.
author_facet Schubert, Emery
Hargreaves, David J.
North, Adrian C.
author_sort Schubert, Emery
collection PubMed
description This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39154162014-02-24 A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? Schubert, Emery Hargreaves, David J. North, Adrian C. Front Psychol Psychology This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3915416/ /pubmed/24567723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schubert, Hargreaves and North. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Schubert, Emery
Hargreaves, David J.
North, Adrian C.
A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_full A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_fullStr A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_full_unstemmed A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_short A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_sort dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24567723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038
work_keys_str_mv AT schubertemery adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything
AT hargreavesdavidj adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything
AT northadrianc adynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything
AT schubertemery dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything
AT hargreavesdavidj dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything
AT northadrianc dynamicallyminimalistcognitiveexplanationofmusicalpreferenceisfamiliarityeverything