Cargando…

Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is a common malignancy and cause of mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) detection in preoperative clinical T/N staging in gastric cancer. Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with gastric cancer b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEI, CUI, HUANG, LIMING, WANG, YANLIN, HUANG, YILING, HUANG, YURONG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.103
_version_ 1782302613550661632
author LEI, CUI
HUANG, LIMING
WANG, YANLIN
HUANG, YILING
HUANG, YURONG
author_facet LEI, CUI
HUANG, LIMING
WANG, YANLIN
HUANG, YILING
HUANG, YURONG
author_sort LEI, CUI
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer is a common malignancy and cause of mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) detection in preoperative clinical T/N staging in gastric cancer. Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with gastric cancer by gastroscopy and pathological examination were included in the study. All 38 patients underwent MRI and EUS detection prior to surgery. The accuracy of MRI, EUS and MRI+EUS was evaluated according to postoperative pathological staging. Results identified the accuracy of EUS, MRI and EUS+MRI in T clinical staging to be 86.64, 73.68 and 89.47%, respectively (MRI vs. EUS+MRI, P=0.035), while the accuracy for N clinical staging was 65.78, 68.42 and 71.05%, respectively (P>0.05). The accuracy rate in EUS and EUS+MRI detection in N0 stage was markedly higher compared with that in MRI (100 vs. 86.67%, P=0.032), whereas the rate in EUS detection in N2 stage was lower compared with that in MRI and EUS+MRI (45.45 vs. 54.54%, P=0.021). Thus, both MRI and EUS had a higher accuracy in preoperative T/N staging. Additionally, the accuracy rate was improved significantly when the two procedures were combined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3915684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39156842014-03-19 Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer LEI, CUI HUANG, LIMING WANG, YANLIN HUANG, YILING HUANG, YURONG Mol Clin Oncol Articles Gastric cancer is a common malignancy and cause of mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) detection in preoperative clinical T/N staging in gastric cancer. Thirty-eight patients diagnosed with gastric cancer by gastroscopy and pathological examination were included in the study. All 38 patients underwent MRI and EUS detection prior to surgery. The accuracy of MRI, EUS and MRI+EUS was evaluated according to postoperative pathological staging. Results identified the accuracy of EUS, MRI and EUS+MRI in T clinical staging to be 86.64, 73.68 and 89.47%, respectively (MRI vs. EUS+MRI, P=0.035), while the accuracy for N clinical staging was 65.78, 68.42 and 71.05%, respectively (P>0.05). The accuracy rate in EUS and EUS+MRI detection in N0 stage was markedly higher compared with that in MRI (100 vs. 86.67%, P=0.032), whereas the rate in EUS detection in N2 stage was lower compared with that in MRI and EUS+MRI (45.45 vs. 54.54%, P=0.021). Thus, both MRI and EUS had a higher accuracy in preoperative T/N staging. Additionally, the accuracy rate was improved significantly when the two procedures were combined. D.A. Spandidos 2013-07 2013-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3915684/ /pubmed/24649231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.103 Text en Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
LEI, CUI
HUANG, LIMING
WANG, YANLIN
HUANG, YILING
HUANG, YURONG
Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title_short Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer
title_sort comparison of mri and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative t/n staging of gastric cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3915684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649231
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.103
work_keys_str_mv AT leicui comparisonofmriandendoscopeultrasounddetectioninpreoperativetnstagingofgastriccancer
AT huangliming comparisonofmriandendoscopeultrasounddetectioninpreoperativetnstagingofgastriccancer
AT wangyanlin comparisonofmriandendoscopeultrasounddetectioninpreoperativetnstagingofgastriccancer
AT huangyiling comparisonofmriandendoscopeultrasounddetectioninpreoperativetnstagingofgastriccancer
AT huangyurong comparisonofmriandendoscopeultrasounddetectioninpreoperativetnstagingofgastriccancer