Cargando…

Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts

BACKGROUND: There is continued reliance on conventional veterinary drugs including anthelmintics, to some of which resistance has developed. Loss of indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) from societies affects the opportunities for utilization of ethnopharmacological practices unless properly documen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nabukenya, Immaculate, Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris, Olila, Deogracious, Ikwap, Kokas, Höglund, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-9
_version_ 1782302661184323584
author Nabukenya, Immaculate
Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris
Olila, Deogracious
Ikwap, Kokas
Höglund, Johan
author_facet Nabukenya, Immaculate
Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris
Olila, Deogracious
Ikwap, Kokas
Höglund, Johan
author_sort Nabukenya, Immaculate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is continued reliance on conventional veterinary drugs including anthelmintics, to some of which resistance has developed. Loss of indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) from societies affects the opportunities for utilization of ethnopharmacological practices unless properly documented. This study was conducted to identify common traditional practices using medicinal plants against helminthosis and other livestock diseases in Mpigi and Gulu districts of Uganda. METHODS: Seven focus group discussions with ten farmers per group plus 18 key informant interviews were held in each district from August to November 2011. Ranking was used to quantify disease burdens and to identify priority livestock and breeds. Samples of each plant were submitted to Makerere University herbarium for identification and documentation. The local name, relative availability and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) status were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy six farmers in Mpigi and 74 in Gulu were interviewed. Theileriosis and helminthosis were the most common disease conditions in cattle and goats, respectively. Forty plant species within 34 genera from 22 botanical families were identified, with 20 of these used against helminthosis. Other plants treated wounds and ecto-parasites, theileriosis, retained placenta and bovine ephemeral fever. Non-plant practices (7) and plants cited were used in combination depending on availability. Males older than 40 years had most ethnopharmacological knowledge. Most plants (75%, n = 40) were common, but 10 were rare. IUCN status was not evaluated for 95% of these plants. Conventional and traditional drug use in Gulu and Mpigi districts was different (χ(2) = 24; p < 0.001). The scientific, English, Luganda and Acholi names of all plants and their availability within the communities are documented herein. CONCLUSION: This is the first detailed livestock-related ethnopharmacological study in Gulu district. Farmers in Uganda are still using a variety of practices to treat livestock ailments. Scientific validation and evaluation of conservation status are urgently needed to ensure future availability and knowledge about these plant resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3916071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39160712014-02-07 Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts Nabukenya, Immaculate Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris Olila, Deogracious Ikwap, Kokas Höglund, Johan J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Research BACKGROUND: There is continued reliance on conventional veterinary drugs including anthelmintics, to some of which resistance has developed. Loss of indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) from societies affects the opportunities for utilization of ethnopharmacological practices unless properly documented. This study was conducted to identify common traditional practices using medicinal plants against helminthosis and other livestock diseases in Mpigi and Gulu districts of Uganda. METHODS: Seven focus group discussions with ten farmers per group plus 18 key informant interviews were held in each district from August to November 2011. Ranking was used to quantify disease burdens and to identify priority livestock and breeds. Samples of each plant were submitted to Makerere University herbarium for identification and documentation. The local name, relative availability and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) status were recorded. RESULTS: Seventy six farmers in Mpigi and 74 in Gulu were interviewed. Theileriosis and helminthosis were the most common disease conditions in cattle and goats, respectively. Forty plant species within 34 genera from 22 botanical families were identified, with 20 of these used against helminthosis. Other plants treated wounds and ecto-parasites, theileriosis, retained placenta and bovine ephemeral fever. Non-plant practices (7) and plants cited were used in combination depending on availability. Males older than 40 years had most ethnopharmacological knowledge. Most plants (75%, n = 40) were common, but 10 were rare. IUCN status was not evaluated for 95% of these plants. Conventional and traditional drug use in Gulu and Mpigi districts was different (χ(2) = 24; p < 0.001). The scientific, English, Luganda and Acholi names of all plants and their availability within the communities are documented herein. CONCLUSION: This is the first detailed livestock-related ethnopharmacological study in Gulu district. Farmers in Uganda are still using a variety of practices to treat livestock ailments. Scientific validation and evaluation of conservation status are urgently needed to ensure future availability and knowledge about these plant resources. BioMed Central 2014-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3916071/ /pubmed/24467812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nabukenya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nabukenya, Immaculate
Rubaire-Akiiki, Chris
Olila, Deogracious
Ikwap, Kokas
Höglund, Johan
Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title_full Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title_fullStr Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title_full_unstemmed Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title_short Ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in Uganda: Survey experiences from Mpigi and Gulu districts
title_sort ethnopharmacological practices by livestock farmers in uganda: survey experiences from mpigi and gulu districts
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nabukenyaimmaculate ethnopharmacologicalpracticesbylivestockfarmersinugandasurveyexperiencesfrommpigiandguludistricts
AT rubaireakiikichris ethnopharmacologicalpracticesbylivestockfarmersinugandasurveyexperiencesfrommpigiandguludistricts
AT oliladeogracious ethnopharmacologicalpracticesbylivestockfarmersinugandasurveyexperiencesfrommpigiandguludistricts
AT ikwapkokas ethnopharmacologicalpracticesbylivestockfarmersinugandasurveyexperiencesfrommpigiandguludistricts
AT hoglundjohan ethnopharmacologicalpracticesbylivestockfarmersinugandasurveyexperiencesfrommpigiandguludistricts