Cargando…

Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance

The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for adenocarcinoma (AC) is controversial, although patients with AC of the uterine cervix are treated in a similar manner to those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant RT for patients with AC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SHIMADA, MUNEAKI, NISHIMURA, RYUICHIRO, NOGAWA, TAKAMITSU, HATAE, MASAYUKI, TAKEHARA, KAZUHIRO, YAMADA, HIDEKAZU, KURACHI, HIROHISA, YOKOYAMA, YOSHIHITO, SUGIYAMA, TORU, KIGAWA, JUNZO
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.112
_version_ 1782302677041938432
author SHIMADA, MUNEAKI
NISHIMURA, RYUICHIRO
NOGAWA, TAKAMITSU
HATAE, MASAYUKI
TAKEHARA, KAZUHIRO
YAMADA, HIDEKAZU
KURACHI, HIROHISA
YOKOYAMA, YOSHIHITO
SUGIYAMA, TORU
KIGAWA, JUNZO
author_facet SHIMADA, MUNEAKI
NISHIMURA, RYUICHIRO
NOGAWA, TAKAMITSU
HATAE, MASAYUKI
TAKEHARA, KAZUHIRO
YAMADA, HIDEKAZU
KURACHI, HIROHISA
YOKOYAMA, YOSHIHITO
SUGIYAMA, TORU
KIGAWA, JUNZO
author_sort SHIMADA, MUNEAKI
collection PubMed
description The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for adenocarcinoma (AC) is controversial, although patients with AC of the uterine cervix are treated in a similar manner to those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant RT for patients with AC compared to those with SCC following radical hysterectomy. A total of 820 patients with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer, who underwent type III radical hysterectomy between 1997 and 2003, were retrospectively examined; the sample included 280 patients with AC and 540 with SCC. A total of 139 patients with AC and 327 with SCC underwent adjuvant treatment. The histological type did not affect the outcome for patients with stage I disease; however, stage II patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared to those with SCC. Patients with SCC exhibited significantly higher lymph node involvement compared to those with AC in stage IB1; however, there were no differences between stages IB2 and II. Among patients with lymph node involvement, patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year survival rate compared to those with SCC (46.4 vs. 72.3%, respectively; P=0.0005). Among patients receiving adjuvant RT, those with AC recurred more frequently compared to those with SCC, particularly in the pelvic cavity, including the vaginal stump and/or pelvis (24.6 vs. 10.5%, respectively; P= 0.0022). By contrast, the histological type did not affect the incidence of recurrence in paraaortic lymph nodes and/or distant recurrence. In conclusion, RT may not suffice as an adjuvant treatment for patients with cervical AC following radical hysterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3916196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39161962014-03-19 Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance SHIMADA, MUNEAKI NISHIMURA, RYUICHIRO NOGAWA, TAKAMITSU HATAE, MASAYUKI TAKEHARA, KAZUHIRO YAMADA, HIDEKAZU KURACHI, HIROHISA YOKOYAMA, YOSHIHITO SUGIYAMA, TORU KIGAWA, JUNZO Mol Clin Oncol Articles The efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for adenocarcinoma (AC) is controversial, although patients with AC of the uterine cervix are treated in a similar manner to those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant RT for patients with AC compared to those with SCC following radical hysterectomy. A total of 820 patients with stage IB-IIB cervical cancer, who underwent type III radical hysterectomy between 1997 and 2003, were retrospectively examined; the sample included 280 patients with AC and 540 with SCC. A total of 139 patients with AC and 327 with SCC underwent adjuvant treatment. The histological type did not affect the outcome for patients with stage I disease; however, stage II patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared to those with SCC. Patients with SCC exhibited significantly higher lymph node involvement compared to those with AC in stage IB1; however, there were no differences between stages IB2 and II. Among patients with lymph node involvement, patients with AC exhibited a significantly worse 5-year survival rate compared to those with SCC (46.4 vs. 72.3%, respectively; P=0.0005). Among patients receiving adjuvant RT, those with AC recurred more frequently compared to those with SCC, particularly in the pelvic cavity, including the vaginal stump and/or pelvis (24.6 vs. 10.5%, respectively; P= 0.0022). By contrast, the histological type did not affect the incidence of recurrence in paraaortic lymph nodes and/or distant recurrence. In conclusion, RT may not suffice as an adjuvant treatment for patients with cervical AC following radical hysterectomy. D.A. Spandidos 2013-07 2013-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3916196/ /pubmed/24649246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.112 Text en Copyright © 2013, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
SHIMADA, MUNEAKI
NISHIMURA, RYUICHIRO
NOGAWA, TAKAMITSU
HATAE, MASAYUKI
TAKEHARA, KAZUHIRO
YAMADA, HIDEKAZU
KURACHI, HIROHISA
YOKOYAMA, YOSHIHITO
SUGIYAMA, TORU
KIGAWA, JUNZO
Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title_full Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title_fullStr Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title_short Comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: SGSG/TGCU Intergroup Surveillance
title_sort comparison of the outcome between cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery: sgsg/tgcu intergroup surveillance
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24649246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.112
work_keys_str_mv AT shimadamuneaki comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT nishimuraryuichiro comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT nogawatakamitsu comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT hataemasayuki comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT takeharakazuhiro comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT yamadahidekazu comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT kurachihirohisa comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT yokoyamayoshihito comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT sugiyamatoru comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance
AT kigawajunzo comparisonoftheoutcomebetweencervicaladenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomapatientswithadjuvantradiotherapyfollowingradicalsurgerysgsgtgcuintergroupsurveillance