Cargando…
Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24516646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394 |
_version_ | 1782302717262168064 |
---|---|
author | Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén Lizaso, María T. Goikoetxea, María J. García, Blanca E. Cabrera-Freitag, Paula Trellez, Oswaldo Sanz, María L. |
author_facet | Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén Lizaso, María T. Goikoetxea, María J. García, Blanca E. Cabrera-Freitag, Paula Trellez, Oswaldo Sanz, María L. |
author_sort | Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples were studied, nineteen sera from polysensitized allergic patients, and the technique calibrator provided by the manufacturer (CTR02). We measured the sIgE from CTR02 and three patients' sera ten times in the same and in different assays. Furthermore, all samples were tested in two laboratories and with two batches of ISAC kit. To evaluate the accuracy of ISAC 112, we contrasted the determinations of CTR02 calibrator with their expected values by T Student test. To analyse the precision, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, and to analyse the repeatability and the reproducibility, we calculated the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) to each allergen. RESULTS: The results obtained for CTR02 were similar to those expected in 7 of 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, whereas in 8 allergens the results showed significant differences. The mean CV obtained in the CTR02 determinations was of 9.4%, and the variability of sera from patients was of 22.9%. The agreement in the intra- and inter-assay analysis was very good to 94 allergens and good to one. In the inter-batch analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 82 allergens, good to 14, moderate to 5 allergens, poor to one, and bad to 1 allergen. In the inter-laboratory analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 73 allergens, good to 22, moderate to 6 and poor to two allergens. CONCLUSION: The allergen microarray immunoassay, ISAC 112, is a repeatable and reproducible in vitro diagnostic tool for determination of sIgE beyond the own laboratory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3916438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39164382014-02-10 Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén Lizaso, María T. Goikoetxea, María J. García, Blanca E. Cabrera-Freitag, Paula Trellez, Oswaldo Sanz, María L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples were studied, nineteen sera from polysensitized allergic patients, and the technique calibrator provided by the manufacturer (CTR02). We measured the sIgE from CTR02 and three patients' sera ten times in the same and in different assays. Furthermore, all samples were tested in two laboratories and with two batches of ISAC kit. To evaluate the accuracy of ISAC 112, we contrasted the determinations of CTR02 calibrator with their expected values by T Student test. To analyse the precision, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, and to analyse the repeatability and the reproducibility, we calculated the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) to each allergen. RESULTS: The results obtained for CTR02 were similar to those expected in 7 of 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, whereas in 8 allergens the results showed significant differences. The mean CV obtained in the CTR02 determinations was of 9.4%, and the variability of sera from patients was of 22.9%. The agreement in the intra- and inter-assay analysis was very good to 94 allergens and good to one. In the inter-batch analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 82 allergens, good to 14, moderate to 5 allergens, poor to one, and bad to 1 allergen. In the inter-laboratory analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 73 allergens, good to 22, moderate to 6 and poor to two allergens. CONCLUSION: The allergen microarray immunoassay, ISAC 112, is a repeatable and reproducible in vitro diagnostic tool for determination of sIgE beyond the own laboratory. Public Library of Science 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3916438/ /pubmed/24516646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394 Text en © 2014 Martínez-Aranguren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén Lizaso, María T. Goikoetxea, María J. García, Blanca E. Cabrera-Freitag, Paula Trellez, Oswaldo Sanz, María L. Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title | Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title_full | Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title_fullStr | Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title_short | Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? |
title_sort | is the determination of specific ige against components using isac 112 a reproducible technique? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24516646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinezarangurenruben isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT lizasomariat isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT goikoetxeamariaj isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT garciablancae isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT cabrerafreitagpaula isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT trellezoswaldo isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique AT sanzmarial isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique |