Cargando…

Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?

BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén, Lizaso, María T., Goikoetxea, María J., García, Blanca E., Cabrera-Freitag, Paula, Trellez, Oswaldo, Sanz, María L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24516646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394
_version_ 1782302717262168064
author Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén
Lizaso, María T.
Goikoetxea, María J.
García, Blanca E.
Cabrera-Freitag, Paula
Trellez, Oswaldo
Sanz, María L.
author_facet Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén
Lizaso, María T.
Goikoetxea, María J.
García, Blanca E.
Cabrera-Freitag, Paula
Trellez, Oswaldo
Sanz, María L.
author_sort Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples were studied, nineteen sera from polysensitized allergic patients, and the technique calibrator provided by the manufacturer (CTR02). We measured the sIgE from CTR02 and three patients' sera ten times in the same and in different assays. Furthermore, all samples were tested in two laboratories and with two batches of ISAC kit. To evaluate the accuracy of ISAC 112, we contrasted the determinations of CTR02 calibrator with their expected values by T Student test. To analyse the precision, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, and to analyse the repeatability and the reproducibility, we calculated the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) to each allergen. RESULTS: The results obtained for CTR02 were similar to those expected in 7 of 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, whereas in 8 allergens the results showed significant differences. The mean CV obtained in the CTR02 determinations was of 9.4%, and the variability of sera from patients was of 22.9%. The agreement in the intra- and inter-assay analysis was very good to 94 allergens and good to one. In the inter-batch analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 82 allergens, good to 14, moderate to 5 allergens, poor to one, and bad to 1 allergen. In the inter-laboratory analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 73 allergens, good to 22, moderate to 6 and poor to two allergens. CONCLUSION: The allergen microarray immunoassay, ISAC 112, is a repeatable and reproducible in vitro diagnostic tool for determination of sIgE beyond the own laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3916438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39164382014-02-10 Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique? Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén Lizaso, María T. Goikoetxea, María J. García, Blanca E. Cabrera-Freitag, Paula Trellez, Oswaldo Sanz, María L. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The ImmunoCAP ISAC 112 is a fluoro-immunoassay that allows detection of specific IgE to 112 molecular components from 51 allergenic sources. We studied the reliability of this technique intra- and inter- assay, as well as inter-batch- and inter-laboratory-assay. METHODS: Twenty samples were studied, nineteen sera from polysensitized allergic patients, and the technique calibrator provided by the manufacturer (CTR02). We measured the sIgE from CTR02 and three patients' sera ten times in the same and in different assays. Furthermore, all samples were tested in two laboratories and with two batches of ISAC kit. To evaluate the accuracy of ISAC 112, we contrasted the determinations of CTR02 calibrator with their expected values by T Student test. To analyse the precision, we calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) of the 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, and to analyse the repeatability and the reproducibility, we calculated the intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) to each allergen. RESULTS: The results obtained for CTR02 were similar to those expected in 7 of 15 allergens that generate the calibration curve, whereas in 8 allergens the results showed significant differences. The mean CV obtained in the CTR02 determinations was of 9.4%, and the variability of sera from patients was of 22.9%. The agreement in the intra- and inter-assay analysis was very good to 94 allergens and good to one. In the inter-batch analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 82 allergens, good to 14, moderate to 5 allergens, poor to one, and bad to 1 allergen. In the inter-laboratory analyse, we obtained a very good agreement to 73 allergens, good to 22, moderate to 6 and poor to two allergens. CONCLUSION: The allergen microarray immunoassay, ISAC 112, is a repeatable and reproducible in vitro diagnostic tool for determination of sIgE beyond the own laboratory. Public Library of Science 2014-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3916438/ /pubmed/24516646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394 Text en © 2014 Martínez-Aranguren et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martínez-Aranguren, Rubén
Lizaso, María T.
Goikoetxea, María J.
García, Blanca E.
Cabrera-Freitag, Paula
Trellez, Oswaldo
Sanz, María L.
Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title_full Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title_fullStr Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title_short Is the Determination of Specific IgE against Components Using ISAC 112 a Reproducible Technique?
title_sort is the determination of specific ige against components using isac 112 a reproducible technique?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24516646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088394
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezarangurenruben isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT lizasomariat isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT goikoetxeamariaj isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT garciablancae isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT cabrerafreitagpaula isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT trellezoswaldo isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique
AT sanzmarial isthedeterminationofspecificigeagainstcomponentsusingisac112areproducibletechnique