Cargando…

Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keogh, Sarah C, Fry, Kenzo, Mbugua, Edwin, Ayallo, Mark, Quinn, Heidi, Otieno, George, Ngo, Thoai D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21
_version_ 1782302745392316416
author Keogh, Sarah C
Fry, Kenzo
Mbugua, Edwin
Ayallo, Mark
Quinn, Heidi
Otieno, George
Ngo, Thoai D
author_facet Keogh, Sarah C
Fry, Kenzo
Mbugua, Edwin
Ayallo, Mark
Quinn, Heidi
Otieno, George
Ngo, Thoai D
author_sort Keogh, Sarah C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, particularly in remote rural settings. We compared the effectiveness of VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (the standard approach), versus VL + local anesthesia without analgesics, on pain and satisfaction levels for women undergoing tubal ligations in rural Kenya. METHODS: We conducted a site-randomised non-inferiority trial of 884 women receiving TLs from 40 Marie Stopes mobile outreach sites in Kisii and Machakos Districts. Twenty sites provided VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (control), while 20 offered VL + local anesthesia without additional analgesics (intervention). Pain was measured using a validated 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; satisfaction was measured using 11-point scales. RESULTS: A total of 461 women underwent tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia, while 423 received tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia + analgesics. The majority were aged ≥30 years (78%), and had >3 children (99%). In a multivariate analysis, pain during the procedure was not significantly different between the two groups. The pain score after the procedure was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group (by 0.40 points; p = 0.041). Satisfaction scores were equally high in both groups; 96% would recommend the procedure to a friend. CONCLUSION: VL + local anesthesia is as effective as VL + local anesthesia + analgesics for pain management during tubal ligation in rural Kenya. Avoiding analgesics is associated with numerous benefits including cost savings and fewer issues related to the maintenance, procurement and monitoring of restricted opioid drugs, particularly in remote low-resource settings where these systems are weak. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201304000495942.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3916698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39166982014-02-08 Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial Keogh, Sarah C Fry, Kenzo Mbugua, Edwin Ayallo, Mark Quinn, Heidi Otieno, George Ngo, Thoai D BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, particularly in remote rural settings. We compared the effectiveness of VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (the standard approach), versus VL + local anesthesia without analgesics, on pain and satisfaction levels for women undergoing tubal ligations in rural Kenya. METHODS: We conducted a site-randomised non-inferiority trial of 884 women receiving TLs from 40 Marie Stopes mobile outreach sites in Kisii and Machakos Districts. Twenty sites provided VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (control), while 20 offered VL + local anesthesia without additional analgesics (intervention). Pain was measured using a validated 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; satisfaction was measured using 11-point scales. RESULTS: A total of 461 women underwent tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia, while 423 received tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia + analgesics. The majority were aged ≥30 years (78%), and had >3 children (99%). In a multivariate analysis, pain during the procedure was not significantly different between the two groups. The pain score after the procedure was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group (by 0.40 points; p = 0.041). Satisfaction scores were equally high in both groups; 96% would recommend the procedure to a friend. CONCLUSION: VL + local anesthesia is as effective as VL + local anesthesia + analgesics for pain management during tubal ligation in rural Kenya. Avoiding analgesics is associated with numerous benefits including cost savings and fewer issues related to the maintenance, procurement and monitoring of restricted opioid drugs, particularly in remote low-resource settings where these systems are weak. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201304000495942. BioMed Central 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3916698/ /pubmed/24490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21 Text en Copyright © 2014 Keogh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Keogh, Sarah C
Fry, Kenzo
Mbugua, Edwin
Ayallo, Mark
Quinn, Heidi
Otieno, George
Ngo, Thoai D
Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title_full Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title_short Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
title_sort vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural kenya: a non-inferiority trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21
work_keys_str_mv AT keoghsarahc vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT frykenzo vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT mbuguaedwin vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT ayallomark vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT quinnheidi vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT otienogeorge vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial
AT ngothoaid vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial