Cargando…
Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial
BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, part...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21 |
_version_ | 1782302745392316416 |
---|---|
author | Keogh, Sarah C Fry, Kenzo Mbugua, Edwin Ayallo, Mark Quinn, Heidi Otieno, George Ngo, Thoai D |
author_facet | Keogh, Sarah C Fry, Kenzo Mbugua, Edwin Ayallo, Mark Quinn, Heidi Otieno, George Ngo, Thoai D |
author_sort | Keogh, Sarah C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, particularly in remote rural settings. We compared the effectiveness of VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (the standard approach), versus VL + local anesthesia without analgesics, on pain and satisfaction levels for women undergoing tubal ligations in rural Kenya. METHODS: We conducted a site-randomised non-inferiority trial of 884 women receiving TLs from 40 Marie Stopes mobile outreach sites in Kisii and Machakos Districts. Twenty sites provided VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (control), while 20 offered VL + local anesthesia without additional analgesics (intervention). Pain was measured using a validated 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; satisfaction was measured using 11-point scales. RESULTS: A total of 461 women underwent tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia, while 423 received tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia + analgesics. The majority were aged ≥30 years (78%), and had >3 children (99%). In a multivariate analysis, pain during the procedure was not significantly different between the two groups. The pain score after the procedure was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group (by 0.40 points; p = 0.041). Satisfaction scores were equally high in both groups; 96% would recommend the procedure to a friend. CONCLUSION: VL + local anesthesia is as effective as VL + local anesthesia + analgesics for pain management during tubal ligation in rural Kenya. Avoiding analgesics is associated with numerous benefits including cost savings and fewer issues related to the maintenance, procurement and monitoring of restricted opioid drugs, particularly in remote low-resource settings where these systems are weak. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201304000495942. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3916698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39166982014-02-08 Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial Keogh, Sarah C Fry, Kenzo Mbugua, Edwin Ayallo, Mark Quinn, Heidi Otieno, George Ngo, Thoai D BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, particularly in remote rural settings. We compared the effectiveness of VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (the standard approach), versus VL + local anesthesia without analgesics, on pain and satisfaction levels for women undergoing tubal ligations in rural Kenya. METHODS: We conducted a site-randomised non-inferiority trial of 884 women receiving TLs from 40 Marie Stopes mobile outreach sites in Kisii and Machakos Districts. Twenty sites provided VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (control), while 20 offered VL + local anesthesia without additional analgesics (intervention). Pain was measured using a validated 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; satisfaction was measured using 11-point scales. RESULTS: A total of 461 women underwent tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia, while 423 received tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia + analgesics. The majority were aged ≥30 years (78%), and had >3 children (99%). In a multivariate analysis, pain during the procedure was not significantly different between the two groups. The pain score after the procedure was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group (by 0.40 points; p = 0.041). Satisfaction scores were equally high in both groups; 96% would recommend the procedure to a friend. CONCLUSION: VL + local anesthesia is as effective as VL + local anesthesia + analgesics for pain management during tubal ligation in rural Kenya. Avoiding analgesics is associated with numerous benefits including cost savings and fewer issues related to the maintenance, procurement and monitoring of restricted opioid drugs, particularly in remote low-resource settings where these systems are weak. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201304000495942. BioMed Central 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3916698/ /pubmed/24490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21 Text en Copyright © 2014 Keogh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Keogh, Sarah C Fry, Kenzo Mbugua, Edwin Ayallo, Mark Quinn, Heidi Otieno, George Ngo, Thoai D Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title | Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title_full | Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title_fullStr | Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title_short | Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
title_sort | vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural kenya: a non-inferiority trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keoghsarahc vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT frykenzo vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT mbuguaedwin vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT ayallomark vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT quinnheidi vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT otienogeorge vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial AT ngothoaid vocallocalversuspharmacologicaltreatmentsforpainmanagementintuballigationproceduresinruralkenyaanoninferioritytrial |