Cargando…

Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups

There is very limited scientific data concerning suspension training. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographic activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii between a suspension push-up and traditional push-up. Twenty-one apparently healthy men...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snarr, Ronald L., Esco, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24511343
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0070
_version_ 1782302782072553472
author Snarr, Ronald L.
Esco, Michael R.
author_facet Snarr, Ronald L.
Esco, Michael R.
author_sort Snarr, Ronald L.
collection PubMed
description There is very limited scientific data concerning suspension training. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographic activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii between a suspension push-up and traditional push-up. Twenty-one apparently healthy men (n = 15, age = 25.93 ± 3.67 years) and women (n = 6, age = 23.5 ± 1.97 years) volunteered to participate in this study. All subjects performed four repetitions of a suspension push-up and a traditional push-up where the order of the exercises was randomized. The mean peak and normalized electromyography of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii were compared across the two exercises. Suspension push-ups elicited the following electromyographic values: pectoralis major (3.08 ± 1.13 mV, 69.54 ± 27.6 %MVC), anterior deltoid (5.08 ± 1.55 mV, 81.13 ± 17.77 %MVC), and triceps brachii (5.11 ± 1.97 mV, 105.83 ± 18.54 %MVC). The electromyographic activities during the traditional push-up were as follows: pectoralis major (2.66 ± 1.05 mV, 63.62 ± 16.4 %MVC), anterior deltoid (4.01 ± 1.27 mV, 58.91 ± 20.3 %MVC), and triceps brachii (3.91 ± 1.36 mV, 74.32 ± 16.9 %MVC). The mean peak and normalized electromyographic values were significantly higher for all 3 muscles during the suspension push-up compared to the traditional push-up (p < 0.05). This study suggests that the suspension push-up elicited a greater activation of pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii when compared to a traditional push-up. Therefore, suspension push-ups may be considered an advanced variation of a traditional push-up when a greater challenge is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3916913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39169132014-02-07 Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups Snarr, Ronald L. Esco, Michael R. J Hum Kinet Research Article There is very limited scientific data concerning suspension training. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the electromyographic activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii between a suspension push-up and traditional push-up. Twenty-one apparently healthy men (n = 15, age = 25.93 ± 3.67 years) and women (n = 6, age = 23.5 ± 1.97 years) volunteered to participate in this study. All subjects performed four repetitions of a suspension push-up and a traditional push-up where the order of the exercises was randomized. The mean peak and normalized electromyography of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii were compared across the two exercises. Suspension push-ups elicited the following electromyographic values: pectoralis major (3.08 ± 1.13 mV, 69.54 ± 27.6 %MVC), anterior deltoid (5.08 ± 1.55 mV, 81.13 ± 17.77 %MVC), and triceps brachii (5.11 ± 1.97 mV, 105.83 ± 18.54 %MVC). The electromyographic activities during the traditional push-up were as follows: pectoralis major (2.66 ± 1.05 mV, 63.62 ± 16.4 %MVC), anterior deltoid (4.01 ± 1.27 mV, 58.91 ± 20.3 %MVC), and triceps brachii (3.91 ± 1.36 mV, 74.32 ± 16.9 %MVC). The mean peak and normalized electromyographic values were significantly higher for all 3 muscles during the suspension push-up compared to the traditional push-up (p < 0.05). This study suggests that the suspension push-up elicited a greater activation of pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and triceps brachii when compared to a traditional push-up. Therefore, suspension push-ups may be considered an advanced variation of a traditional push-up when a greater challenge is warranted. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2013-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3916913/ /pubmed/24511343 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0070 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Snarr, Ronald L.
Esco, Michael R.
Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title_full Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title_fullStr Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title_full_unstemmed Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title_short Electromyographic Comparison of Traditional and Suspension Push-Ups
title_sort electromyographic comparison of traditional and suspension push-ups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24511343
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0070
work_keys_str_mv AT snarrronaldl electromyographiccomparisonoftraditionalandsuspensionpushups
AT escomichaelr electromyographiccomparisonoftraditionalandsuspensionpushups