Cargando…
A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Ey...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180 |
_version_ | 1782302831839019008 |
---|---|
author | Agrawal, Siddharth Gupta, Sanjiv K Singh, Vinita Agrawal, Saurabh |
author_facet | Agrawal, Siddharth Gupta, Sanjiv K Singh, Vinita Agrawal, Saurabh |
author_sort | Agrawal, Siddharth |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Eyes with previous failed surgery were excluded. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe connected to a 7 W diathermy followed by bicanalicular intubation under direct visualization. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent standard external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Follow-up was for 24 months and evaluation was done on basis of change in symptoms and lacrimal syringing. Data was analyzed by Chi-square test and unpaired t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Success defined as an asymptomatic patient or freely patent syringing was 92.7% (140 eyes) in RC group and 83.44% (126 eyes) in DCR group. Success was significantly more (P ≤ 0.01) in RC than DCR group. Surgical time was significantly less in RC than DCR (P ≤ 0.001). In RC group, RC could not be performed in three eyes and had to be later taken up for DCR. Intubation after RC was not achieved in four eyes; however these eyes had a patent pathway till 24 months. Twenty-two eyes had a premature extrusion of the tube; but the success rate in these (20 eyes) was comparable to the others within the group (P > 0.05). Two eyes in RC and one in DCR group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe is a quick, simple, and effective alternative to standard external DCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3917389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39173892014-02-19 A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe Agrawal, Siddharth Gupta, Sanjiv K Singh, Vinita Agrawal, Saurabh Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Eyes with previous failed surgery were excluded. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe connected to a 7 W diathermy followed by bicanalicular intubation under direct visualization. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent standard external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Follow-up was for 24 months and evaluation was done on basis of change in symptoms and lacrimal syringing. Data was analyzed by Chi-square test and unpaired t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Success defined as an asymptomatic patient or freely patent syringing was 92.7% (140 eyes) in RC group and 83.44% (126 eyes) in DCR group. Success was significantly more (P ≤ 0.01) in RC than DCR group. Surgical time was significantly less in RC than DCR (P ≤ 0.001). In RC group, RC could not be performed in three eyes and had to be later taken up for DCR. Intubation after RC was not achieved in four eyes; however these eyes had a patent pathway till 24 months. Twenty-two eyes had a premature extrusion of the tube; but the success rate in these (20 eyes) was comparable to the others within the group (P > 0.05). Two eyes in RC and one in DCR group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe is a quick, simple, and effective alternative to standard external DCR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3917389/ /pubmed/24212227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Agrawal, Siddharth Gupta, Sanjiv K Singh, Vinita Agrawal, Saurabh A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title | A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title_full | A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title_fullStr | A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title_short | A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
title_sort | novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrawalsiddharth anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT guptasanjivk anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT singhvinita anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT agrawalsaurabh anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT agrawalsiddharth noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT guptasanjivk noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT singhvinita noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe AT agrawalsaurabh noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe |