Cargando…

A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe

AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Ey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Siddharth, Gupta, Sanjiv K, Singh, Vinita, Agrawal, Saurabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180
_version_ 1782302831839019008
author Agrawal, Siddharth
Gupta, Sanjiv K
Singh, Vinita
Agrawal, Saurabh
author_facet Agrawal, Siddharth
Gupta, Sanjiv K
Singh, Vinita
Agrawal, Saurabh
author_sort Agrawal, Siddharth
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Eyes with previous failed surgery were excluded. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe connected to a 7 W diathermy followed by bicanalicular intubation under direct visualization. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent standard external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Follow-up was for 24 months and evaluation was done on basis of change in symptoms and lacrimal syringing. Data was analyzed by Chi-square test and unpaired t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Success defined as an asymptomatic patient or freely patent syringing was 92.7% (140 eyes) in RC group and 83.44% (126 eyes) in DCR group. Success was significantly more (P ≤ 0.01) in RC than DCR group. Surgical time was significantly less in RC than DCR (P ≤ 0.001). In RC group, RC could not be performed in three eyes and had to be later taken up for DCR. Intubation after RC was not achieved in four eyes; however these eyes had a patent pathway till 24 months. Twenty-two eyes had a premature extrusion of the tube; but the success rate in these (20 eyes) was comparable to the others within the group (P > 0.05). Two eyes in RC and one in DCR group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe is a quick, simple, and effective alternative to standard external DCR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3917389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39173892014-02-19 A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe Agrawal, Siddharth Gupta, Sanjiv K Singh, Vinita Agrawal, Saurabh Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIMS: To evaluate a new approach for recanalization (RC) of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in the treatment of the symptomatic nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, interventional, comparative study in 302 eyes of 209 patients of symptomatic nontraumatic NLDO. Eyes with previous failed surgery were excluded. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe connected to a 7 W diathermy followed by bicanalicular intubation under direct visualization. One hundred and fifty-one eyes underwent standard external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Follow-up was for 24 months and evaluation was done on basis of change in symptoms and lacrimal syringing. Data was analyzed by Chi-square test and unpaired t-test. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Success defined as an asymptomatic patient or freely patent syringing was 92.7% (140 eyes) in RC group and 83.44% (126 eyes) in DCR group. Success was significantly more (P ≤ 0.01) in RC than DCR group. Surgical time was significantly less in RC than DCR (P ≤ 0.001). In RC group, RC could not be performed in three eyes and had to be later taken up for DCR. Intubation after RC was not achieved in four eyes; however these eyes had a patent pathway till 24 months. Twenty-two eyes had a premature extrusion of the tube; but the success rate in these (20 eyes) was comparable to the others within the group (P > 0.05). Two eyes in RC and one in DCR group had complications. CONCLUSIONS: RC with 20 G endodiathermy bipolar probe is a quick, simple, and effective alternative to standard external DCR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3917389/ /pubmed/24212227 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Siddharth
Gupta, Sanjiv K
Singh, Vinita
Agrawal, Saurabh
A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title_full A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title_fullStr A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title_full_unstemmed A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title_short A novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
title_sort novel technique to recanalize the nasolacrimal duct with endodiathermy bipolar probe
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212227
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121180
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalsiddharth anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT guptasanjivk anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT singhvinita anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT agrawalsaurabh anoveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT agrawalsiddharth noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT guptasanjivk noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT singhvinita noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe
AT agrawalsaurabh noveltechniquetorecanalizethenasolacrimalductwithendodiathermybipolarprobe