Cargando…

Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children

PURPOSE: To obtain reference values of RNFL thickness in normal Indian children and to study the association of RNFL thickness with central corneal thickness(CCT) and axial length(AL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 normal Indian children (mean age 8.6 ± 2.9 yrs) were examined on the GDxVCC. The inferio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khamar, Mayuri B, Vasavada, Vaishali, Shah, Sajani K, Trivedi, Rupal H, Thomas, Ravi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212204
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121107
_version_ 1782302832323461120
author Khamar, Mayuri B
Vasavada, Vaishali
Shah, Sajani K
Trivedi, Rupal H
Thomas, Ravi
author_facet Khamar, Mayuri B
Vasavada, Vaishali
Shah, Sajani K
Trivedi, Rupal H
Thomas, Ravi
author_sort Khamar, Mayuri B
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To obtain reference values of RNFL thickness in normal Indian children and to study the association of RNFL thickness with central corneal thickness(CCT) and axial length(AL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 normal Indian children (mean age 8.6 ± 2.9 yrs) were examined on the GDxVCC. The inferior average (IA), superior average (SA), temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) average and nerve fiber index (NFI) values were recorded and compared between males and females as well as between the different age groups. The association of TSNIT average with AL and CCT was examined. RESULTS: Values for the RNFL parameters were-SA: 64.9 ± 9.7, IA: 63.8 ± 8.8, TSNIT average: 53.5 ± 7.7 and NFI 21.5 ± 10.8. Superior, inferior and TSNIT averages did not differ significantly between males and females (P = 0.25, P = 0.19, P = 0.06 respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). No significant differences were found in TSNIT average across age groups. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between CCT and TSNIT average (r = 0.25, r(2) = 0.06, P < 0.001). The correlation TSNIT average and AL(r = −0.12; r(2) = 0.01) was not significant (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Reference values for RNFL parameters reported for Indian children are similar those reported in adults. There is a small correlation between central corneal thickness and RNFL as reflected in average TSNIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3917391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39173912014-02-19 Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children Khamar, Mayuri B Vasavada, Vaishali Shah, Sajani K Trivedi, Rupal H Thomas, Ravi Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To obtain reference values of RNFL thickness in normal Indian children and to study the association of RNFL thickness with central corneal thickness(CCT) and axial length(AL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 200 normal Indian children (mean age 8.6 ± 2.9 yrs) were examined on the GDxVCC. The inferior average (IA), superior average (SA), temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal (TSNIT) average and nerve fiber index (NFI) values were recorded and compared between males and females as well as between the different age groups. The association of TSNIT average with AL and CCT was examined. RESULTS: Values for the RNFL parameters were-SA: 64.9 ± 9.7, IA: 63.8 ± 8.8, TSNIT average: 53.5 ± 7.7 and NFI 21.5 ± 10.8. Superior, inferior and TSNIT averages did not differ significantly between males and females (P = 0.25, P = 0.19, P = 0.06 respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). No significant differences were found in TSNIT average across age groups. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between CCT and TSNIT average (r = 0.25, r(2) = 0.06, P < 0.001). The correlation TSNIT average and AL(r = −0.12; r(2) = 0.01) was not significant (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Reference values for RNFL parameters reported for Indian children are similar those reported in adults. There is a small correlation between central corneal thickness and RNFL as reflected in average TSNIT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3917391/ /pubmed/24212204 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121107 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khamar, Mayuri B
Vasavada, Vaishali
Shah, Sajani K
Trivedi, Rupal H
Thomas, Ravi
Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title_full Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title_fullStr Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title_short Assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) in normal Indian children
title_sort assessment of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry (gdx vcc) in normal indian children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212204
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.121107
work_keys_str_mv AT khamarmayurib assessmentofperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessusingscanninglaserpolarimetrygdxvccinnormalindianchildren
AT vasavadavaishali assessmentofperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessusingscanninglaserpolarimetrygdxvccinnormalindianchildren
AT shahsajanik assessmentofperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessusingscanninglaserpolarimetrygdxvccinnormalindianchildren
AT trivedirupalh assessmentofperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessusingscanninglaserpolarimetrygdxvccinnormalindianchildren
AT thomasravi assessmentofperipapillaryretinalnervefiberlayerthicknessusingscanninglaserpolarimetrygdxvccinnormalindianchildren