Cargando…

In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post

Statement of problem: Techniques and recommendations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth have changed from the use of custom cast metal post and core system to glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) post and composite core system. Has this latest prefabricated glass fiber reinforced post and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Jasjit, Sharma, Navneet, Singh, Harpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50737
_version_ 1782302869510160384
author Kaur, Jasjit
Sharma, Navneet
Singh, Harpal
author_facet Kaur, Jasjit
Sharma, Navneet
Singh, Harpal
author_sort Kaur, Jasjit
collection PubMed
description Statement of problem: Techniques and recommendations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth have changed from the use of custom cast metal post and core system to glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) post and composite core system. Has this latest prefabricated glass fiber reinforced post and composite core system increased the fracture resistance of teeth and reduced the incidence of unrestorable root fractures. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of root fracture and mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with two different post and core systems. Material and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups. (n=20). All teeth received endodontic treatment. First group was restored with custom cast post and core system. Second group was restored with glass fiber post and composite core system. In Both the groups posts were cemented with adhesive resin cement. Compressive load was applied at an angle of 130 to the long axis of teeth at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min until fracture occurred. Data were analyzed with student “t” test P<.001. Results: The mean value for fracture resistance was (331.4025) N in Group -I Custom cast Ni-Cr post and core and (237.0625) N in Group -II Glass fiber reinforced post and composite core system. Students “t” test shows the significant difference in fracture resistance of two groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the incidence of root fracture was significantly higher in custom cast Ni-Cr post and core system than glass fiber post and composite core system. A more favourable mode of failure was observed in teeth restored with Group II glass fiber post system. Key words:Post-and-core technique, glass fiber post, cast post and-core system, fracture resistance, endodontically treated teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3917625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39176252014-02-20 In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post Kaur, Jasjit Sharma, Navneet Singh, Harpal J Clin Exp Dent Research Statement of problem: Techniques and recommendations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth have changed from the use of custom cast metal post and core system to glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) post and composite core system. Has this latest prefabricated glass fiber reinforced post and composite core system increased the fracture resistance of teeth and reduced the incidence of unrestorable root fractures. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of root fracture and mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with two different post and core systems. Material and Methods: Forty maxillary central incisors were randomly divided into two groups. (n=20). All teeth received endodontic treatment. First group was restored with custom cast post and core system. Second group was restored with glass fiber post and composite core system. In Both the groups posts were cemented with adhesive resin cement. Compressive load was applied at an angle of 130 to the long axis of teeth at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min until fracture occurred. Data were analyzed with student “t” test P<.001. Results: The mean value for fracture resistance was (331.4025) N in Group -I Custom cast Ni-Cr post and core and (237.0625) N in Group -II Glass fiber reinforced post and composite core system. Students “t” test shows the significant difference in fracture resistance of two groups. Conclusion: This study showed that the incidence of root fracture was significantly higher in custom cast Ni-Cr post and core system than glass fiber post and composite core system. A more favourable mode of failure was observed in teeth restored with Group II glass fiber post system. Key words:Post-and-core technique, glass fiber post, cast post and-core system, fracture resistance, endodontically treated teeth. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3917625/ /pubmed/24558556 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50737 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kaur, Jasjit
Sharma, Navneet
Singh, Harpal
In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title_full In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title_short In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
title_sort in vitro evaluation of glass fiber post
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558556
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50737
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurjasjit invitroevaluationofglassfiberpost
AT sharmanavneet invitroevaluationofglassfiberpost
AT singhharpal invitroevaluationofglassfiberpost