Cargando…
Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures: a stability study in dogs
Objective: This study compared the effects of three different methods of preparing bone implant sockets (drilling, osteotomes, and piezoelectric device) on osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Study Design: An experimental prospective study was designed. Material and Methods: T...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558558 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50803 |
_version_ | 1782302869971533824 |
---|---|
author | Cano, Jorge Campo, Julián |
author_facet | Cano, Jorge Campo, Julián |
author_sort | Cano, Jorge |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study compared the effects of three different methods of preparing bone implant sockets (drilling, osteotomes, and piezoelectric device) on osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Study Design: An experimental prospective study was designed. Material and Methods: Ten adult beagle dogs were studied. After 5 weeks, 23 out of 28 initially placed implants in the iliac crest were evaluated, comparing these three different procedures of bone implant socket. Student’s t-test (paired, two-tailed) was used to reveal differences among the three groups at each time point (SPSS 16.0, IL, USA). Results: After a 5-week healing period, the implants placed in sockets that were made using an osteotome or piezoelectric device were slightly more stable than those made by drilling. Reduced mechanical and heat injury to the bone is beneficial for maintaining and improving stability during the critical early healing period. Conclusion: Using RFA, there was evidence of a slight increase in implant stability in the iliac crest after 5 weeks of healing when the implant socket was made using a piezoelectric device or expansion procedure as compare with the drilling method. Key words:Bone implant sockets, drilling, osteotomes, piezoelectric, resonance frequency analysis, stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3917627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39176272014-02-20 Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures: a stability study in dogs Cano, Jorge Campo, Julián J Clin Exp Dent Research-Article Objective: This study compared the effects of three different methods of preparing bone implant sockets (drilling, osteotomes, and piezoelectric device) on osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Study Design: An experimental prospective study was designed. Material and Methods: Ten adult beagle dogs were studied. After 5 weeks, 23 out of 28 initially placed implants in the iliac crest were evaluated, comparing these three different procedures of bone implant socket. Student’s t-test (paired, two-tailed) was used to reveal differences among the three groups at each time point (SPSS 16.0, IL, USA). Results: After a 5-week healing period, the implants placed in sockets that were made using an osteotome or piezoelectric device were slightly more stable than those made by drilling. Reduced mechanical and heat injury to the bone is beneficial for maintaining and improving stability during the critical early healing period. Conclusion: Using RFA, there was evidence of a slight increase in implant stability in the iliac crest after 5 weeks of healing when the implant socket was made using a piezoelectric device or expansion procedure as compare with the drilling method. Key words:Bone implant sockets, drilling, osteotomes, piezoelectric, resonance frequency analysis, stability. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3917627/ /pubmed/24558558 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50803 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research-Article Cano, Jorge Campo, Julián Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures: a stability study in dogs |
title | Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
title_full | Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
title_fullStr | Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
title_short | Bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
title_sort | bone implant sockets made using three different procedures:
a stability study in dogs |
topic | Research-Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24558558 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.50803 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canojorge boneimplantsocketsmadeusingthreedifferentproceduresastabilitystudyindogs AT campojulian boneimplantsocketsmadeusingthreedifferentproceduresastabilitystudyindogs |