Cargando…
Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements
BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria mosquitoes is essential for guiding the rational use of insecticides in vector control programs. Resistance bioassay is the first step for insecticide monitoring and it lays an important foundation for molecular examination of resistance mecha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-54 |
_version_ | 1782302896823468032 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Tielong Zhong, Daibin Tang, Linhua Chang, Xuelian Fu, Fengyang Yan, Guiyun Zheng, Bin |
author_facet | Xu, Tielong Zhong, Daibin Tang, Linhua Chang, Xuelian Fu, Fengyang Yan, Guiyun Zheng, Bin |
author_sort | Xu, Tielong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria mosquitoes is essential for guiding the rational use of insecticides in vector control programs. Resistance bioassay is the first step for insecticide monitoring and it lays an important foundation for molecular examination of resistance mechanisms. In the literature, various mosquito sample collection and preparation methods have been used, but how mosquito sample collection and preparation methods affect insecticide susceptibility bioassay results is largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine whether mosquito sample collection and preparation methods affected bioassay results, which may cause incorrect classification of mosquito resistance status. METHODS: The study was conducted in Anopheles sinensis mosquitoes in two study sites in central China. Three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods were compared for insecticide susceptibility, kdr frequencies and metabolic enzyme activities: 1) adult mosquitoes collected from the field; 2) F1 adults from field collected, blood-fed mosquitoes; and 3) adult mosquitoes reared from field collected larvae. RESULTS: Mosquito sample collection and preparation methods significantly affected mortality rates in the standard WHO tube resistance bioassay. Mortality rate of field-collected female adults was 10-15% higher than in mosquitoes reared from field-collected larvae and F1 adults from field collected blood-fed females. This pattern was consistent in mosquitoes from the two study sites. High kdr mutation frequency (85-95%) with L1014F allele as the predominant mutation was found in our study populations. Field-collected female adults consistently exhibited the highest monooxygenase and GST activities. The higher mortality rate observed in the field-collected female mosquitoes may have been caused by a mixture of mosquitoes of different ages, as older mosquitoes were more susceptible to deltamethrin than younger mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Female adults reared from field-collected larvae in resistance bioassays are recommended to minimize the effect of confounding factors such as mosquito age and blood feeding status so that more reliable and reproducible mortality may be obtained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3917893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39178932014-02-08 Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements Xu, Tielong Zhong, Daibin Tang, Linhua Chang, Xuelian Fu, Fengyang Yan, Guiyun Zheng, Bin Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria mosquitoes is essential for guiding the rational use of insecticides in vector control programs. Resistance bioassay is the first step for insecticide monitoring and it lays an important foundation for molecular examination of resistance mechanisms. In the literature, various mosquito sample collection and preparation methods have been used, but how mosquito sample collection and preparation methods affect insecticide susceptibility bioassay results is largely unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine whether mosquito sample collection and preparation methods affected bioassay results, which may cause incorrect classification of mosquito resistance status. METHODS: The study was conducted in Anopheles sinensis mosquitoes in two study sites in central China. Three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods were compared for insecticide susceptibility, kdr frequencies and metabolic enzyme activities: 1) adult mosquitoes collected from the field; 2) F1 adults from field collected, blood-fed mosquitoes; and 3) adult mosquitoes reared from field collected larvae. RESULTS: Mosquito sample collection and preparation methods significantly affected mortality rates in the standard WHO tube resistance bioassay. Mortality rate of field-collected female adults was 10-15% higher than in mosquitoes reared from field-collected larvae and F1 adults from field collected blood-fed females. This pattern was consistent in mosquitoes from the two study sites. High kdr mutation frequency (85-95%) with L1014F allele as the predominant mutation was found in our study populations. Field-collected female adults consistently exhibited the highest monooxygenase and GST activities. The higher mortality rate observed in the field-collected female mosquitoes may have been caused by a mixture of mosquitoes of different ages, as older mosquitoes were more susceptible to deltamethrin than younger mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Female adults reared from field-collected larvae in resistance bioassays are recommended to minimize the effect of confounding factors such as mosquito age and blood feeding status so that more reliable and reproducible mortality may be obtained. BioMed Central 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3917893/ /pubmed/24472598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-54 Text en Copyright © 2014 Xu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Xu, Tielong Zhong, Daibin Tang, Linhua Chang, Xuelian Fu, Fengyang Yan, Guiyun Zheng, Bin Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title | Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title_full | Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title_fullStr | Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title_short | Anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
title_sort | anopheles sinensis mosquito insecticide resistance: comparison of three mosquito sample collection and preparation methods and mosquito age in resistance measurements |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3917893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-54 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xutielong anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT zhongdaibin anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT tanglinhua anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT changxuelian anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT fufengyang anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT yanguiyun anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements AT zhengbin anophelessinensismosquitoinsecticideresistancecomparisonofthreemosquitosamplecollectionandpreparationmethodsandmosquitoageinresistancemeasurements |