Cargando…
The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds?
SUMMARY: Competition between microbial species is a product of, yet can lead to a reduction in, the microbial diversity of specific habitats. Microbial habitats can resemble ecological battlefields where microbial cells struggle to dominate and/or annihilate each other and we explore the hypothesis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23336673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12027 |
_version_ | 1782302935407919104 |
---|---|
author | Cray, Jonathan A Bell, Andrew N W Bhaganna, Prashanth Mswaka, Allen Y Timson, David J Hallsworth, John E |
author_facet | Cray, Jonathan A Bell, Andrew N W Bhaganna, Prashanth Mswaka, Allen Y Timson, David J Hallsworth, John E |
author_sort | Cray, Jonathan A |
collection | PubMed |
description | SUMMARY: Competition between microbial species is a product of, yet can lead to a reduction in, the microbial diversity of specific habitats. Microbial habitats can resemble ecological battlefields where microbial cells struggle to dominate and/or annihilate each other and we explore the hypothesis that (like plant weeds) some microbes are genetically hard-wired to behave in a vigorous and ecologically aggressive manner. These ‘microbial weeds’ are able to dominate the communities that develop in fertile but uncolonized – or at least partially vacant – habitats via traits enabling them to out-grow competitors; robust tolerances to habitat-relevant stress parameters and highly efficient energy-generation systems; avoidance of or resistance to viral infection, predation and grazers; potent antimicrobial systems; and exceptional abilities to sequester and store resources. In addition, those associated with nutritionally complex habitats are extraordinarily versatile in their utilization of diverse substrates. Weed species typically deploy multiple types of antimicrobial including toxins; volatile organic compounds that act as either hydrophobic or highly chaotropic stressors; biosurfactants; organic acids; and moderately chaotropic solutes that are produced in bulk quantities (e.g. acetone, ethanol). Whereas ability to dominate communities is habitat-specific we suggest that some microbial species are archetypal weeds including generalists such as: Pichia anomala, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas putida; specialists such as Dunaliella salina, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria; freshwater autotrophs Gonyostomum semen and Microcystis aeruginosa; obligate anaerobes such as Clostridium acetobutylicum; facultative pathogens such as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Pantoea ananatis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and other extremotolerant and extremophilic microbes such as Aspergillus spp., Salinibacter ruber and Haloquadratum walsbyi. Some microbes, such as Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium smegmatis and Pseudoxylaria spp., exhibit characteristics of both weed and non-weed species. We propose that the concept of nonweeds represents a ‘dustbin’ group that includes species such as Synodropsis spp., Polypaecilum pisce, Metschnikowia orientalis, Salmonella spp., and Caulobacter crescentus. We show that microbial weeds are conceptually distinct from plant weeds, microbial copiotrophs, r-strategists, and other ecophysiological groups of microorganism. Microbial weed species are unlikely to emerge from stationary-phase or other types of closed communities; it is open habitats that select for weed phenotypes. Specific characteristics that are common to diverse types of open habitat are identified, and implications of weed biology and open-habitat ecology are discussed in the context of further studies needed in the fields of environmental and applied microbiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3918151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39181512014-02-12 The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? Cray, Jonathan A Bell, Andrew N W Bhaganna, Prashanth Mswaka, Allen Y Timson, David J Hallsworth, John E Microb Biotechnol Minireviews SUMMARY: Competition between microbial species is a product of, yet can lead to a reduction in, the microbial diversity of specific habitats. Microbial habitats can resemble ecological battlefields where microbial cells struggle to dominate and/or annihilate each other and we explore the hypothesis that (like plant weeds) some microbes are genetically hard-wired to behave in a vigorous and ecologically aggressive manner. These ‘microbial weeds’ are able to dominate the communities that develop in fertile but uncolonized – or at least partially vacant – habitats via traits enabling them to out-grow competitors; robust tolerances to habitat-relevant stress parameters and highly efficient energy-generation systems; avoidance of or resistance to viral infection, predation and grazers; potent antimicrobial systems; and exceptional abilities to sequester and store resources. In addition, those associated with nutritionally complex habitats are extraordinarily versatile in their utilization of diverse substrates. Weed species typically deploy multiple types of antimicrobial including toxins; volatile organic compounds that act as either hydrophobic or highly chaotropic stressors; biosurfactants; organic acids; and moderately chaotropic solutes that are produced in bulk quantities (e.g. acetone, ethanol). Whereas ability to dominate communities is habitat-specific we suggest that some microbial species are archetypal weeds including generalists such as: Pichia anomala, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas putida; specialists such as Dunaliella salina, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria; freshwater autotrophs Gonyostomum semen and Microcystis aeruginosa; obligate anaerobes such as Clostridium acetobutylicum; facultative pathogens such as Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Pantoea ananatis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and other extremotolerant and extremophilic microbes such as Aspergillus spp., Salinibacter ruber and Haloquadratum walsbyi. Some microbes, such as Escherichia coli, Mycobacterium smegmatis and Pseudoxylaria spp., exhibit characteristics of both weed and non-weed species. We propose that the concept of nonweeds represents a ‘dustbin’ group that includes species such as Synodropsis spp., Polypaecilum pisce, Metschnikowia orientalis, Salmonella spp., and Caulobacter crescentus. We show that microbial weeds are conceptually distinct from plant weeds, microbial copiotrophs, r-strategists, and other ecophysiological groups of microorganism. Microbial weed species are unlikely to emerge from stationary-phase or other types of closed communities; it is open habitats that select for weed phenotypes. Specific characteristics that are common to diverse types of open habitat are identified, and implications of weed biology and open-habitat ecology are discussed in the context of further studies needed in the fields of environmental and applied microbiology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2013-09 2013-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3918151/ /pubmed/23336673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12027 Text en Journal compilation © 2013 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Cray, Jonathan A Bell, Andrew N W Bhaganna, Prashanth Mswaka, Allen Y Timson, David J Hallsworth, John E The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title | The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title_full | The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title_fullStr | The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title_full_unstemmed | The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title_short | The biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
title_sort | biology of habitat dominance; can microbes behave as weeds? |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23336673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crayjonathana thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT bellandrewnw thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT bhagannaprashanth thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT mswakaalleny thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT timsondavidj thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT hallsworthjohne thebiologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT crayjonathana biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT bellandrewnw biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT bhagannaprashanth biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT mswakaalleny biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT timsondavidj biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds AT hallsworthjohne biologyofhabitatdominancecanmicrobesbehaveasweeds |