Cargando…

Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare treatment outcomes for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB cervical carcinoma patients receiving radical surgery followed by adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Medical records of FIGO stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chai, Yanlan, Wang, Tao, Wang, Juan, Yang, Yunyi, Gao, Ying, Gao, Jiyong, Gao, Shangfeng, Wang, Yueling, Zhou, Xi, Liu, Zi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-63
_version_ 1782302938438303744
author Chai, Yanlan
Wang, Tao
Wang, Juan
Yang, Yunyi
Gao, Ying
Gao, Jiyong
Gao, Shangfeng
Wang, Yueling
Zhou, Xi
Liu, Zi
author_facet Chai, Yanlan
Wang, Tao
Wang, Juan
Yang, Yunyi
Gao, Ying
Gao, Jiyong
Gao, Shangfeng
Wang, Yueling
Zhou, Xi
Liu, Zi
author_sort Chai, Yanlan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare treatment outcomes for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB cervical carcinoma patients receiving radical surgery followed by adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Medical records of FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer patients treated between July 2008 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 148 patients underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (surgery-based group). These patients were compared with 290 patients that received radical radiotherapy alone (RT-based group). Recurrence rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control rates, and treatment-related complications were compared for these two groups. RESULTS: Similar rates of recurrence (16.89% vs. 12.41%, p = 0.200), PFS (log-rank, p = 0.211), OS (log-rank, p = 0.347), and local control rates (log-rank, p = 0.668) were observed for the surgery-based group and the RT-based group, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of acute grade 3–4 gastrointestinal reactions and late grade 3–4 lower limb lymphedema were significantly higher for the surgery-based group versus the RT-based group. Cox multivariate analyses found no significant difference in survival outcome between the two groups, and tumor diameter and histopathology were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Radical radiotherapy was associated with fewer treatment-related complications and achieved comparable survival outcomes for patients with FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer compared to radical hysterectomy followed by postoperative radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3918172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39181722014-02-09 Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer Chai, Yanlan Wang, Tao Wang, Juan Yang, Yunyi Gao, Ying Gao, Jiyong Gao, Shangfeng Wang, Yueling Zhou, Xi Liu, Zi BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare treatment outcomes for Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB cervical carcinoma patients receiving radical surgery followed by adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Medical records of FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer patients treated between July 2008 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 148 patients underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (surgery-based group). These patients were compared with 290 patients that received radical radiotherapy alone (RT-based group). Recurrence rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control rates, and treatment-related complications were compared for these two groups. RESULTS: Similar rates of recurrence (16.89% vs. 12.41%, p = 0.200), PFS (log-rank, p = 0.211), OS (log-rank, p = 0.347), and local control rates (log-rank, p = 0.668) were observed for the surgery-based group and the RT-based group, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of acute grade 3–4 gastrointestinal reactions and late grade 3–4 lower limb lymphedema were significantly higher for the surgery-based group versus the RT-based group. Cox multivariate analyses found no significant difference in survival outcome between the two groups, and tumor diameter and histopathology were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Radical radiotherapy was associated with fewer treatment-related complications and achieved comparable survival outcomes for patients with FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer compared to radical hysterectomy followed by postoperative radiotherapy. BioMed Central 2014-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3918172/ /pubmed/24495453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-63 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chai et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chai, Yanlan
Wang, Tao
Wang, Juan
Yang, Yunyi
Gao, Ying
Gao, Jiyong
Gao, Shangfeng
Wang, Yueling
Zhou, Xi
Liu, Zi
Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title_full Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title_fullStr Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title_short Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
title_sort radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for figo stage iib cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-63
work_keys_str_mv AT chaiyanlan radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT wangtao radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT wangjuan radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT yangyunyi radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT gaoying radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT gaojiyong radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT gaoshangfeng radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT wangyueling radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT zhouxi radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer
AT liuzi radicalhysterectomywithadjuvantradiotherapyversusradicalradiotherapyforfigostageiibcervicalcancer