Cargando…
Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma
Since the introduction of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide, more patients with multiple myeloma are achieving deep, durable responses and disease control, and are living longer. These improvements have afforded more robust analys...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.220 |
_version_ | 1782302997919825920 |
---|---|
author | Lonial, S Anderson, K C |
author_facet | Lonial, S Anderson, K C |
author_sort | Lonial, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the introduction of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide, more patients with multiple myeloma are achieving deep, durable responses and disease control, and are living longer. These improvements have afforded more robust analyses of the relationship between response and survival. Generally, these studies have demonstrated that improvements in the quality of response across all stages of treatment are associated with better disease control and longer survival. Thus, achievement of maximal response should be strongly considered, particularly in the frontline setting, but must also be balanced with tolerability, quality of life and patient preferences. In select patients, achievement of a lesser response may be adequate to prolong survival, and attempts to treat these patients to a deeper response may place them at unnecessary risk without significant benefit. Maintenance therapy has been shown to improve the quality of response and disease control and, in some studies, survival. Studies support maintenance therapy for high-risk patients as a standard of care, and there are emerging data supporting maintenance therapy in standard-risk patients to improve progression-free and possibly overall survival. Multidrug regimens combining a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD have shown exceptional response outcomes with acceptable increases in toxicity in both the frontline and salvage settings, and are becoming a standard treatment approach. Moving forward, the use of immunophenotypic and molecular response criteria will be essential in better understanding the impact of highly active and continuous treatment regimens across myeloma patient populations. Future translational studies will help to develop antimyeloma agents to their fullest potential. The introduction of novel targeted therapies, including the IMiD pomalidomide and the proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib and ixazomib (MLN9708), will provide greater options to individualize treatment and help patients achieve a clinically meaningful response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3918869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39188692014-02-10 Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma Lonial, S Anderson, K C Leukemia Review Since the introduction of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide, more patients with multiple myeloma are achieving deep, durable responses and disease control, and are living longer. These improvements have afforded more robust analyses of the relationship between response and survival. Generally, these studies have demonstrated that improvements in the quality of response across all stages of treatment are associated with better disease control and longer survival. Thus, achievement of maximal response should be strongly considered, particularly in the frontline setting, but must also be balanced with tolerability, quality of life and patient preferences. In select patients, achievement of a lesser response may be adequate to prolong survival, and attempts to treat these patients to a deeper response may place them at unnecessary risk without significant benefit. Maintenance therapy has been shown to improve the quality of response and disease control and, in some studies, survival. Studies support maintenance therapy for high-risk patients as a standard of care, and there are emerging data supporting maintenance therapy in standard-risk patients to improve progression-free and possibly overall survival. Multidrug regimens combining a proteasome inhibitor and an IMiD have shown exceptional response outcomes with acceptable increases in toxicity in both the frontline and salvage settings, and are becoming a standard treatment approach. Moving forward, the use of immunophenotypic and molecular response criteria will be essential in better understanding the impact of highly active and continuous treatment regimens across myeloma patient populations. Future translational studies will help to develop antimyeloma agents to their fullest potential. The introduction of novel targeted therapies, including the IMiD pomalidomide and the proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib and ixazomib (MLN9708), will provide greater options to individualize treatment and help patients achieve a clinically meaningful response. Nature Publishing Group 2014-02 2013-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3918869/ /pubmed/23868105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.220 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Lonial, S Anderson, K C Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title | Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title_full | Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title_short | Association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
title_sort | association of response endpoints with survival outcomes in multiple myeloma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3918869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23868105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lonials associationofresponseendpointswithsurvivaloutcomesinmultiplemyeloma AT andersonkc associationofresponseendpointswithsurvivaloutcomesinmultiplemyeloma |