Cargando…

Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method

The process of iterative structure-based drug design involves the X-ray crystal structure determination of upwards of 100 ligands with the same general scaffold (i.e. chemotype) complexed with very similar, if not identical, protein targets. In conjunction with insights from computational models and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klei, Herbert E., Moriarty, Nigel W., Echols, Nathaniel, Terwilliger, Thomas C., Baldwin, Eric T., Pokross, Matt, Posy, Shana, Adams, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004713030071
_version_ 1782303038651760640
author Klei, Herbert E.
Moriarty, Nigel W.
Echols, Nathaniel
Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Baldwin, Eric T.
Pokross, Matt
Posy, Shana
Adams, Paul D.
author_facet Klei, Herbert E.
Moriarty, Nigel W.
Echols, Nathaniel
Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Baldwin, Eric T.
Pokross, Matt
Posy, Shana
Adams, Paul D.
author_sort Klei, Herbert E.
collection PubMed
description The process of iterative structure-based drug design involves the X-ray crystal structure determination of upwards of 100 ligands with the same general scaffold (i.e. chemotype) complexed with very similar, if not identical, protein targets. In conjunction with insights from computational models and assays, this collection of crystal structures is analyzed to improve potency, to achieve better selectivity and to reduce liabilities such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology. Current methods for modeling ligands into electron-density maps typically do not utilize information on how similar ligands bound in related structures. Even if the electron density is of sufficient quality and resolution to allow de novo placement, the process can take considerable time as the size, complexity and torsional degrees of freedom of the ligands increase. A new module, Guided Ligand Replacement (GLR), was developed in Phenix to increase the ease and success rate of ligand placement when prior protein–ligand complexes are available. At the heart of GLR is an algorithm based on graph theory that associates atoms in the target ligand with analogous atoms in the reference ligand. Based on this correspondence, a set of coordinates is generated for the target ligand. GLR is especially useful in two situations: (i) modeling a series of large, flexible, complicated or macrocyclic ligands in successive structures and (ii) modeling ligands as part of a refinement pipeline that can automatically select a reference structure. Even in those cases for which no reference structure is available, if there are multiple copies of the bound ligand per asymmetric unit GLR offers an efficient way to complete the model after the first ligand has been placed. In all of these applications, GLR leverages prior knowledge from earlier structures to facilitate ligand placement in the current structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3919265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39192652014-02-13 Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method Klei, Herbert E. Moriarty, Nigel W. Echols, Nathaniel Terwilliger, Thomas C. Baldwin, Eric T. Pokross, Matt Posy, Shana Adams, Paul D. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Research Papers The process of iterative structure-based drug design involves the X-ray crystal structure determination of upwards of 100 ligands with the same general scaffold (i.e. chemotype) complexed with very similar, if not identical, protein targets. In conjunction with insights from computational models and assays, this collection of crystal structures is analyzed to improve potency, to achieve better selectivity and to reduce liabilities such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicology. Current methods for modeling ligands into electron-density maps typically do not utilize information on how similar ligands bound in related structures. Even if the electron density is of sufficient quality and resolution to allow de novo placement, the process can take considerable time as the size, complexity and torsional degrees of freedom of the ligands increase. A new module, Guided Ligand Replacement (GLR), was developed in Phenix to increase the ease and success rate of ligand placement when prior protein–ligand complexes are available. At the heart of GLR is an algorithm based on graph theory that associates atoms in the target ligand with analogous atoms in the reference ligand. Based on this correspondence, a set of coordinates is generated for the target ligand. GLR is especially useful in two situations: (i) modeling a series of large, flexible, complicated or macrocyclic ligands in successive structures and (ii) modeling ligands as part of a refinement pipeline that can automatically select a reference structure. Even in those cases for which no reference structure is available, if there are multiple copies of the bound ligand per asymmetric unit GLR offers an efficient way to complete the model after the first ligand has been placed. In all of these applications, GLR leverages prior knowledge from earlier structures to facilitate ligand placement in the current structure. International Union of Crystallography 2013-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3919265/ /pubmed/24419386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004713030071 Text en © Klei et al. 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Klei, Herbert E.
Moriarty, Nigel W.
Echols, Nathaniel
Terwilliger, Thomas C.
Baldwin, Eric T.
Pokross, Matt
Posy, Shana
Adams, Paul D.
Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title_full Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title_fullStr Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title_full_unstemmed Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title_short Ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
title_sort ligand placement based on prior structures: the guided ligand-replacement method
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1399004713030071
work_keys_str_mv AT kleiherberte ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT moriartynigelw ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT echolsnathaniel ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT terwilligerthomasc ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT baldwinerict ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT pokrossmatt ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT posyshana ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod
AT adamspauld ligandplacementbasedonpriorstructurestheguidedligandreplacementmethod