Cargando…

Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skinner, Marilyn D., Lahmek, Pierre, Pham, Héloïse, Aubin, Henri-Jean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366
_version_ 1782303066834337792
author Skinner, Marilyn D.
Lahmek, Pierre
Pham, Héloïse
Aubin, Henri-Jean
author_facet Skinner, Marilyn D.
Lahmek, Pierre
Pham, Héloïse
Aubin, Henri-Jean
author_sort Skinner, Marilyn D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to analyze the efficacy and safety of disulfiram in RCTs in supporting abstinence and (2) to compare blind versus open-label studies, hypothesizing that blinded studies would show no difference between disulfiram and control groups because the threat would be evenly spread across all groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for RCTs on disulfiram use with alcoholics in comparison to any alcoholic control group. The primary outcome was defined by the authors of each trial. Additional analyses included: blind vs. open-label, with or without supervision, cocaine study or not, and type of control. Overall, the 22 included studies showed a higher success rate of disulfiram compared to controls Hedges'g = .58 (95%CI = .35–.82). When comparing blind and open-label RCTs, only open-label trials showed a significant superiority over controls g = .70 (95%CI = .46–.93). RCTs with blind designs showed no efficacy of disulfiram compared to controls. Disulfiram was also more effective than the control condition when compared to naltrexone g = .77, 95%CI = .52–1.02, to acamprosate g = .76, 95%CI = .04–1.48, and to the no disulfiram groups g = .43, 95%CI = .17–.69. Limits include: (1) a population of 89% male subjects and (2) a high but unavoidable heterogeneity of the studies with a substantial I-square in most subgroups of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded studies were incapable of distinguishing a difference between treatment groups and thus are incompatible with disulfiram research. Based on results with open-label studies, disulfiram is a safe and efficacious treatment compared to other abstinence supportive pharmacological treatments or to no disulfiram in supervised studies for problems of alcohol abuse or dependence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3919718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39197182014-02-11 Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis Skinner, Marilyn D. Lahmek, Pierre Pham, Héloïse Aubin, Henri-Jean PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to analyze the efficacy and safety of disulfiram in RCTs in supporting abstinence and (2) to compare blind versus open-label studies, hypothesizing that blinded studies would show no difference between disulfiram and control groups because the threat would be evenly spread across all groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for RCTs on disulfiram use with alcoholics in comparison to any alcoholic control group. The primary outcome was defined by the authors of each trial. Additional analyses included: blind vs. open-label, with or without supervision, cocaine study or not, and type of control. Overall, the 22 included studies showed a higher success rate of disulfiram compared to controls Hedges'g = .58 (95%CI = .35–.82). When comparing blind and open-label RCTs, only open-label trials showed a significant superiority over controls g = .70 (95%CI = .46–.93). RCTs with blind designs showed no efficacy of disulfiram compared to controls. Disulfiram was also more effective than the control condition when compared to naltrexone g = .77, 95%CI = .52–1.02, to acamprosate g = .76, 95%CI = .04–1.48, and to the no disulfiram groups g = .43, 95%CI = .17–.69. Limits include: (1) a population of 89% male subjects and (2) a high but unavoidable heterogeneity of the studies with a substantial I-square in most subgroups of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded studies were incapable of distinguishing a difference between treatment groups and thus are incompatible with disulfiram research. Based on results with open-label studies, disulfiram is a safe and efficacious treatment compared to other abstinence supportive pharmacological treatments or to no disulfiram in supervised studies for problems of alcohol abuse or dependence. Public Library of Science 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3919718/ /pubmed/24520330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366 Text en © 2014 Skinner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skinner, Marilyn D.
Lahmek, Pierre
Pham, Héloïse
Aubin, Henri-Jean
Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort disulfiram efficacy in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366
work_keys_str_mv AT skinnermarilynd disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis
AT lahmekpierre disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis
AT phamheloise disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis
AT aubinhenrijean disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis