Cargando…
Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to ana...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366 |
_version_ | 1782303066834337792 |
---|---|
author | Skinner, Marilyn D. Lahmek, Pierre Pham, Héloïse Aubin, Henri-Jean |
author_facet | Skinner, Marilyn D. Lahmek, Pierre Pham, Héloïse Aubin, Henri-Jean |
author_sort | Skinner, Marilyn D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to analyze the efficacy and safety of disulfiram in RCTs in supporting abstinence and (2) to compare blind versus open-label studies, hypothesizing that blinded studies would show no difference between disulfiram and control groups because the threat would be evenly spread across all groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for RCTs on disulfiram use with alcoholics in comparison to any alcoholic control group. The primary outcome was defined by the authors of each trial. Additional analyses included: blind vs. open-label, with or without supervision, cocaine study or not, and type of control. Overall, the 22 included studies showed a higher success rate of disulfiram compared to controls Hedges'g = .58 (95%CI = .35–.82). When comparing blind and open-label RCTs, only open-label trials showed a significant superiority over controls g = .70 (95%CI = .46–.93). RCTs with blind designs showed no efficacy of disulfiram compared to controls. Disulfiram was also more effective than the control condition when compared to naltrexone g = .77, 95%CI = .52–1.02, to acamprosate g = .76, 95%CI = .04–1.48, and to the no disulfiram groups g = .43, 95%CI = .17–.69. Limits include: (1) a population of 89% male subjects and (2) a high but unavoidable heterogeneity of the studies with a substantial I-square in most subgroups of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded studies were incapable of distinguishing a difference between treatment groups and thus are incompatible with disulfiram research. Based on results with open-label studies, disulfiram is a safe and efficacious treatment compared to other abstinence supportive pharmacological treatments or to no disulfiram in supervised studies for problems of alcohol abuse or dependence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3919718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39197182014-02-11 Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis Skinner, Marilyn D. Lahmek, Pierre Pham, Héloïse Aubin, Henri-Jean PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite its success with compliant or supervised patients, disulfiram has been a controversial medication in the treatment of alcoholism. Often, study designs did not recognize a pivotal factor in disulfiram research, the importance of an open-label design. Our objectives are: (1) to analyze the efficacy and safety of disulfiram in RCTs in supporting abstinence and (2) to compare blind versus open-label studies, hypothesizing that blinded studies would show no difference between disulfiram and control groups because the threat would be evenly spread across all groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for RCTs on disulfiram use with alcoholics in comparison to any alcoholic control group. The primary outcome was defined by the authors of each trial. Additional analyses included: blind vs. open-label, with or without supervision, cocaine study or not, and type of control. Overall, the 22 included studies showed a higher success rate of disulfiram compared to controls Hedges'g = .58 (95%CI = .35–.82). When comparing blind and open-label RCTs, only open-label trials showed a significant superiority over controls g = .70 (95%CI = .46–.93). RCTs with blind designs showed no efficacy of disulfiram compared to controls. Disulfiram was also more effective than the control condition when compared to naltrexone g = .77, 95%CI = .52–1.02, to acamprosate g = .76, 95%CI = .04–1.48, and to the no disulfiram groups g = .43, 95%CI = .17–.69. Limits include: (1) a population of 89% male subjects and (2) a high but unavoidable heterogeneity of the studies with a substantial I-square in most subgroups of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Blinded studies were incapable of distinguishing a difference between treatment groups and thus are incompatible with disulfiram research. Based on results with open-label studies, disulfiram is a safe and efficacious treatment compared to other abstinence supportive pharmacological treatments or to no disulfiram in supervised studies for problems of alcohol abuse or dependence. Public Library of Science 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3919718/ /pubmed/24520330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366 Text en © 2014 Skinner et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Skinner, Marilyn D. Lahmek, Pierre Pham, Héloïse Aubin, Henri-Jean Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Disulfiram Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | disulfiram efficacy in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skinnermarilynd disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis AT lahmekpierre disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis AT phamheloise disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis AT aubinhenrijean disulfiramefficacyinthetreatmentofalcoholdependenceametaanalysis |