Cargando…

The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex

Humans in all societies form and participate in cooperative alliances. To successfully navigate an alliance-laced world, the human mind needs to detect new coalitions and alliances as they emerge, and predict which of many potential alliance categories are currently organizing an interaction. We pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pietraszewski, David, Cosmides, Leda, Tooby, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088534
_version_ 1782303077434392576
author Pietraszewski, David
Cosmides, Leda
Tooby, John
author_facet Pietraszewski, David
Cosmides, Leda
Tooby, John
author_sort Pietraszewski, David
collection PubMed
description Humans in all societies form and participate in cooperative alliances. To successfully navigate an alliance-laced world, the human mind needs to detect new coalitions and alliances as they emerge, and predict which of many potential alliance categories are currently organizing an interaction. We propose that evolution has equipped the mind with cognitive machinery that is specialized for performing these functions: an alliance detection system. In this view, racial categories do not exist because skin color is perceptually salient; they are constructed and regulated by the alliance system in environments where race predicts social alliances and divisions. Early tests using adversarial alliances showed that the mind spontaneously detects which individuals are cooperating against a common enemy, implicitly assigning people to rival alliance categories based on patterns of cooperation and competition. But is social antagonism necessary to trigger the categorization of people by alliance—that is, do we cognitively link A and B into an alliance category only because they are jointly in conflict with C and D? We report new studies demonstrating that peaceful cooperation can trigger the detection of new coalitional alliances and make race fade in relevance. Alliances did not need to be marked by team colors or other perceptually salient cues. When race did not predict the ongoing alliance structure, behavioral cues about cooperative activities up-regulated categorization by coalition and down-regulated categorization by race, sometimes eliminating it. Alliance cues that sensitively regulated categorization by coalition and race had no effect on categorization by sex, eliminating many alternative explanations for the results. The results support the hypothesis that categorizing people by their race is a reversible product of a cognitive system specialized for detecting alliance categories and regulating their use. Common enemies are not necessary to erase important social boundaries; peaceful cooperation can have the same effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3919763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39197632014-02-11 The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex Pietraszewski, David Cosmides, Leda Tooby, John PLoS One Research Article Humans in all societies form and participate in cooperative alliances. To successfully navigate an alliance-laced world, the human mind needs to detect new coalitions and alliances as they emerge, and predict which of many potential alliance categories are currently organizing an interaction. We propose that evolution has equipped the mind with cognitive machinery that is specialized for performing these functions: an alliance detection system. In this view, racial categories do not exist because skin color is perceptually salient; they are constructed and regulated by the alliance system in environments where race predicts social alliances and divisions. Early tests using adversarial alliances showed that the mind spontaneously detects which individuals are cooperating against a common enemy, implicitly assigning people to rival alliance categories based on patterns of cooperation and competition. But is social antagonism necessary to trigger the categorization of people by alliance—that is, do we cognitively link A and B into an alliance category only because they are jointly in conflict with C and D? We report new studies demonstrating that peaceful cooperation can trigger the detection of new coalitional alliances and make race fade in relevance. Alliances did not need to be marked by team colors or other perceptually salient cues. When race did not predict the ongoing alliance structure, behavioral cues about cooperative activities up-regulated categorization by coalition and down-regulated categorization by race, sometimes eliminating it. Alliance cues that sensitively regulated categorization by coalition and race had no effect on categorization by sex, eliminating many alternative explanations for the results. The results support the hypothesis that categorizing people by their race is a reversible product of a cognitive system specialized for detecting alliance categories and regulating their use. Common enemies are not necessary to erase important social boundaries; peaceful cooperation can have the same effect. Public Library of Science 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3919763/ /pubmed/24520394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088534 Text en © 2014 Pietraszewski et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pietraszewski, David
Cosmides, Leda
Tooby, John
The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title_full The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title_fullStr The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title_full_unstemmed The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title_short The Content of Our Cooperation, Not the Color of Our Skin: An Alliance Detection System Regulates Categorization by Coalition and Race, but Not Sex
title_sort content of our cooperation, not the color of our skin: an alliance detection system regulates categorization by coalition and race, but not sex
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24520394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088534
work_keys_str_mv AT pietraszewskidavid thecontentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex
AT cosmidesleda thecontentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex
AT toobyjohn thecontentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex
AT pietraszewskidavid contentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex
AT cosmidesleda contentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex
AT toobyjohn contentofourcooperationnotthecolorofourskinanalliancedetectionsystemregulatescategorizationbycoalitionandracebutnotsex