Cargando…

Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit

Pathological changes in pulp and periapical tissues are addressed by endodontic treatment. The material used in this treatment must be biocompatible. The aim of this study is to compare the skin reaction of Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) produced in Iran on rabbi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokravi, Marziyeh, Tabarsi, Bahareh, Moghaddamnia, Aliakbar, Sohanfaraji, Alieh, Pourghasem, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551764
_version_ 1782303180396167168
author Shokravi, Marziyeh
Tabarsi, Bahareh
Moghaddamnia, Aliakbar
Sohanfaraji, Alieh
Pourghasem, Mohsen
author_facet Shokravi, Marziyeh
Tabarsi, Bahareh
Moghaddamnia, Aliakbar
Sohanfaraji, Alieh
Pourghasem, Mohsen
author_sort Shokravi, Marziyeh
collection PubMed
description Pathological changes in pulp and periapical tissues are addressed by endodontic treatment. The material used in this treatment must be biocompatible. The aim of this study is to compare the skin reaction of Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) produced in Iran on rabbit. Sixteen male newzeland albino rabbits weighting 2 kg were used. The animals back hair was shaved, 24 hours before application of each material. The material was applied on two sites (2 × 2 cm) while the third site was used as control. All sites were covered by gauze and bandaged for 4 hours. Then the material's remnants were washed off the sites of application. Observations were performed in 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removing the materials. Erythematous surface areas were measured by the morphometric method. After sacrificing animals the skins were dissected and the specimens were prepared for histological evaluation. There were significant differences between CEM and MTA in erythematous surface areas at 1, 24 and 48 hours after removing the materials (p<0.05). However there was no significant difference at 72 hours after removing the materials. Data showed significant differences in counted cells between MTA and control sample (p=0.0001) and between MTA and CEM (p=0.035). There was no significant difference between control and CEM (p>0.05). The average erythematous surface areas were wider in MTA sites than CEM sites. As a conclusion it seems that biocompatibility of CEM could be more than MTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3920497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39204972014-02-18 Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit Shokravi, Marziyeh Tabarsi, Bahareh Moghaddamnia, Aliakbar Sohanfaraji, Alieh Pourghasem, Mohsen Int J Mol Cell Med Original Article Pathological changes in pulp and periapical tissues are addressed by endodontic treatment. The material used in this treatment must be biocompatible. The aim of this study is to compare the skin reaction of Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) produced in Iran on rabbit. Sixteen male newzeland albino rabbits weighting 2 kg were used. The animals back hair was shaved, 24 hours before application of each material. The material was applied on two sites (2 × 2 cm) while the third site was used as control. All sites were covered by gauze and bandaged for 4 hours. Then the material's remnants were washed off the sites of application. Observations were performed in 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removing the materials. Erythematous surface areas were measured by the morphometric method. After sacrificing animals the skins were dissected and the specimens were prepared for histological evaluation. There were significant differences between CEM and MTA in erythematous surface areas at 1, 24 and 48 hours after removing the materials (p<0.05). However there was no significant difference at 72 hours after removing the materials. Data showed significant differences in counted cells between MTA and control sample (p=0.0001) and between MTA and CEM (p=0.035). There was no significant difference between control and CEM (p>0.05). The average erythematous surface areas were wider in MTA sites than CEM sites. As a conclusion it seems that biocompatibility of CEM could be more than MTA. Babol University of Medical Sciences 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3920497/ /pubmed/24551764 Text en © 2012, International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shokravi, Marziyeh
Tabarsi, Bahareh
Moghaddamnia, Aliakbar
Sohanfaraji, Alieh
Pourghasem, Mohsen
Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title_full Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title_fullStr Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title_short Comparison of Skin Reaction between MTA (Produced in Iran) and CEM in Rabbit
title_sort comparison of skin reaction between mta (produced in iran) and cem in rabbit
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551764
work_keys_str_mv AT shokravimarziyeh comparisonofskinreactionbetweenmtaproducediniranandceminrabbit
AT tabarsibahareh comparisonofskinreactionbetweenmtaproducediniranandceminrabbit
AT moghaddamniaaliakbar comparisonofskinreactionbetweenmtaproducediniranandceminrabbit
AT sohanfarajialieh comparisonofskinreactionbetweenmtaproducediniranandceminrabbit
AT pourghasemmohsen comparisonofskinreactionbetweenmtaproducediniranandceminrabbit