Cargando…

A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)

Removing the bacteria, including Enterococcus faecalis, from the root canal is one of the important aims in endodontic treatment.We aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of Chlorhexidine with two natural drugs. The antibacterial activities of three different propolis extracts (alcohol concentr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehsani, Maryam, Amin Marashi, Mahmood, Zabihi, Ebrahim, Issazadeh, Maryam, Khafri, Soraya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551800
_version_ 1782303189460058112
author Ehsani, Maryam
Amin Marashi, Mahmood
Zabihi, Ebrahim
Issazadeh, Maryam
Khafri, Soraya
author_facet Ehsani, Maryam
Amin Marashi, Mahmood
Zabihi, Ebrahim
Issazadeh, Maryam
Khafri, Soraya
author_sort Ehsani, Maryam
collection PubMed
description Removing the bacteria, including Enterococcus faecalis, from the root canal is one of the important aims in endodontic treatment.We aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of Chlorhexidine with two natural drugs. The antibacterial activities of three different propolis extracts (alcohol concentrations: 0, 15, 40%) and Aloe vera gel on E. faecalis were compared using three methods: disk diffusion, microdilution and direct contact test. In addition to the above bacterium, the Aloe vera gel effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans was evaluated. Disk diffusion test revealed that propolis ethanolic extracts (the alcohol concentration of 15 and 40%) and Aloe vera gel have antibacterial activities but aqueous extract of propolis did not show any effect in this test. The MICs for propolis ethanolic extracts, Aloe vera gel and aqueous extract of propolis (0% alcohol) were 313 µg/ml, 750 µg/ml, 2250 µg/ml, and ≥ 500 µg/ml respectively, much higher than the Chlorhexidine one. In direct contact test, contrary to Aloe vera, all three propolis extracts showed antibacterial effects on E. faecalis. The Aloe vera gel also showed significant antibacterial effect on S.aureus and S.mutans. The hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis and Aloe vera gel had antibacterial effects on E. faecalis, however, propolis is more potent than Aloe vera. The antibacterial effect of Aloe vera on S. aureus and S. mutans is low (MIC ≥ 2250 µg/ml). Appropriate concentrations of alcoholic extracts of propolis and some fractions of Aloe vera gel might be good choices for disinfecting the root canal in endodontic treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3920536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39205362014-02-18 A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study) Ehsani, Maryam Amin Marashi, Mahmood Zabihi, Ebrahim Issazadeh, Maryam Khafri, Soraya Int J Mol Cell Med Original Article Removing the bacteria, including Enterococcus faecalis, from the root canal is one of the important aims in endodontic treatment.We aimed to compare the antibacterial activity of Chlorhexidine with two natural drugs. The antibacterial activities of three different propolis extracts (alcohol concentrations: 0, 15, 40%) and Aloe vera gel on E. faecalis were compared using three methods: disk diffusion, microdilution and direct contact test. In addition to the above bacterium, the Aloe vera gel effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans was evaluated. Disk diffusion test revealed that propolis ethanolic extracts (the alcohol concentration of 15 and 40%) and Aloe vera gel have antibacterial activities but aqueous extract of propolis did not show any effect in this test. The MICs for propolis ethanolic extracts, Aloe vera gel and aqueous extract of propolis (0% alcohol) were 313 µg/ml, 750 µg/ml, 2250 µg/ml, and ≥ 500 µg/ml respectively, much higher than the Chlorhexidine one. In direct contact test, contrary to Aloe vera, all three propolis extracts showed antibacterial effects on E. faecalis. The Aloe vera gel also showed significant antibacterial effect on S.aureus and S.mutans. The hydroalcoholic extracts of propolis and Aloe vera gel had antibacterial effects on E. faecalis, however, propolis is more potent than Aloe vera. The antibacterial effect of Aloe vera on S. aureus and S. mutans is low (MIC ≥ 2250 µg/ml). Appropriate concentrations of alcoholic extracts of propolis and some fractions of Aloe vera gel might be good choices for disinfecting the root canal in endodontic treatments. Babol University of Medical Sciences 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3920536/ /pubmed/24551800 Text en © 2013, International Journal of Molecular and Cellular Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ehsani, Maryam
Amin Marashi, Mahmood
Zabihi, Ebrahim
Issazadeh, Maryam
Khafri, Soraya
A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title_full A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title_fullStr A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title_short A Comparison between Antibacterial Activity of Propolis and Aloe vera on Enterococcus faecalis (an In Vitro Study)
title_sort comparison between antibacterial activity of propolis and aloe vera on enterococcus faecalis (an in vitro study)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551800
work_keys_str_mv AT ehsanimaryam acomparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT aminmarashimahmood acomparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT zabihiebrahim acomparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT issazadehmaryam acomparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT khafrisoraya acomparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT ehsanimaryam comparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT aminmarashimahmood comparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT zabihiebrahim comparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT issazadehmaryam comparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy
AT khafrisoraya comparisonbetweenantibacterialactivityofpropolisandaloeveraonenterococcusfaecalisaninvitrostudy